RE: Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IX FQ-340

RE: Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IX FQ-340

Thursday 20th October 2005

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IX FQ-340

Revised suspension and engine make Mitsu’s latest Evo the best yet, as Andrew Noakes discovers


Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IX FQ-340
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IX FQ-340

All sorts of things have inspired names for performance cars over the years, from animals and winds to exotic locations, mythical beasts and motor racing personalities. But if the Lancer Evo IX and its eight predecessors are anything to go by, whoever chooses the names at Mitsubishi is a fan of Limahl and Men Without Hats, and thus has a complete collection of Now That’s What I Call Music albums.

At first glance the latest Evo looks much the same as the Evo VIII. Externally there’s nothing to see except a new front grille/bumper moulding, 10-spoke Enkei wheels in place of the old six-spoke rims and an increment to the Roman numerals on the bootlid. But beneath the funky new colours are a series of improvements which together make the Evo IX a far more convincing car than its predecessor.

The IX inherits weight-saving features from the limited-edition Evo VIII MR, including an aluminium alloy roof (which saves 4kg) and side-impact bars (saving another 3.5kg). More importantly the alloy roof lowers the Evo’s centre of gravity, apparently having the same effect as lowering the roof height by 50mm. A tyre re-inflation kit replaces the spare wheel, and even the carbon-fibre rear wing, introduced on the Evo VIII, has been on a diet: it’s now hollow, saving another precious few ounces.

Underpinnings and motivation

none
none
none
none
345bhp 2-litre turbocharged
345bhp 2-litre turbocharged
none
none
none

Nordschleife-honed Bilstein suspension is a development of that first seen in the MR. There’s no change to the basic layout, with MacPherson struts up front and a multi-link rear end, but the rear springs are now shorter to improve stability and give the Super AYC yaw-control system, which transfers torque across the rear differential to kill any understeer, a chance to do its job. The Evo IX uses the MR’s four-wheel drive control strategy which continues to manage the centre differential and yaw control when the ABS system is in operation. That means a press-on driver can now use the brakes to alter the attitude of the car.

The engine is the 1997cc 4G63 in-line four which has been around since 1987, but now carrying MIVEC variable inlet valve timing which improves fuel economy and top-end power. It also cleans up the engine’s emissions, which means smaller cats are needed, and Mitsubishi claims that these help to improve low-rev throttle response.

The addition of intake temperature and pressure sensors allows the ECU to more precisely control fuelling and ignition timing, and further improvements are gained by lengthening the diffuser in the turbocharger’s compressor housing, which boosts low-end torque. As a result, the ‘basic’ FQ-300 generates up to 305bhp and 297lb ft, while the FQ-320 has 326bhp and 305lb ft thanks to freer-breathing induction and exhaust systems developed by Ralliart and HKS.

The top-spec FQ-340 we’ve just been tossed the keys to is basically the same, but with remapped fuelling and ignition which pushes maximum power up to 345bhp at 6800rpm and peak torque to 321lb ft at a high 4600rpm.

Behind the wheel

Settle behind the wheel and there’s little to tell you that this is an Evo IX rather than an Evo VIII. Purposeful controls like the mode selector for the centre differential, and the six-speed gearchange gate, are clues that this is more than just a roomy family saloon. There’s a chunky Momo wheel and shoulder-hugging Recaros with leather and Alcantara trim but, if cabin ambience is what you’re after, your £32,999 (the same price as the outgoing Evo VIII) is better spent elsewhere.

On the other hand, if performance is your priority, this is a pretty good place to spend it. From 3,000rpm, the turbo four pulls with real authority round to the red sector of the tacho beginning at 7,000rpm, and the narrower gaps between gears in the six-speed box make it easy to keep the turbo spinning.

All three Evo IXs will rocket to 60mph from rest in under five seconds, and Mitsubishi estimates the FQ-340’s time at 4.3sec. A good track surface and a cold day might see it get there even quicker, and it’s still impressive even when conditions aren’t perfect. Full-bore standing starts in the wet spin all four wheels if you try hard enough, but even then the Evo does not deviate from the chosen line.

Add bends to the equation and the Evo IX plays its trump card, the revised Bilstein suspension. Mitsubishi isn’t letting on, but I suspect the spring rates are softer and the damping stiffer than before. While the stiff-riding Evo VIII was unpredictable at best on a bumpy road, the Evo IX seems to take every sort of surface in its stride. Bumps do little to upset its composure in mid-corner, and neither does a prod of the right foot to deploy the mountain of mid-range torque. Driver confidence is further boosted by the talkative steering: the four-wheel drive chassis does its work and you can feel power feeding through to the front wheels, yet the helm never fights in your hands.

Not perfect

Like Now That’s What I Call Music the Evo IX has an impressive array of talents, but also some notable flaws. Drive-train shunt as you come off the throttle makes it impossible to drive smoothly in stop-start traffic. The throaty exhaust note is purposeful rather than inspiring and, though the noise level at full chat is fair enough, the Evo could profitably be quieter when ambling. And like many a big in-line four it suffers from an over-run boom, in this case at about 3,500rpm, which limits its ability to cruise in comfort. But it has to be said that few Evo owners are likely to care.

The latest Evo is the fastest, and the best, of a line which began back in 1992, and it won’t be the last. Already we’ve seen a concept version of the next-generation Evo X, which is expected some time in 2007 and is said to be ‘radically different’. At the last count NTWICM was up to edition 61, which gives Mitsubishi something to shoot for.

Who knows how many more Evos there might be?

Links

Author
Discussion

snorky

Original Poster:

2,322 posts

251 months

Thursday 20th October 2005
quotequote all
as much as I appreciate the technology of the thing that interior is just pants for the money.....

rsvmilly

11,288 posts

241 months

Thursday 20th October 2005
quotequote all
Gazboy said:
Dunno, would have to sit in one to give an opinion about the interior quality.
We'll have to swap keys one day.

MarkoTVR

1,139 posts

234 months

Thursday 20th October 2005
quotequote all
I've sat in one, and as has been said, you can probably get better interiors for the money......but the performance and handling aren't likely to come with it.

Perhaps not much of an excuse in this day and age, but despite the plasticky nature of it, the interior did seem to hang together very nicely.

The seats are something else though, they're fabulous.

rsvmilly

11,288 posts

241 months

Thursday 20th October 2005
quotequote all
MarkoTVR said:
I've sat in one, and as has been said, you can probably get better interiors for the money......but the performance and handling aren't likely to come with it.

Perhaps not much of an excuse in this day and age, but despite the plasticky nature of it, the interior did seem to hang together very nicely.

The seats are something else though, they're fabulous.
Dials are WAY too small. The speedo is a joke - 180degrees for 180mph. The needle is about 4mph thick.

The interior is uninspiring and did used to grate on me. Now I quite like it's simplicity.

Seats are brilliant, though. And the tiny Momo wheel is great to use - only 2.1 turns lock-to-lock.

don logan

3,520 posts

222 months

Thursday 20th October 2005
quotequote all
Having driven most variants of EVO I have to say that unless you drive them above 75% of their ability they seem a bit awkward and pointles BUT if you drive them above that 75% you really couldn`t care less about the interior!!!

_VTEC_

2,428 posts

245 months

Thursday 20th October 2005
quotequote all
Drove an EVO 8 once. A drive that will stay with me forever. Truly epic cars these.

smifffy

1,987 posts

266 months

Thursday 20th October 2005
quotequote all
don logan said:
Having driven most variants of EVO I have to say that unless you drive them above 75% of their ability they seem a bit awkward and pointles


This was exactly my impression when I test drove the Evo VI - Hence why I bought the P1. When your pants are on fire though the Evo is sublime.

don logan

3,520 posts

222 months

Thursday 20th October 2005
quotequote all
I`ve got an EVO6 RS2, the 8.5 and 9 have a much "calmer" ride thanks to the Bilsteins!

just because they look like saloons doesn`t mean they are comparable to something that BMW (a car with a nice interior)would make!

which is why you can only compare it with an imprezza
nothing else is even similar!

it`s a shame that soon we will only be able to buy UK cars, as mitsi have issued writs against certain "grey" importers!

This will stop us from having the choice to buy cars like forester STI`s and other interesting editions!

And if we were to import them privately, we would not be able to p/x them should we want to, because it would be illegal for traders to deal in cars not "officially" imported by the uk concession!!!!

rsvmilly

11,288 posts

241 months

Thursday 20th October 2005
quotequote all
I can't see them winning the case. And once the car is legally in this country and SVA'd how can Mitsi decide it is illegal?

The only complication might be servicing or PXing at official Mitsi dealers but there are loads of good independents around so that shouldn't be a problem.

don logan

3,520 posts

222 months

Thursday 20th October 2005
quotequote all
The issue is copywrite and permission
you cannot sell a non E.U brand without the manufacturers permission!
Only the Colt Car Company have this permission.
Mitsi are trying to extend this to used and nearly new models that have been imported by any business other than them!
If they are successful it will no doubt spread to the U.S car and truck market in the U.K and then on to stuff like electrical goods, motorbikes,etc etc

rsvmilly

11,288 posts

241 months

Thursday 20th October 2005
quotequote all
don logan said:
The issue is copywrite and permission
you cannot sell a non E.U brand without the manufacturers permission!
Copyright? Nobody is trying to copy them.
Permission (licence) more like, but if I have an imported Evo and my neighbour wants to buy it off me, how can the manufacturer make that sale illegal?

don logan

3,520 posts

222 months

Thursday 20th October 2005
quotequote all
sorry copyright not write, however I have it on good authority that is a copyright issue, the same issue that Tesco had with Levi jeans when trying to sell them at discounted prices!
there will be no problem selling a "grey" privately
BUT business` will not be able to trade in them or import them!
If this were not fact I would be buying an EVO 1X wagon from Xtreme UK in Dudley.
unfortunately it is and i`m not!!!!

Craig Armstrong

247 posts

229 months

Friday 21st October 2005
quotequote all
don logan said:
sorry copyright not write, however I have it on good authority that is a copyright issue, the same issue that Tesco had with Levi jeans when trying to sell them at discounted prices!


Its actually a trade mark issue (as was Tesco case) - known as parallel importing. EU competition law permits free trade of products within the EU but imports from outside the EU is another matter. Basically the manufacturer uses trade mark laws to partition the global market. However, an Evo is just an Evo, so we'll see what happens with this case!

rsvmilly

11,288 posts

241 months

Friday 21st October 2005
quotequote all
Just as jeans are jeans but didn't Levis get their own way to some extent? You can still buy them a fair bit cheaper now, though.

It didn't work with the Japanese bike manufaturers. In the early nineties a Fireblade was near on 10K but parallel importers did them for nearer 7-8K. Nowadays, bike prices are a good 20% cheaper than they were ten or so years ago (more when taking account of inflation).

Mr E

21,616 posts

259 months

Friday 21st October 2005
quotequote all
Gazboy said:

Ok! But my God are you getting the shitty end of the deal!


Indeed Getz for an Evo is a swap I'd be partial too if I owned the Getz.....

Batty FTO

12,268 posts

250 months

Friday 21st October 2005
quotequote all
mmmmmmmm.....
Mivec

granville

18,764 posts

261 months

Friday 21st October 2005
quotequote all
snorky said:
as much as I appreciate the technology of the thing that interior is just pants for the money.....


Absolutely disagree: that interior is a perfect blend of tactility and operational perfection.

A 'VI' did indeed have an el cheapo feel, granted but this is completely different - visually it's less bland to me than a contemporary 5 series, say.

Do you think the same thing about an F40 which is easily out interiored by a 1983 Lada Riva Concours d'Elegance?

F@cking wonderful.

don logan

3,520 posts

222 months

Friday 21st October 2005
quotequote all
rsvmilly said:
Just as jeans are jeans but didn't Levis get their own way to some extent? You can still buy them a fair bit cheaper now, though.

It didn't work with the Japanese bike manufaturers. In the early nineties a Fireblade was near on 10K but parallel importers did them for nearer 7-8K. Nowadays, bike prices are a good 20% cheaper than they were ten or so years ago (more when taking account of inflation).


It`s not just about driving prices down i`ts about having the choice to buy more specialist models that are NOT available as UK cars, such as Forester STI`s, EVO9 GT`s, EVO9 wagons, where would you have bought an EVO5 back in 1998?????

rsvmilly

11,288 posts

241 months

Friday 21st October 2005
quotequote all
don logan said:

rsvmilly said:
Just as jeans are jeans but didn't Levis get their own way to some extent? You can still buy them a fair bit cheaper now, though.

It didn't work with the Japanese bike manufaturers. In the early nineties a Fireblade was near on 10K but parallel importers did them for nearer 7-8K. Nowadays, bike prices are a good 20% cheaper than they were ten or so years ago (more when taking account of inflation).



It`s not just about driving prices down i`ts about having the choice to buy more specialist models that are NOT available as UK cars, such as Forester STI`s, EVO9 GT`s, EVO9 wagons, where would you have bought an EVO5 back in 1998?????
It's a combination of driving prices down to more worldwide averages through competition and the ability to drive more unusual models. After all, if it wasn't for the importers, there would be no Evos at all in the UK.

Apparently, Mitsubishi started the action because importers were bringing in lower spec L100s from Thailand. For further reading;

http://lancerregister.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=82478

rsvmilly

11,288 posts

241 months

Friday 21st October 2005
quotequote all
derestrictor said:

snorky said:
as much as I appreciate the technology of the thing that interior is just pants for the money.....



Absolutely disagree: that interior is a perfect blend of tactility and operational perfection.

A 'VI' did indeed have an el cheapo feel, granted but this is completely different - visually it's less bland to me than a contemporary 5 series, say.

Do you think the same thing about an F40 which is easily out interiored by a 1983 Lada Riva Concours d'Elegance?

F@cking wonderful.
Indeed. It does what it needs to.