RE: BMW M5

Tuesday 5th July 2005

BMW M5

Nick Hall plumbs the hidden depths of BMW's four-seat GT


BMW M5
BMW M5

With a day on a race circuit followed by a jaunt along the south coast of France to the Monaco Grand Prix and a 12-hour drive home to England, I never thought the satnav would prove the major factor in my long-distance test of BMW’s M5.

But as we left Nice expecting the fastest route, the system had other ideas. It wasn’t until we crossed the Italian border, into a tunnel that marked the first of 1000 more mountains, that we realised how wrong we’d gone.

none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none

Not one person agrees with that computer, which may not have factored in the human need for self preservation on fearsome mountain passes, but this major detour turned out to be a serious blessing. It gave me a chance to re-evaluate this elegant giant, the opportunity to fall for its charms.

Alpine charm

The 200km drive through the Alps, first to the North to Turin and then to the West across the mountain range to Grenoble, is the stuff of dreams. Even at 11pm, in pitch darkness, with a light drizzle forming and homicidal locals in high-powered Mercedes, 360s and knackered hatchbacks all taking the racing line.

There was a simple choice: drive slow and safe and emerge from the Alps at dawn or join the impromptu Deathrace 2000 along the road that looked like it was thrown at the side of the mountain. Not much of a choice at all then…

Roads like this tell you everything about a car’s handling as theoretical performance pales into insignificance next to the feel offered through the wheel. Forget 205mph top speeds, ours was limited to just over 160mph. In any case, it’s these places that lay a car’s soul bare and, jacked down to its hardest settings, it was here that the M5 finally proved it had the heart to back up its technical excellence.

The only thing that limited the speed was my valour with the right foot. Even at 130mph on a narrow mountain road, this £61,760 supercar in sheep’s clothing had plenty left for those blind bends and when I thought I’d badly overcooked it I only found more grip.

The gearbox suddenly made sense, the heads-up display became an invaluable part of the driving process and the true qualities of the car came to the fore. It’s not a super saloon in the traditional sense, it’s a grand touring supercar with a BMW badge.

It can hang with the Aston Martin DB9 and Ferrari 612 Scaglietti and taken on purely on merit is better than either at a fraction of the price. Forget the ‘rivals’ from AMG and Jaguar, they’d be lucky to stay in the same time zone on these roads.

A work of genius

BMWs are much more of a ground-up rework than the AMG Mercs. They tend to beef up what’s already there, while this car is built around that award-winning transmission. The suspension is 5 Series based, but you wouldn’t know it when hustling down a dangerous road with every block of rubber sending bulletins by e-mail every fraction of a second back to the wheel.

Considering its looks, weight and versatility, that makes it a phenomenal car, one of the very best in the world. It’s genius.

And this was a dramatic turnaround, as I’d left the circuit part of our test non-plussed. Yes it was quick and sounded good but the track served only to highlight that this was a heavy road car doing an exceptional job of hiding its 1,755kg. It kept coming back to the same thing: massively competent, amazing engineering, but lacking true inspiration.

To be fair, it just wasn’t the right environment to judge a four-seater car that rides so well round town. I also had other things to worry about, too. Sitting next to Mark Hales, sometime Pistonheads contributor, international racer extraordinaire and former colleague in my former days on CCC magazine, I suddenly felt like a learner out on my first lesson and fell apart in quite spectacular style. I put that car through everything, taking a whole chicane on the brakes and dropping a wheel on the grass at more than 100mph while attempting to use that last inch of track.

To their infinite credit, neither car nor Mark flinched once. However, the track work served only to prove that there is an awful lot of technology calling the shots and keeping this car on the straight and narrow. But as this car is aimed at the executive who simply wants a little more pleasure than the big Mercs and Jags can provide, that’s got to go down in the plus points column.

I loved the seats, too, with bolsters that fire up according to the corner to hold the driver like a full-bore bucket job, but couldn’t find the button to make the work under my own steam for the remainder of the trip. On occasion the M5 made me feel like my granddad trying to programme the video.

Too much technology?

Some gadgets left me cold. At 28, I’m too young to be a dinosaur and, even though that gearbox that is undoubtedly a technical marvel, I can’t fully embrace paddle-shifters and I am still gagging to get hold of the six-speed manual M5 and M6 currently under consideration.

And while the manual mode of the SMG proved spectacular on the open road, giving that racing feel with a dirty V10 wailing soundtrack, including that cool throttle blip, on the circuit it refused a few of the most aggressive change downs when the computer said the revs were too high.

Setting the car up via the iDrive, from 11 gearchange possibilities through the adjustable levels of traction control, might be an engineer’s wet dream, too. But a great car is one that you can step into and feel at one with, and the M5’s very depth prevents that happening. BMW may have got carried away with what was possible, rather than producing a simple system to suit most styles.

As it stands, getting the most from your M5 might require a night class. Lean on the gadgets and they’ll have your back, but this is technical tour de force rather than a car hewn from raw emotion.

Thankfully the driver’s favourite settings, in our case fast, hard and frantic, can be accessed with a touch of the wheel-mounted M button. Nudge the button and the car tangibly perks up like a startled dog, the response is fast enough to make this a near Nuclear Overtake button. Push it, and nothing will resist the move.

You won’t drive this car in 500bhp+ super crazy mode the whole time: it’s just unnecessary. It’s nice to know it’s there, though, and at the touch of a button at that. The launch control system feels like a violent assault, too, but perfect racing start takes about six steps to engage to prevent litigious Americans maiming themselves just enough to sue big-time.

There were other downsides: fuel stops every 200 miles when pressing on, a footprint so wide it barely made it onto the runners of the Channel Tunnel train, and the fact that it doesn’t look all that different to the standard 5. On the autoroute it all felt downright boring at sane speeds, too -- this vehicle's natural gait is about 130mph and that can get you in trouble more or less everywhere.

Verdict

The result is a subtle car that can match the very best Grand Tourers of today, costs about 70 per cent less, doesn’t have an obnoxious badge on the front and can live its life as a fruity sounding 5 Series at the push of a detune button. The fact that the M6 should be even better and have that sporting killer instinct and feel that the M5 lacked suggests the ultimate performance car tags might well be warranted.

This verdict could so easily have gone the other way, had the satnav not had the forethought to send us via the most challenging route it could find. Maybe it knew what we were thinking, it is that clever after all.

On that road, I could bang up the box and back down again as required with just a few finger clicks – Playstation-style – when a manual box and heavy clutch would have killed me. On that road, I could power out of bends with all the confidence in the world knowing I had more electronic back-up than Microsoft. On that road, this M5 would have slaughtered the car I wished I’d been driving.

On that road, this car was inspired.

Author
Discussion

r988

Original Poster:

7,495 posts

230 months

Tuesday 5th July 2005
quotequote all
great photos they really show the new M5 at its best angles :thumbup:

huge

1,138 posts

285 months

Tuesday 5th July 2005
quotequote all
So.....just for arguments sake....is the question now whether a 997 can stay with an M5 on a "sporting " road,rather than the other way round ?

paddy27

1,742 posts

235 months

Tuesday 5th July 2005
quotequote all
I still want one!

chippy17

3,740 posts

244 months

Tuesday 5th July 2005
quotequote all
paddy27 said:
I still want one!



me too lovely, although the Alpina might have something to say...

>> Edited by chippy17 on Tuesday 5th July 13:28

WillieBoffin

1 posts

226 months

Tuesday 5th July 2005
quotequote all
If you love the M5 like I do you'll like the video clip of the new M5 really is a cool. www.roadmonster.co.uk

Wicked pictures by the way you can almost smell the interior.

kawasicki

13,096 posts

236 months

Tuesday 5th July 2005
quotequote all
Not directly aimed at this article, but this talk of huge amounts of grip always confuses me. On a smooth road on road legal tyres you would be lucky to get 1.1G lateral in any car and then only momentarily. On a typical corner on a normal road you might be looking at 0.9G max. So where is this huge grip coming from? If you expect more you are in the hedge, does anyone agree? ESP will only do so much!

vpinto

51 posts

285 months

Tuesday 5th July 2005
quotequote all
Yes, I guess that you are right...

But I also guess that it's all about suspension settings and chassis behaviour. And that should make a huge diference. Otherwise, two cars of the same weight and the same tires would go around corners exactly the same way.

Just my two cents.

Cheers,
VP

hatchback

21 posts

241 months

Tuesday 5th July 2005
quotequote all
Nick,

Thanks for the great review. Just curious, what is "the car you wished you'd been driving"?

lap_time

339 posts

228 months

Wednesday 6th July 2005
quotequote all
chippy17 said:

paddy27 said:
I still want one!




me too lovely, although the Alpina might have something to say...

>> Edited by chippy17 on Tuesday 5th July 13:28


Saw a 545i the other day. SOOO much better looking in the flesh. I'm just wondering whether anyone's actually going to be able to figure out HOW to tune this thing...

r988

Original Poster:

7,495 posts

230 months

Wednesday 6th July 2005
quotequote all
yeah the M5 wheels dont suit the car, the 5 spokes on some 545i's though do wonders for improving its look.

604

489 posts

233 months

Wednesday 6th July 2005
quotequote all
huge said:
So.....just for arguments sake....is the question now whether a 997 can stay with an M5 on a "sporting " road,rather than the other way round ?


In last months Top Gear it said the M6 (which should be on parr if not better than the M5 performance wise) would "be creamed by a 997 if (the 997) was in the right hannds"

lap_time

339 posts

228 months

Thursday 7th July 2005
quotequote all
604 said:

huge said:
So.....just for arguments sake....is the question now whether a 997 can stay with an M5 on a "sporting " road,rather than the other way round ?



In last months Top Gear it said the M6 (which should be on parr if not better than the M5 performance wise) would "be creamed by a 997 if (the 997) was in the right hannds"


Somehow I think I'd go with Top Gear. M6 has the grunt (all 500 horses of it) but is a comparative lardbucket. Around a track i think I'd see the Porka driver streak away while the Beemer pilot (note 'pilot') curses amd swears at the computer for not letting him/her do what they want to.
Give me a QP any day...

burwoodman

18,709 posts

247 months

Thursday 7th July 2005
quotequote all
Re the M6, with a 0 to 100 time of 9 secs flat it would eat a 997 for breakfast- who cares about a track. 99.9% of driving is in the real world-on roads.

huge

1,138 posts

285 months

Thursday 7th July 2005
quotequote all
Have to agree,thats why I stipulated "sporting " road ,not track....if you want to get into track arguments,an Atom would demolish a 997,but it hardly makes it a better car !!

burwoodman

18,709 posts

247 months

Thursday 7th July 2005
quotequote all
From what ive read the BMW is just about the finest sports car money can buy, let alone the 80k price tag bargain.

997s are simply not in the same league in my opinion. My M3 would keep pace with a 997

Zod

35,295 posts

259 months

Thursday 7th July 2005
quotequote all
My CSL would beat the M6 around a track, particularly the Ring, but if I came up against an M6 on the road, it would leave me for dead. It's 1.5 seconds quicker to 100 and that's a lot.

604

489 posts

233 months

Thursday 7th July 2005
quotequote all
yes the M5 and M6 are both quite a bit faster in a straight line but the cars in Top Gear were tested in the real world on roads somewhere in Spain (I think)...

And theres plenty of twisties in the real world that would simulate a track ...theres a very memorable drive very close to my house, in fact

Spie

122 posts

254 months

Thursday 7th July 2005
quotequote all
Nice article. Mine arrives in 10 days

4WD

2,289 posts

232 months

Thursday 7th July 2005
quotequote all
I adore the RS6, new M3 and previous M5, so I was expecting to love this new M5. Unfortunately it's as ugly as sin in the metal. Such a let down. One of those cars that's better to drive than have to look at.

biker.ie

170 posts

241 months

Friday 8th July 2005
quotequote all
I just wonder about the long-term reliability of such a high-revving highly stressed engine, and whether or not it will have that M3 type oil-pump/crankshaft/exploding engine syndrome once the miles pile on. Otherwise it'd make a great secondhand buy one 50% depreciation hits in