RE: BMW M3 CS

RE: BMW M3 CS

Wednesday 8th February 2006

BMW M3 CS

Nick Hall takes one of Bavaria's finest exports and finds there's little it lacks


BMW M3 CS
BMW M3 CS

Niche cars are out of control in the modern world and if you want a two-seater Sports Utility MPV Hatchback Turbo, you’ll find it somewhere. Some are utterly pointless -- think Golf Plus. Some, like the BMW M3 CS, however, are carefully polished diamonds.

none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none

This is a halfway house between BMW’s outgoing BMW M3, soon to be replaced by the new shape 400bhp fire-breathing 3 Series, and the formidable M3 CSL. The strictly limited CSL was launched in 2003 and instantly became a legend, taking the fight to Porsche’s 911 and Ferrari’s 360 but, at almost £60,000, it was an awful lot of money for a 3 Series BMW. It also came with just one transmission choice: the SMG semi-automatic.

Undoubtedly it was the fastest way to change gear at the time and BMW is at the vanguard of movement. But while perfect, clutchless gearchanges are available at the blink of an eye, speed through technology isn’t for everyone.

Taking the clutch and manual box away sterilises the experience and robs the driver of the satisfaction achieved from a perfect downchange on the way into a corner, with the merest hint of opposite lock to catch the slide.

Cars like the M3 are all about those times when the family is at home, a familiar road opens out in front of you and invites you to attack. It’s an aggressive machine and the SMG appeared totally at odds with the ethos of the lightweight, full-blooded CSL.

It makes sense

So this, the last model that will come from the E46 line-up makes an awful lot of sense. At £43,555 it’s expensive, but still in touch with the real world, and it’s different enough from the standard M3 to be well worth the investment – sharing many of its more exclusive predecessor’s features without impinging on its exclusivity.

The CS is something of a CSL-lite, not quite as hair-raising, not quite as loud. Crucially, though, it has a proper gearbox and that makes for a more basic kind of fun.

The £2,400 option package over the price of a standard M3 buys CSL-look 19-inch wheels, bigger front brakes, a faster steering rack and a more advanced traction control system. As the standard M3 is often lauded as the best coupe on the planet, BMW risked gilding the lily with such minor changes, but it has pulled it off.

The extra cost is a mere triviality, but order the Interlagos Blue, red, anything but black. As the CS has no distinguishing badge, a black CS would look like a bad, home-brewed CSL copy and that’s just not the thing to do to an M3.

Inside there’s an Alcantara-clad steering wheel, which adds to the sporting vibe, but isn’t the most forgiving thing on a long trek and could in fact spawn a new generation clad in stringback driving gloves . Still, the seats are far more comfortable than the CSL’s borderline racing buckets and the M3’s overall ride defies belief for a car with such sporting purpose.

The best compromise?

The M3 is the best compromise between performance and practicality outside of the more expensive Porsche 911 range. It’s still firm and the wheel needs a strong hand to keep the car online at cruising speeds, but 300 mile-stints in this car will melt away when you consider the speeds you’ll be doing.

And when this car hits one of those back roads, without a Gatso in sight and tightening off-camber bends, you won’t mind the extra effort in the car park, as the M3 CS truly comes alive.

The quicker and more sensitive steering rack makes has a major plus side, though: racecar-sharp turn-in. It’s as if the front wheels are connected to human hands by nerves, rather than a medley of components.

Bodyroll is negligible and BMW’s famous 50/50 front/rear weight balance means that the 1,570Kg M3 CS will flick through bends with perfect sports car poise. With the electronics off it will slide, but it’s never threatening and you’d have to really provoke it to throw this car into a hedge.

The M3 and the 911 are two of the only cars you can jump into and feel at one with, a car with a crystal clear limit and infinite feedback through the wheel. There’s a reason why the M3 legend is revered throughout the automotive world and it’s a driving experience everyone should try at least once.

Heavy hips

It’s not the lightest machine in the world, thanks to being loaded up with creature comforts and none of the weight-saving measures of the CSL, but a well balanced car can handle a few extra kilos on its hips without sacrificing that all important poise.

The 3.2-litre six cylinder that powers the M3 CS has won the engine Oscars for five consecutive years, which isn’t surprising when you feel how the 343bhp and 269lb ft of torque are delivered.

It accelerates to 60mph in 5.2s and will hit the electronically limited 155mph top speed without trauma. Mid-range acceleration is ballistic and four a car with four seats, it’s hard to believe the response from the inline Six pumping menacingly under the bonnet.

Pushed hard it also produces a metallic scream that will stay with you right till the 8000rpm redline, and potentially forever. Outside of the exotic supercar class, and the V10 M cars, this is one of the finest sounding engines in the world.

Finest driver's car

The new M3, when it arrives in 2007, will boast a 400bhp V8 engine and far more tricks than this machine. Until then and perhaps even after, this will remain the finest driver’s car in the BMW range. In keeping things simple, the Roundel might just have found a niche we can all appreciate.

Author
Discussion

DoctorD

Original Poster:

1,542 posts

256 months

Wednesday 8th February 2006
quotequote all
But will it be remembered as a classic? I suspect with hindsight BMW should have made the M3 like the M3 CS all along. That would still have allowed room for an M3 CSL. It's amusing to see reviews of the M3 CS being all positive and glowing, when many reviewers were far more critical of the CSL. Perhaps it's taken them so long to understand it's virtues or recognise some of the limitations with the standard E46 M3. Price obviously has a bearing and whilst £40-50k seems straightforward for most to accept, I suspect £60k wasn't.

In some respects the biggest problem the M3 CS has is the M3 CSL which is available on the second-hand market for much less money and is a much more impressive car to drive, if you can do without some creature comforts.

slippydiff

14,830 posts

223 months

Wednesday 8th February 2006
quotequote all
Come over here for a bit of peace and quiet DoctorD ? me too (A bit too much testosterone on the "other" thread now !!
I think, as you rightly point out, that the CS should have been available a lot earlier in the E46's life.
But I also feel there would have been enough room for all three models in the range from day one.
BMW's Mpower marketing men missing a trick............that's a first.

DoctorD

Original Poster:

1,542 posts

256 months

Wednesday 8th February 2006
quotequote all
slippydiff said:
BMW's Mpower marketing men missing a trick............that's a first.


Yeah, where's the diesel M?


Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!

slippydiff

14,830 posts

223 months

Wednesday 8th February 2006
quotequote all
Seconds out round two ?

dinod

1,953 posts

221 months

Wednesday 8th February 2006
quotequote all
DoctorD said:
slippydiff said:
BMW's Mpower marketing men missing a trick............that's a first.


Yeah, where's the diesel M?


Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!


Please lets not have another diesel vs petrol thing over here!!! It's amazing how a discussion over fuel can be so ahem explosive !!

Back to the M3. I think BMW are just trying to segment the sales of the M3 into 3 parts and catch more sales:
Standard M3 for most drivers and posers
M3CS for more committed drivers and badge snobby posers
M3 CSL for even more committed drivers and even more badge snobby posers!!

>> Edited by dinod on Wednesday 8th February 19:25

DoctorD

Original Poster:

1,542 posts

256 months

Wednesday 8th February 2006
quotequote all
It's a shame they left it so late to launch the M3 CS, a lot of them lie unsold at dealerships. Fashion is a large part of the buying decision and most people will be waiting for the E92 M3.

Zod

35,295 posts

258 months

Wednesday 8th February 2006
quotequote all
dinod said:
DoctorD said:
slippydiff said:
BMW's Mpower marketing men missing a trick............that's a first.


Yeah, where's the diesel M?


Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!


Please lets not have another diesel vs petrol thing over here!!! It's amazing how a discussion over fuel can be so ahem explosive !!

Back to the M3. I think BMW are just trying to segment the sales of the M3 into 3 parts and catch more sales:
Standard M3 for most drivers and posers
M3CS for more committed drivers and badge snobby posers
M3 CSL for even more committed drivers and even more badge snobby posers!!

>> Edited by dinod on Wednesday 8th February 19:25
Hardly anyone can tell the difference between the M3 and CSL, let alone the CS and CSL. If you buy a CSL for the pose value, you will hate it. Enthusiasts will spot it, but no-one else will and meanwhile you will be putting up with the ride without understanding why it has to be that way.

_VTEC_

2,428 posts

245 months

Wednesday 8th February 2006
quotequote all
The one thing I disliked about the CSL was the mandatory SMG. Now the only things the CS lacks are the sportier seats and the Carbon intake. Both of which you can buy similar of at the aftermarket.

I'd definately have one.

scoobz

6,578 posts

248 months

Wednesday 8th February 2006
quotequote all
[quote=dinodBack to the M3. I think BMW are just trying to segment the sales of the M3 into 3 parts and catch more sales:
Standard M3 for most drivers and posers
M3CS for more committed drivers and badge snobby posers
M3 CSL for even more committed drivers and even more badge snobby posers!!
[/quote]

Yep thats exactly how BMW think...

R988

7,495 posts

229 months

Wednesday 8th February 2006
quotequote all
_VTEC_ said:
The one thing I disliked about the CSL was the mandatory SMG. Now the only things the CS lacks are the sportier seats and the Carbon intake. Both of which you can buy similar of at the aftermarket.

I'd definately have one.


doesn't the CSL have a carbon roof as well?

I'm fairly sure the CS has been available in the US for quite a while now as well.

m12_nathan

5,138 posts

259 months

Wednesday 8th February 2006
quotequote all
_VTEC_ said:
The one thing I disliked about the CSL was the mandatory SMG. Now the only things the CS lacks are the sportier seats and the Carbon intake. Both of which you can buy similar of at the aftermarket.

I'd definately have one.


The CSL has a much bigger list of changes than that.

Alpha N mapping, different ecu (twice the memory), different cams, air box with no MAF (uses alpha N instead), wider track on front, 200cell cats instead of 400cell, thinner exhaust, anti roll bars, dampers, springs and most importantly 10cm lower centre of gravity (10cm lower in body so without the lower suspension taken into account) and a substantial weight loss (180kg's IIRC) from things like bumpers (carbon), roof (carbon), boot lid (plastic). Zod owns a CSL and was using the CS on the bmw driver training and said there was a big difference in driving them.

m12_nathan

5,138 posts

259 months

Wednesday 8th February 2006
quotequote all
R988 said:
_VTEC_ said:
The one thing I disliked about the CSL was the mandatory SMG. Now the only things the CS lacks are the sportier seats and the Carbon intake. Both of which you can buy similar of at the aftermarket.

I'd definately have one.


doesn't the CSL have a carbon roof as well?

I'm fairly sure the CS has been available in the US for quite a while now as well.


Yep, it is called the competition pack or similar and has been around for ages.

derin100

5,214 posts

243 months

Wednesday 8th February 2006
quotequote all
Firstly, I wouldn't laugh too hard or disparagingly at this time about the notion of a possible future 'M-Diesel'! Given that the company with 4-Rings on the nose has won Le Mans five times out of the last six but now intends to do it with a diesel! Consider also BMW's interest in the 120d racing version? Whether we like it or not that's what may be on offer in the future!

Secondly, I must admit this is the first I'd heard of the E46 M3 'CS'! I genuinely hope that its 'late' appearance plus lack of full-on 'kudos' compared with the CSL will work to my advantage! I've more or less decided a 'straight-standard' E46 M3 is not worth having for my purposes (ie. essentially to go into a collection)...by virtue of their own success they are just too common for me to be really interested in now. I'm too crap a driver to be able to justify a hard-line track car like the CSL...which until now had been my front runner if I were to buy an E46 M3. I have had to face the reality that whilst I have owned an E30 M3 for 5 years now...I've never had it beyond the spectator car park of a track day!

This 'CS' may has renewed my interest! It will have a difference that sets it apart from the 'everyday M3', seems like it will not appeal to either the hardened track-day enthusiast nor the well-heeled who will immediately be buy the new M3 in 2007? Maybe I'll find one languishing, unloved, unwanted, derided, gathering dust and unsold in a dealership in two years time!

There seems hope for a 'softy' like me yet!?...Pity it's not available with SMG...I did quite fancy that as a change (not that I really understood it when I drove one!) but I guess one can't have everything!



>> Edited by derin100 on Wednesday 8th February 21:04

>> Edited by derin100 on Wednesday 8th February 21:06

scoobz

6,578 posts

248 months

Wednesday 8th February 2006
quotequote all
m12_nathan said:
R988 said:
_VTEC_ said:
The one thing I disliked about the CSL was the mandatory SMG. Now the only things the CS lacks are the sportier seats and the Carbon intake. Both of which you can buy similar of at the aftermarket.

I'd definately have one.


doesn't the CSL have a carbon roof as well?

I'm fairly sure the CS has been available in the US for quite a while now as well.


Yep, it is called the competition pack or similar and has been around for ages.


certainly has.

sounds bugger all like the csl, costs an extra $4000 and adds zero value. You get the cup wheels. Which is nice.

m12_nathan

5,138 posts

259 months

Wednesday 8th February 2006
quotequote all
derin100 said:

There seems hope for a 'softy' like me yet!?...Pity it's not available with SMG...I did quite fancy that as a change (not that I really understood it when I drove one!) but I guess one can't have everything!


You can have SMG2 as an option, same as the normal M3, software is different to the CSL though.

derin100

5,214 posts

243 months

Wednesday 8th February 2006
quotequote all
Thank you Nathan...you make my smile even broader!

m12_nathan

5,138 posts

259 months

Wednesday 8th February 2006
quotequote all
PS. try a CSL, doesn't matter how good a driver you are, the noise is worth it on it's own.

scoobz

6,578 posts

248 months

Wednesday 8th February 2006
quotequote all
m12_nathan said:
PS. try a CSL, doesn't matter how good a driver you are, the noise is worth it on it's own.


Yes yes and thrice yes.

derin100

5,214 posts

243 months

Wednesday 8th February 2006
quotequote all
Hang on! I shouldn't be saying this!!!

What I meant to say was:

"Yeah! It's a pile of crap! What kind of t*sser/crap driver would want one of these half-baked cars anyway?! I wouldn't touch one of these with a barge pole!"

baz1985

3,598 posts

245 months

Wednesday 8th February 2006
quotequote all
I was determined to buy a E46 M3 (standard). But values are in free-fall: ps you can easily get £4-5k off a new one (CS included) (was offered this a few weeks back), frankly I can't afford it or insure it. Anyway now that they've screwed the warranty, I'll be on the lookout for a Cayman in 18 months or so