Baron Von Grumble
Discussion
oj113 said:
I don't know BVG but to be honest who he does squelchy things with and what they believe is his/their business surely.
'He's not been around much and he's got a new squeeze' is as relevant as it gets to the topic.
Well maybe, were she not a deliberately public figure also. But if you put yourself in the public eye via social media, then hook up with someone else who has deliberately cultivated a public persona, you have invited discussion on both of you as individuals and as a couple. You can't say "Here is my life! Love me!" but disagree with the people who don't love you or become curious beyond what you present to the public. 'He's not been around much and he's got a new squeeze' is as relevant as it gets to the topic.
Let's be clear, they are not well known for some kind of sporting achievement or for heroically tackling a gunman on a plane or giving to charity and can therefore rightfully try to stay out of the limelight or avoid speculation on their private life. They are well known because they woke up one day and made a conscious decision to try and be well known. Where do they expect to draw the line?
Reardy Mister said:
Well maybe, were she not a deliberately public figure also. But if you put yourself in the public eye via social media, then hook up with someone else who has deliberately cultivated a public persona, you have invited discussion on both of you as individuals and as a couple. You can't say "Here is my life! Love me!" but disagree with the people who don't love you or become curious beyond what you present to the public.
Let's be clear, they are not well known for some kind of sporting achievement or for heroically tackling a gunman on a plane or giving to charity and can therefore rightfully try to stay out of the limelight or avoid speculation on their private life. They are well known because they woke up one day and made a conscious decision to try and be well known. Where do they expect to draw the line?
I'm still not clear. Would you or wouldn't you?Let's be clear, they are not well known for some kind of sporting achievement or for heroically tackling a gunman on a plane or giving to charity and can therefore rightfully try to stay out of the limelight or avoid speculation on their private life. They are well known because they woke up one day and made a conscious decision to try and be well known. Where do they expect to draw the line?
3DP said:
Reardy Mister said:
Well maybe, were she not a deliberately public figure also. But if you put yourself in the public eye via social media, then hook up with someone else who has deliberately cultivated a public persona, you have invited discussion on both of you as individuals and as a couple. You can't say "Here is my life! Love me!" but disagree with the people who don't love you or become curious beyond what you present to the public.
Let's be clear, they are not well known for some kind of sporting achievement or for heroically tackling a gunman on a plane or giving to charity and can therefore rightfully try to stay out of the limelight or avoid speculation on their private life. They are well known because they woke up one day and made a conscious decision to try and be well known. Where do they expect to draw the line?
I'm still not clear. Would you or wouldn't you?Let's be clear, they are not well known for some kind of sporting achievement or for heroically tackling a gunman on a plane or giving to charity and can therefore rightfully try to stay out of the limelight or avoid speculation on their private life. They are well known because they woke up one day and made a conscious decision to try and be well known. Where do they expect to draw the line?
theshrew said:
3DP said:
Reardy Mister said:
Well maybe, were she not a deliberately public figure also. But if you put yourself in the public eye via social media, then hook up with someone else who has deliberately cultivated a public persona, you have invited discussion on both of you as individuals and as a couple. You can't say "Here is my life! Love me!" but disagree with the people who don't love you or become curious beyond what you present to the public.
Let's be clear, they are not well known for some kind of sporting achievement or for heroically tackling a gunman on a plane or giving to charity and can therefore rightfully try to stay out of the limelight or avoid speculation on their private life. They are well known because they woke up one day and made a conscious decision to try and be well known. Where do they expect to draw the line?
I'm still not clear. Would you or wouldn't you?Let's be clear, they are not well known for some kind of sporting achievement or for heroically tackling a gunman on a plane or giving to charity and can therefore rightfully try to stay out of the limelight or avoid speculation on their private life. They are well known because they woke up one day and made a conscious decision to try and be well known. Where do they expect to draw the line?
graeme4130 said:
theshrew said:
3DP said:
Reardy Mister said:
Well maybe, were she not a deliberately public figure also. But if you put yourself in the public eye via social media, then hook up with someone else who has deliberately cultivated a public persona, you have invited discussion on both of you as individuals and as a couple. You can't say "Here is my life! Love me!" but disagree with the people who don't love you or become curious beyond what you present to the public.
Let's be clear, they are not well known for some kind of sporting achievement or for heroically tackling a gunman on a plane or giving to charity and can therefore rightfully try to stay out of the limelight or avoid speculation on their private life. They are well known because they woke up one day and made a conscious decision to try and be well known. Where do they expect to draw the line?
I'm still not clear. Would you or wouldn't you?Let's be clear, they are not well known for some kind of sporting achievement or for heroically tackling a gunman on a plane or giving to charity and can therefore rightfully try to stay out of the limelight or avoid speculation on their private life. They are well known because they woke up one day and made a conscious decision to try and be well known. Where do they expect to draw the line?
moanthebairns said:
right seriously, who the f
k is JoannaFBenz.
I'm 28 and I feel like I'm 50 when I hear people go on about instagram and st like that, Christ I just got facebook and that's st. Who are these people. Wtf has she done, as far as I can see she hasn't even got her fking knee down and we all know that's the threshold for people listening to you....how has she breached this.
That one of the most coherent and informed things I've seen you post. Who are you and what have you done with MTB?k is JoannaFBenz.I'm 28 and I feel like I'm 50 when I hear people go on about instagram and s
t like that, Christ I just got facebook and that's st. Who are these people. Wtf has she done, as far as I can see she hasn't even got her fking knee down and we all know that's the threshold for people listening to you....how has she breached this. Richyboy said:
Silent1 said:
Sadly she's also an idiot, her son has autism and she believes food and vaccines caused it and so has him on an incredibly restricted diet and thinks that his autism will be cured by alternative means.
Putting a foil hat on here. Don't they test for nagalase enzyme protein in cancer cases, the same stuff they put in vaccines and the same stuff found in high levels in autistic children? Restricted diet probably her only option. Nagalase ( alpha-N-acetylgalactosaminidase ) is a protein that is excreted by some cancers, this has the effect of blocking the production of GcMAF.
GcMAF is used in the creation of macrophages and macrophages are cells that can be used by the body in 'killing off' bad cells in the body such as cancer.
As a result testing for nagalase can be a useful test for detecting cancer.
I can't find any reliable studies or reports on nagalase being found in vaccines or high levels being found in children, all the studies I can find have either been retracted, are of extremely dubious quality or I'm unable to find anything more than a press release (usually posted on an anti-vaccine/autism website fwiw)
As for nagalase being controlled by a restricted diet, it's highly unlikely to work due to the way nagalase is produced and by the cells that produce it, any diet that keeps a human alive will be enough for the cells inside said human to produce nagalase. Obviously I'm heavily simplifying here, as writing on a phone isn't fun.
Allyc85 said:
graeme4130 said:
theshrew said:
3DP said:
Reardy Mister said:
Well maybe, were she not a deliberately public figure also. But if you put yourself in the public eye via social media, then hook up with someone else who has deliberately cultivated a public persona, you have invited discussion on both of you as individuals and as a couple. You can't say "Here is my life! Love me!" but disagree with the people who don't love you or become curious beyond what you present to the public.
Let's be clear, they are not well known for some kind of sporting achievement or for heroically tackling a gunman on a plane or giving to charity and can therefore rightfully try to stay out of the limelight or avoid speculation on their private life. They are well known because they woke up one day and made a conscious decision to try and be well known. Where do they expect to draw the line?
I'm still not clear. Would you or wouldn't you?Let's be clear, they are not well known for some kind of sporting achievement or for heroically tackling a gunman on a plane or giving to charity and can therefore rightfully try to stay out of the limelight or avoid speculation on their private life. They are well known because they woke up one day and made a conscious decision to try and be well known. Where do they expect to draw the line?
Silent1 said:
Richyboy said:
Silent1 said:
Sadly she's also an idiot, her son has autism and she believes food and vaccines caused it and so has him on an incredibly restricted diet and thinks that his autism will be cured by alternative means.
Putting a foil hat on here. Don't they test for nagalase enzyme protein in cancer cases, the same stuff they put in vaccines and the same stuff found in high levels in autistic children? Restricted diet probably her only option. Nagalase ( alpha-N-acetylgalactosaminidase ) is a protein that is excreted by some cancers, this has the effect of blocking the production of GcMAF.
GcMAF is used in the creation of macrophages and macrophages are cells that can be used by the body in 'killing off' bad cells in the body such as cancer.
As a result testing for nagalase can be a useful test for detecting cancer.
I can't find any reliable studies or reports on nagalase being found in vaccines or high levels being found in children, all the studies I can find have either been retracted, are of extremely dubious quality or I'm unable to find anything more than a press release (usually posted on an anti-vaccine/autism website fwiw)
As for nagalase being controlled by a restricted diet, it's highly unlikely to work due to the way nagalase is produced and by the cells that produce it, any diet that keeps a human alive will be enough for the cells inside said human to produce nagalase. Obviously I'm heavily simplifying here, as writing on a phone isn't fun.
t, just like that fking Andrew Wakefield spouted before he was done for fraud and stripped of his GMC status.Just more hippies coming up with more b
ks. I read some of the websites and the level of misinformation is actually dangerous, but some homeopathic water quaffing idiot will believe it, then deny their kids vaccines which could save their child's life or someone elses. Like the nurse who died of measles the other year because some ignorant tt didn't vaccinate their kid despite clear guidance to do so.The new age bulls
tters are far more dangerous than big pharma. Pharma only ever came after your wallet, these fkers are coming for your kids.Apologies if already posted
Was looking for Ariel ace vids and found one. Baron was riding it. With Al fagan following
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r6m9W4ekcKk
Was looking for Ariel ace vids and found one. Baron was riding it. With Al fagan following
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r6m9W4ekcKk
Prof Prolapse said:
There are no reliable studies. It's utter bullst, just like that fking Andrew Wakefield spouted before he was done for fraud and stripped of his GMC status.
Just more hippies coming up with more bks. I read some of the websites and the level of misinformation is actually dangerous, but some homeopathic water quaffing idiot will believe it, then deny their kids vaccines which could save their child's life or someone elses. Like the nurse who died of measles the other year because some ignorant tt didn't vaccinate their kid despite clear guidance to do so.
The new age bullstters are far more dangerous than big pharma. Pharma only ever came after your wallet, these fkers are coming for your kids.
This +1000t, just like that fking Andrew Wakefield spouted before he was done for fraud and stripped of his GMC status.Just more hippies coming up with more b
ks. I read some of the websites and the level of misinformation is actually dangerous, but some homeopathic water quaffing idiot will believe it, then deny their kids vaccines which could save their child's life or someone elses. Like the nurse who died of measles the other year because some ignorant tt didn't vaccinate their kid despite clear guidance to do so.The new age bulls
tters are far more dangerous than big pharma. Pharma only ever came after your wallet, these fkers are coming for your kids.Prof Prolapse said:
There are no reliable studies. It's utter bullst, just like that fking Andrew Wakefield spouted before he was done for fraud and stripped of his GMC status.
Just more hippies coming up with more bks. I read some of the websites and the level of misinformation is actually dangerous, but some homeopathic water quaffing idiot will believe it, then deny their kids vaccines which could save their child's life or someone elses. Like the nurse who died of measles the other year because some ignorant tt didn't vaccinate their kid despite clear guidance to do so.
The new age bullstters are far more dangerous than big pharma. Pharma only ever came after your wallet, these fkers are coming for your kids.
Wow you really do talk a lot of st, just like that fking Andrew Wakefield spouted before he was done for fraud and stripped of his GMC status.Just more hippies coming up with more b
ks. I read some of the websites and the level of misinformation is actually dangerous, but some homeopathic water quaffing idiot will believe it, then deny their kids vaccines which could save their child's life or someone elses. Like the nurse who died of measles the other year because some ignorant tt didn't vaccinate their kid despite clear guidance to do so.The new age bulls
tters are far more dangerous than big pharma. Pharma only ever came after your wallet, these fkers are coming for your kids.t too.If you think people who have read or feel that somehow all these vaccines are not good for their kids are in somehow more dangerous then Big Pharma you have a screw f
king loose.Again as I work for living I dont have the internet time to debate this fully with you so I will revert to your mode of expletive use to remonstrate I think what your saying is full of s
t.Either you work for Big Pharma, you dont have kids which can influence your decision making... but your opinion is f
king wk.You sad f
kers need to stop having a go at this Jo person and getting a fking life. Renn Sport said:
Prof Prolapse said:
There are no reliable studies. It's utter bullst, just like that fking Andrew Wakefield spouted before he was done for fraud and stripped of his GMC status.
Just more hippies coming up with more bks. I read some of the websites and the level of misinformation is actually dangerous, but some homeopathic water quaffing idiot will believe it, then deny their kids vaccines which could save their child's life or someone elses. Like the nurse who died of measles the other year because some ignorant tt didn't vaccinate their kid despite clear guidance to do so.
The new age bullstters are far more dangerous than big pharma. Pharma only ever came after your wallet, these fkers are coming for your kids.
Wow you really do talk a lot of st, just like that fking Andrew Wakefield spouted before he was done for fraud and stripped of his GMC status.Just more hippies coming up with more b
ks. I read some of the websites and the level of misinformation is actually dangerous, but some homeopathic water quaffing idiot will believe it, then deny their kids vaccines which could save their child's life or someone elses. Like the nurse who died of measles the other year because some ignorant tt didn't vaccinate their kid despite clear guidance to do so.The new age bulls
tters are far more dangerous than big pharma. Pharma only ever came after your wallet, these fkers are coming for your kids.t too.If you think people who have read or feel that somehow all these vaccines are not good for their kids are in somehow more dangerous then Big Pharma you have a screw f
king loose.Again as I work for living I dont have the internet time to debate this fully with you so I will revert to your mode of expletive use to remonstrate I think what your saying is full of s
t.Either you work for Big Pharma, you dont have kids which can influence your decision making... but your opinion is f
king wk.You sad f
kers need to stop having a go at this Jo person and getting a fking life. t. As far as I remember he is some sort of PHD pharmaceutical R&D licencing guru. When I called him up asking for a cure for my pile he told me to stand on my head. Renn Sport said:
Prof Prolapse said:
There are no reliable studies. It's utter bullst, just like that fking Andrew Wakefield spouted before he was done for fraud and stripped of his GMC status.
Just more hippies coming up with more bks. I read some of the websites and the level of misinformation is actually dangerous, but some homeopathic water quaffing idiot will believe it, then deny their kids vaccines which could save their child's life or someone elses. Like the nurse who died of measles the other year because some ignorant tt didn't vaccinate their kid despite clear guidance to do so.
The new age bullstters are far more dangerous than big pharma. Pharma only ever came after your wallet, these fkers are coming for your kids.
Wow you really do talk a lot of st, just like that fking Andrew Wakefield spouted before he was done for fraud and stripped of his GMC status.Just more hippies coming up with more b
ks. I read some of the websites and the level of misinformation is actually dangerous, but some homeopathic water quaffing idiot will believe it, then deny their kids vaccines which could save their child's life or someone elses. Like the nurse who died of measles the other year because some ignorant tt didn't vaccinate their kid despite clear guidance to do so.The new age bulls
tters are far more dangerous than big pharma. Pharma only ever came after your wallet, these fkers are coming for your kids.t too.If you think people who have read or feel that somehow all these vaccines are not good for their kids are in somehow more dangerous then Big Pharma you have a screw f
king loose.Again as I work for living I dont have the internet time to debate this fully with you so I will revert to your mode of expletive use to remonstrate I think what your saying is full of s
t.Either you work for Big Pharma, you dont have kids which can influence your decision making... but your opinion is f
king wk.You sad f
kers need to stop having a go at this Jo person and getting a fking life. There's nothing worse than these big companies spending millions of pounds on research to come up with vaccines which save millions of childrens lifes.
The b
ds.I can honestly say there is not one person in the public eye who I honestly care about what they do in their own time or even that they talk about publicly. I might follow someone on instagram/twitter/youtube but I do not feel the need to communicate with them, unless asked to. Why are there so many people willing to tell people how to behave and what they are doing wrong? It's borderline mental. Anyway, there I go telling people I don't know they are mental, must offer myself some advice.
neelyp said:
Renn Sport said:
Prof Prolapse said:
There are no reliable studies. It's utter bullst, just like that fking Andrew Wakefield spouted before he was done for fraud and stripped of his GMC status.
Just more hippies coming up with more bks. I read some of the websites and the level of misinformation is actually dangerous, but some homeopathic water quaffing idiot will believe it, then deny their kids vaccines which could save their child's life or someone elses. Like the nurse who died of measles the other year because some ignorant tt didn't vaccinate their kid despite clear guidance to do so.
The new age bullstters are far more dangerous than big pharma. Pharma only ever came after your wallet, these fkers are coming for your kids.
Wow you really do talk a lot of st, just like that fking Andrew Wakefield spouted before he was done for fraud and stripped of his GMC status.Just more hippies coming up with more b
ks. I read some of the websites and the level of misinformation is actually dangerous, but some homeopathic water quaffing idiot will believe it, then deny their kids vaccines which could save their child's life or someone elses. Like the nurse who died of measles the other year because some ignorant tt didn't vaccinate their kid despite clear guidance to do so.The new age bulls
tters are far more dangerous than big pharma. Pharma only ever came after your wallet, these fkers are coming for your kids.t too.If you think people who have read or feel that somehow all these vaccines are not good for their kids are in somehow more dangerous then Big Pharma you have a screw f
king loose.Again as I work for living I dont have the internet time to debate this fully with you so I will revert to your mode of expletive use to remonstrate I think what your saying is full of s
t.Either you work for Big Pharma, you dont have kids which can influence your decision making... but your opinion is f
king wk.You sad f
kers need to stop having a go at this Jo person and getting a fking life. There's nothing worse than these big companies spending millions of pounds on research to come up with vaccines which save millions of childrens lifes.
The b
ds.Lol... yes a guy has a PhD so we he's right about everything! Queue applause! I know a good few people who have PhD’s and it doesn’t really phase me I am afraid. I am not awed by any perceived intellectual superiority.
All I am saying is that people should be able to exercise their freedom to choose or not to choose to vaccinate 'their' kids.
I don't give a f
k if you guys want to burn me at the stake for having this view. I also think big Pharma are s without the played out conspiracy theorist st being pushed at me. THEY ARE S!I think this Jo person has the right to choose and people should be allowed to differ in opinion without being lambasted for a point of view.
Anyway bored now… That’s really all I have to say. .. you guys can w
k each other off in a circle for all I care, if it validates you… Gassing Station | Biker Banter | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff