johns tvr rebuild part two

johns tvr rebuild part two

Author
Discussion

Engineer1949

Original Poster:

1,423 posts

145 months

Saturday 21st September 2013
quotequote all
Dave is very much involved but john has done my mapping from day one he knows what i want and we both work on the cars when on the rollers realy works well.

John

Engineer1949

Original Poster:

1,423 posts

145 months

Saturday 21st September 2013
quotequote all
No daz the shock adjustment is more than adequate for the stiffer springs you should theoretically use less damping with stiffer springs.

John

SILICONEKID343HP

14,997 posts

232 months

Saturday 21st September 2013
quotequote all
Engineer1949 said:
No daz the shock adjustment is more than adequate for the stiffer springs you should theoretically use less damping with stiffer springs.

John
Thanks so I could fit stiffer springs without sending them back to Nitron ..

Engineer1949

Original Poster:

1,423 posts

145 months

Saturday 21st September 2013
quotequote all
Absolutly just adjust damping accordingly

John

Engineer1949

Original Poster:

1,423 posts

145 months

Monday 23rd September 2013
quotequote all
been hard at it today had some marine stuff to sort but managed to get the clutch fitted and the gearbox replaced today just the propshaft exhaust and centre console to complete then back on the rollers.

john,





















SILICONEKID343HP

14,997 posts

232 months

Monday 23rd September 2013
quotequote all
What`s been done to the gearbox ?

Engineer1949

Original Poster:

1,423 posts

145 months

Tuesday 24th September 2013
quotequote all
In the end i have just gone through the box again rebuilt the remote mechanisum and replaced it more or less as it was there seems to be no major upgrades for the lt77 it already is the later suffice with the better pump and wider gears etc. so not a lot can be done will have to se how it goes.

John

brett84

1,291 posts

154 months

Sunday 29th September 2013
quotequote all
Hi John
Does your speedo work correctly? I changed mine out for one from EBT gauges and doesn't work, it's something I've just not got round to diagnosing yet but I'm wondering if you just did a straight swap over or if the wiring/signal/sender needed any modification to work. Did you keep the original sender and just swap gauges over?

Engineer1949

Original Poster:

1,423 posts

145 months

Monday 30th September 2013
quotequote all
No the dash has its own sensor which if you look back in the thread you will see how i got round the fitting of said sensor it also has a gps aerial for lap timing etc. both require wires run from location of aerial/sensor to the dash,and it is now very accurate as it is infinately adjustable insomuch as the number of pulses per mile can be set by increments of one.



John

brett84

1,291 posts

154 months

Monday 30th September 2013
quotequote all
thank you

spend

12,581 posts

252 months

Monday 30th September 2013
quotequote all
Engineer1949 said:
...it is now very accurate as it is infinately adjustable insomuch as the number of pulses per mile can be set by increments of one.
Still doesn't have magic algorithms to guess tyre deformation / inflation / deflation wink

Engineer1949

Original Poster:

1,423 posts

145 months

Monday 30th September 2013
quotequote all
sorry for the late report i took the car to emerald and john and i have got what we think is the best map for this particular engine, it is very very smooth loads of low end torque with the boost building smoothly all the way to 10.6 flat-out the graph with two lines is the old graph running the 95mm blower wheel and 240cc injectors at 3.1 bar fuelling the solid line is the new output figures and is just right getting a little bit rich at the top end to keep things under control heat and detonation wise the only alteration i have made is to turn of the 0 fuelling on lift of and added a little fuel above 2500rpm to stop popping and banging other than that all good for an old pre seep 4.0ltr

john













Engineer1949

Original Poster:

1,423 posts

145 months

Saturday 5th October 2013
quotequote all
made and fitted a splitter today its a variation on the gutter theme ,i actually used some 4in drain pipe slightly stiffer i was concerned guttering would deform with the wind pressure the blade is held by a shaped piece of galvanised plate 1,5mm which is in turn held by five 6mm set screws up into rivnuts the blade itself is slotted so should it foul on whatever it can slide from under the plate hopefully causing no body damage,


john










SILICONEKID343HP

14,997 posts

232 months

Saturday 5th October 2013
quotequote all
It`s fitted the wrong way ! Or is mine fitted the wrong way round ?

Edited by SILICONEKID343HP on Saturday 5th October 19:17

Engineer1949

Original Poster:

1,423 posts

145 months

Saturday 5th October 2013
quotequote all
Well daz thats a mute point but any wind deflecting type devices are normally shaped this way reference a rear wing etc. but frankly i dont think in the splitter instance it makes much difference as it will create a low pressure area behind the splitter whatever and this way round is less likely to create damage should it be caught.



John

Hoofa

3,151 posts

209 months

Saturday 5th October 2013
quotequote all
Stop pissing about daz

SILICONEKID343HP

14,997 posts

232 months

Saturday 5th October 2013
quotequote all
Hoofa said:
Stop pissing about daz
Mine is fitted the other way ,as per instruction .

Harrytsg

1,264 posts

163 months

Sunday 6th October 2013
quotequote all
SILICONEKID343HP said:
Hoofa said:
Stop pissing about daz
Mine is fitted the other way ,as per instruction .
Mine faces forward as per silicone's, is it wrong or doesn't it matter?

fausTVR

1,442 posts

151 months

Sunday 6th October 2013
quotequote all
I'd like to understand just how a splitter works. John, when you say it creates low pressure behind it, is that to draw air down through the engine bay and also pull the car downwards (down force)?

My take on this is that x amount of airflow goes under the nose, a splitter ruffles it up and so creates drag (lower pressure), but where's the trade-off? It's still x amount of air passing under IYSWIM.

pearly

242 posts

143 months

Sunday 6th October 2013
quotequote all
Hi John, I'm no expert but believe Daz has a point.
I think it has to face forwards which does create a small amount of drag on acceleration but altering air pressure thus drawing air out of the engine bay, cooling and preventing bonnet lift.
I think at high speed you will gain to much front end lift, making the car unstable.
Here's a couple of previous threads I found, complete with forward and rear facing debates laugh

http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...

http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...

I fancy fitting one myself, but I am also concerned about grounding and ripping it off, I've already cracked my number plate which sit's lower on mine to help with cooling.