iPhone 6s

Author
Discussion

ZesPak

24,450 posts

198 months

Thursday 10th September 2015
quotequote all
J4CKO said:
I get the impression that they are running out of ideas, or at least drip feeding them.
It's the same across the board for all manufacturers, isn't it?

Upgrading every year since the last couple of years seem a bit daft, but when you look at them with a generation or two a part, it makes sense. The camera of the S4 is not bad, but compare it to the one in the Galaxy S6 and it's another story altogether, same for the iPhone 5 -> 6.
From what I read, it could be that they are now using the same Sony sensor the Galaxy S6 uses, in which case, photo quality could be a big step forward from the iPhone 6 (which is far from bad in it's own right)!


Edited by ZesPak on Thursday 10th September 12:40

skene

2,318 posts

174 months

Thursday 10th September 2015
quotequote all
Mike29 said:
If you don't have £500 spare then you shouldn't be buying it
I totally agree with you, because that's not what I said.

clonmult

10,529 posts

211 months

Thursday 10th September 2015
quotequote all
ZesPak said:
It's the same across the board for all manufacturers, isn't it?

Upgrading every year since the last couple of years seem a bit daft, but when you look at them with a generation or two a part, it makes sense. The camera of the S4 is not bad, but compare it to the one in the Galaxy S6 and it's another story altogether, same for the iPhone 5 -> 6.
From what I read, it could be that they are now using the same Sony sensor the Galaxy S6 uses, in which case, photo quality could be a big step forward from the iPhone 6 (which is far from bad in it's own right)!
Yup, all that they're all doing is minor point changes in spec. Nothing radical at any point in the last few years.

Interesting that the live photos and 3D touch, both of which were implemented by Nokia (although 3D touch was dropped) and a while after Apple brought in some ex Nokia engineers, the same appear on the iDevices. Difference being that 3D Touch as demonstrated on the unreleased Nokias was a lot more intriguing.

The Galaxy S6 uses a 16mp sensor. The new iPhone is using a 12mp sensor. Could be the same, but that would mean that Apple are cropping the sensor, or maybe using the additional area for digital image stabilisation.

ZesPak

24,450 posts

198 months

Thursday 10th September 2015
quotequote all
clonmult said:
The Galaxy S6 uses a 16mp sensor. The new iPhone is using a 12mp sensor. Could be the same, but that would mean that Apple are cropping the sensor, or maybe using the additional area for digital image stabilisation.
Good point, from the teardowns I've seen I know that (especially in the regular 6), the iPhone 6 doesn't have room for the Sony sensor. Maybe they moved about some stuff and cropped the sensor as you said.

clonmult

10,529 posts

211 months

Thursday 10th September 2015
quotequote all
ZesPak said:
clonmult said:
The Galaxy S6 uses a 16mp sensor. The new iPhone is using a 12mp sensor. Could be the same, but that would mean that Apple are cropping the sensor, or maybe using the additional area for digital image stabilisation.
Good point, from the teardowns I've seen I know that (especially in the regular 6), the iPhone 6 doesn't have room for the Sony sensor. Maybe they moved about some stuff and cropped the sensor as you said.
The funny thing about all these companies using the Sony sensors (heck, even my Voda Smart Ultra 6 uses a Sony 13mp unit) is that they all seem to make better use of the sensor than Sony themselves. Hoping that the Z5 is a return to Sony actually doing a decent implementation ...

J4CKO

41,788 posts

202 months

Thursday 10th September 2015
quotequote all
ZesPak said:
J4CKO said:
I get the impression that they are running out of ideas, or at least drip feeding them.
It's the same across the board for all manufacturers, isn't it?

Upgrading every year since the last couple of years seem a bit daft, but when you look at them with a generation or two a part, it makes sense. The camera of the S4 is not bad, but compare it to the one in the Galaxy S6 and it's another story altogether, same for the iPhone 5 -> 6.
From what I read, it could be that they are now using the same Sony sensor the Galaxy S6 uses, in which case, photo quality could be a big step forward from the iPhone 6 (which is far from bad in it's own right)!


Edited by ZesPak on Thursday 10th September 12:40
I work with databases and its the same, no huge leaps in the software really, all detail changes and the odd new feature that is only any use in a few scenarios.

Mike29

822 posts

113 months

Thursday 10th September 2015
quotequote all
skene said:
I totally agree with you, because that's not what I said.
Point still stands
You said you don't have it lying about for a phone

skene

2,318 posts

174 months

Thursday 10th September 2015
quotequote all
Mike29 said:
Point still stands
You said you don't have it lying about for a phone
I'm not a managing director, but I am in a sound financial state. And I don't want to derail this thread.

Original Poster

5,429 posts

178 months

Thursday 10th September 2015
quotequote all
Mike29 said:
Point still stands
You said you don't have it lying about for a phone
Such moronic people on here recently.

Mike29

822 posts

113 months

Thursday 10th September 2015
quotequote all
Original Poster said:
Such moronic people on here recently.
Agree. Why purchase something worth 500 quid on finance when you don't even have it spare. Nuts.

Graham

16,368 posts

286 months

Thursday 10th September 2015
quotequote all
Welshbeef said:
As I keep saying its effectively CHEAPER on contract than to buy.


Head banging against the wall.
Indeed I looked at this last time when I bought the 128 gb 6+ to buy the same phone outright and get the same data package was going to work out more cost and more hastle than getting the phone on contract.

i did the same on a load of ipads for work, the 2 year deal for the pads plus data was less than the cost of the pad, go figure...

I dont get the if you dont have 500 quid dont get the phone as the phone is only part of the cost and its not as if your going to keep it forever, i just see the phone as a total monthly expense ( its business and private) my 6+ is a year old now, and it should last me another of couple of years and then i'll probably change it for a 7s as the battery will be knackered by then, and I'll go through the same process it its cheaper and more convenient to buy it and have a separate air time package i'll do it if not i'll stick it all on the contract.

mind you in 2 years time an iphone will either be £99.99 or £999.99 depending which way they go on pricing lol

Graham

16,368 posts

286 months

Thursday 10th September 2015
quotequote all
Mike29 said:
Agree. Why purchase something worth 500 quid on finance when you don't even have it spare. Nuts.
why is it nuts if the total cost phone + air time is the same or similar.. it would be nuts to by a depreciating asset with your own capital if you dont have to

Richyboy

3,741 posts

219 months

Thursday 10th September 2015
quotequote all
So smaller battery to give room for all the new gubbins.

Zoon

6,727 posts

123 months

Thursday 10th September 2015
quotequote all
ZesPak said:
On 4G, with a lot of music streaming, I easily chew through several GB's/month.
Do you not have broadband?

Not sure how many hours a day equate to a GB of music, but I'm sure it's a fair bit.

Paul_M3

2,378 posts

187 months

Thursday 10th September 2015
quotequote all
Welshbeef said:
As I keep saying its effectively CHEAPER on contract than to buy.


Head banging against the wall.
It don't think contract is cheaper though, it is? Because you can get good cashback deals on SIM only.

This is what I've now decided to do:

iPhone 6S 128GB outright: £699
EE SIM only (one year contract) - Unlimited Calls & Texts + 4GB Data: £20.99 per month - £144 Cashback = £8.99 / month.
Lets assume you can get an identical SIM only deal in year two. (Which isn't an unreasonable assumption)

Total cost = £699 + (£8.99 x 24) = £914.76

Can anyone find a contract deal that's within £250 of that deal over 2 years?

justanother5tar

1,314 posts

127 months

Thursday 10th September 2015
quotequote all
Mike29 said:
Agree. Why purchase something worth 500 quid on finance when you don't even have it spare. Nuts.
Why purchase a £15k car on finance when you don't even have it spare?

Because people want 'things'. And there is an option to lend the full amount and pay it back in manageable lumps, instead of saving forever for it. Not everyone is as bothered as paying for everything in cash.


Zoon said:
ZesPak said:
On 4G, with a lot of music streaming, I easily chew through several GB's/month.
Do you not have broadband?

Not sure how many hours a day equate to a GB of music, but I'm sure it's a fair bit.
I can do 15GB/month easily, using the WiFi when I'm at home. All my data is when I'm out and about.

Welshbeef

49,633 posts

200 months

Thursday 10th September 2015
quotequote all
Paul_M3 said:
Welshbeef said:
As I keep saying its effectively CHEAPER on contract than to buy.


Head banging against the wall.
It don't think contract is cheaper though, it is? Because you can get good cashback deals on SIM only.

This is what I've now decided to do:

iPhone 6S 128GB outright: £699
EE SIM only (one year contract) - Unlimited Calls & Texts + 4GB Data: £20.99 per month - £144 Cashback = £8.99 / month.
Lets assume you can get an identical SIM only deal in year two. (Which isn't an unreasonable assumption)

Total cost = £699 + (£8.99 x 24) = £914.76

Can anyone find a contract deal that's within £250 of that deal over 2 years?
That's a fair deal overall £38pcm - however it's only 4Gb per month .. No use to me as I need the 20Gb.
Also as I use my phone for work as well as personal, and expense back an agreed amount which would mean that 20Gb PCM and unlimited text and calls. Anyway essentially I can run two phones rolling bi annual replacement for the effective rate of £15pcm wink.

ZesPak

24,450 posts

198 months

Thursday 10th September 2015
quotequote all
Zoon said:
ZesPak said:
On 4G, with a lot of music streaming, I easily chew through several GB's/month.
Do you not have broadband?

Not sure how many hours a day equate to a GB of music, but I'm sure it's a fair bit.
Yep, all on the road I'm afraid. Nearly no video either. Mind you, got a 10GB contract and never breached it.

Digitalize

2,850 posts

137 months

Thursday 10th September 2015
quotequote all
No idea why you're all looking at EE, it's so overpriced.

Three. So much cheaper, and better.

Welshbeef

49,633 posts

200 months

Thursday 10th September 2015
quotequote all
Digitalize said:
No idea why you're all looking at EE, it's so overpriced.

Three. So much cheaper, and better.
Been there never again.

EE British call centres who answer very quickly and know exactly how to speak English.
3G diabolical customer service & they constantly try to upsell. Try getting through and when you do they are inept one even once asked me about EastEnders and dirty den..... (While some screen was loading up)


Personally I want to give jobs to British people in our country not some call centre other siege of the world where you literally struggle to understand them and more often than not they don't have a clue what you are asking.


(Note I've done EE/3G/O2/Vodaphone/TMobile - not done orange. Without question in near on 20years EE is by far the best. )