Post your AI images
Discussion
Problem with Bing is that by and large it's great, but the little details let it down.
For example I did a little experiment yesterday. My prompt was simple, just four words: 'girl on a plane.' Followed by my usual, 'photorealism, hyperrealism, highly detailed' of course. So after a few seconds, out popped my four pictures.
Here's the first one, looks really good - the lighting, the texture of her skin, the details of her headgear are amazing. Hair looks a little odd, which is strange as it's usually quite good at that. But have another look ...
... what about the wingtip outside the window? It's completely wrong. To see it from this angle, it would have to be bent right back. We should be seeing the rest of the wing with it.
So on to number 2. Again, lighting, clothes, skin, hair all looks great. Until we look out the window ...
... what is that monstrosity outside? Again, one small detail that ruins the whole thing.
So let's see if number three is any better. Well, lighting, leather of the seat, the girl's hair are all great. But wait a minute ...
... where's her left arm gone?
Losing the will to live, I press on. And the last one is fine!
For example I did a little experiment yesterday. My prompt was simple, just four words: 'girl on a plane.' Followed by my usual, 'photorealism, hyperrealism, highly detailed' of course. So after a few seconds, out popped my four pictures.
Here's the first one, looks really good - the lighting, the texture of her skin, the details of her headgear are amazing. Hair looks a little odd, which is strange as it's usually quite good at that. But have another look ...
... what about the wingtip outside the window? It's completely wrong. To see it from this angle, it would have to be bent right back. We should be seeing the rest of the wing with it.
So on to number 2. Again, lighting, clothes, skin, hair all looks great. Until we look out the window ...
... what is that monstrosity outside? Again, one small detail that ruins the whole thing.
So let's see if number three is any better. Well, lighting, leather of the seat, the girl's hair are all great. But wait a minute ...
... where's her left arm gone?
Losing the will to live, I press on. And the last one is fine!
FourWheelDrift said:
Penultimate image, where's the aisle gone? Looks light and then it's blocked by a seat. The aisle has seats in it if you look at where they are compared to the ceiling.
It's the same with many of the pictures. It seems to be really st with perspective the relative positions of objects. Even gaming engines from 20 years ago were better than that.maffski said:
Strangely Brown said:
Maybe it's just me but I can see there may be teensy weensy problem with those open funnels on a submarine?
Given the history of the K class you might have a point: RN Subs - Steam SubmarinesBeen experimenting the last few days, trying to recreate this extremely ancient photo, scanned from a negative taken by a very basic camera - probably no more advanced than the one she is holding! (Face obscured to protect the guilty.)
|https://thumbsnap.com/Qv6J4SoR[/url]
As I went on, the text grew longer and longer, until it had reached War And Peace proportions!
I have changed some of the text for this post, but this is the type of thing:
"Photo in a photo album, together with other different photos, showing an English girl, 22, dark green eyes, shoulder length straight black hair, fringe, freckles, black glasses, red high-neck sweater, black jeans, head tilted slightly to one side, standing in a green field with a drystone wall behind, holding a compact camera, smiling, seen from slightly above, standard lens, late afternoon, photorealism, hyperrealism, highly detailed"
And this is the type of thing I got:
Sometimes it missed out the glasses, or the camera, or both, sometimes she was sitting down.
But I can post some of the eventtual pictures without qualms, for the simple reason that none of them looked even remotely like her!
[url]
|https://thumbsnap.com/Qv6J4SoR[/url]
As I went on, the text grew longer and longer, until it had reached War And Peace proportions!
I have changed some of the text for this post, but this is the type of thing:
"Photo in a photo album, together with other different photos, showing an English girl, 22, dark green eyes, shoulder length straight black hair, fringe, freckles, black glasses, red high-neck sweater, black jeans, head tilted slightly to one side, standing in a green field with a drystone wall behind, holding a compact camera, smiling, seen from slightly above, standard lens, late afternoon, photorealism, hyperrealism, highly detailed"
And this is the type of thing I got:
Sometimes it missed out the glasses, or the camera, or both, sometimes she was sitting down.
But I can post some of the eventtual pictures without qualms, for the simple reason that none of them looked even remotely like her!
[url]
Gassing Station | Computers, Gadgets & Stuff | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff