Laptop: Is this a good deal?
Author
Discussion

thebullettrain

Original Poster:

1,069 posts

268 months

Tuesday 22nd March 2005
quotequote all
It's all in, vat and delivery, for £550.

Intel Centrino Mobile 1.5GHz Processor (1Mb L2 Cache), 512 MB DDR RAM, 40GB Hard Disk Drive, 15" Widescreen TFT Colour Screen, DVD/CD-RW Combo Drive, nVidia GeForce FX Go 5200 64 MB Graphics Card, 56K Modem, 10/100 LAN, Wireless LAN, 1x Microphone jack, 1x Line-in jack, 1x Line-out jack, 1x PC card slot (type 1/2), 1x Infrared, 2x USB 2.0, 1x FireWire (4-pin), 1x Parallel, 1x External VGA, 1x S-Video (7-pin), 1x Security lock point, Works 7.0, Windows XP Home Operating System
1-Year RTB Warranty.

tinman0

18,231 posts

269 months

Tuesday 22nd March 2005
quotequote all
Not a bad deal at all. At least they put decent graphic chips on laptops nowadays.

thebullettrain

Original Poster:

1,069 posts

268 months

Tuesday 22nd March 2005
quotequote all
Cheers pal. I've already ordered it, so I will on tenterhooks not knowing what the first reply would be!

Dr Strangelove

419 posts

262 months

Tuesday 22nd March 2005
quotequote all
that slowww processor will get on your nerves after a short while...

thebullettrain

Original Poster:

1,069 posts

268 months

Tuesday 22nd March 2005
quotequote all
I just want a half decent system for watching DVD's and surfing the net and downloading music – surely it will manage that?

Plotloss

67,280 posts

299 months

Tuesday 22nd March 2005
quotequote all
Admirably.

Its a good deal without question.

pzero64

2,144 posts

270 months

Tuesday 22nd March 2005
quotequote all
£200 cash in Asda car park.

wolves_wanderer

12,951 posts

266 months

Tuesday 22nd March 2005
quotequote all
Dr Strangelove said:
that slowww processor will get on your nerves after a short while...



A centrino 1.5 isn't that slow

Mr E

23,029 posts

288 months

Tuesday 22nd March 2005
quotequote all
Dr Strangelove said:
that slowww processor will get on your nerves after a short while...



There's a crap load more to CPU performance than Mhz.

The 1.6GHz Pentium Mobile in my laptop is lots better than the 2.6Gig P IV in my desktop.

pmanson

13,388 posts

282 months

Tuesday 22nd March 2005
quotequote all
Yep i've got an IBM T42 1.6 Centrino (with 1Gb of ram) and it flies along!

whoateallthepies

4,292 posts

263 months

Tuesday 22nd March 2005
quotequote all
Dr Strangelove said:
that slowww processor will get on your nerves after a short while...



On the contrary, the 1.5Ghz Centrino should run at the same sort of clock speed as a 3ghz P4 (all to do with bus speeds and stuff)

Seems like a good spec-who's the manufacturer/where from?

Nacnud

2,190 posts

298 months

Tuesday 22nd March 2005
quotequote all
Yup - not bad.....

Just finished installing a new laptop for the GF
Dell Inspriron 510M with similar spec to yours but downgraded to 1.3GHz Celeron and upgraded to include 60Gb disc, 15" SXGA resolution and carry case for £594.84 inclusing of VAT and P&P.

I reckon we've both got cracking deals.
Yours a Dell as well ?

thebullettrain

Original Poster:

1,069 posts

268 months

Tuesday 22nd March 2005
quotequote all
Sorry for the late reply, mine is an Advent from a website – not sure if I'm allowed to post it. If I can let me know and I will.

Plotloss

67,280 posts

299 months

Tuesday 22nd March 2005
quotequote all
As long as you arent the owner of Advent, post away...

thebullettrain

Original Poster:

1,069 posts

268 months

Tuesday 22nd March 2005
quotequote all
Alas I'm not. The address is www.cheap-it.com/ some systems are refurbished, others ex demo and a few brand new. Mine falls in the final category.

Dr Strangelove

419 posts

262 months

Tuesday 22nd March 2005
quotequote all
...and the WiFi will be slow, assuming that this is important to you. As for processor speeds, all the points taken regards bus speed, cache, etc. My point about the processor was that a 1.5ghz is slower than faster centrinos. And i say again, he will get soon fed up with the lack of grunt. As for comparing Centrino with Pentiums, I didn't. But since some of you do... as the yanks say, 'ain't no substitute for horses'. Try fully loading both (speed) comparable processors, with a full winxp 2003 OS, load a few MS office Apps, load a few web browsers, chuck in the the usual flotsam of all things security related, do some proper work on it, and then tell me why, given the choice people are still speccing P4s. my underlying point is, you (usually) get what you pay for, and once he gets beyond 'what he bought it for' he will yearn for more HP...

Nacnud

2,190 posts

298 months

Wednesday 23rd March 2005
quotequote all
That's why I run an Inspiron 9100 with a 3.2GHz P4 HT. It was bought when this model first came out and is distinctly not budget. I couldn't/wouldn't spend this much if it were my money.

The GF wanted an affordable laptop and doesn't need the grunt. The spec is a lot better than I was expecting for the money and it's more than acceptable - nuff said

-DeaDLocK-

3,368 posts

280 months

Thursday 24th March 2005
quotequote all
I've got a Vaio T1XP coming on Saturday!

Really looking forward to it.

ultimasimon

9,646 posts

287 months

Thursday 24th March 2005
quotequote all
Dr Strangelove said:
...and the WiFi will be slow, assuming that this is important to you. As for processor speeds, all the points taken regards bus speed, cache, etc. My point about the processor was that a 1.5ghz is slower than faster centrinos. And i say again, he will get soon fed up with the lack of grunt. As for comparing Centrino with Pentiums, I didn't. But since some of you do... as the yanks say, 'ain't no substitute for horses'. Try fully loading both (speed) comparable processors, with a full winxp 2003 OS, load a few MS office Apps, load a few web browsers, chuck in the the usual flotsam of all things security related, do some proper work on it, and then tell me why, given the choice people are still speccing P4s. my underlying point is, you (usually) get what you pay for, and once he gets beyond 'what he bought it for' he will yearn for more HP...



It depends really what you want it for. Most people buy a laptop for a portable PC. When this is the case then battery life is normally the reason to buy a centrino and not some stonking great desktop imitation laptop that guzzles batteries like an Irishman downs Guiness on St Patricks day. Don't forget even the powerful desktop replacement laptops have cut down processors so the performance in no where near as fast as the machines they 'pretend' to copy.

My 1.5Ghz centrino gives me 6 hours battery life when I am using the wifi, and I have no problems with wireless speed even at a measly 11mb. Considering my broadband is less than half of that whats the problem?

softwaresorcerer

437 posts

278 months

Thursday 24th March 2005
quotequote all
ultimasimon said:

Dr Strangelove said:
...and the WiFi will be slow, assuming that this is important to you. As for processor speeds, all the points taken regards bus speed, cache, etc. My point about the processor was that a 1.5ghz is slower than faster centrinos. And i say again, he will get soon fed up with the lack of grunt. As for comparing Centrino with Pentiums, I didn't. But since some of you do... as the yanks say, 'ain't no substitute for horses'. Try fully loading both (speed) comparable processors, with a full winxp 2003 OS, load a few MS office Apps, load a few web browsers, chuck in the the usual flotsam of all things security related, do some proper work on it, and then tell me why, given the choice people are still speccing P4s. my underlying point is, you (usually) get what you pay for, and once he gets beyond 'what he bought it for' he will yearn for more HP...




It depends really what you want it for. Most people buy a laptop for a portable PC. When this is the case then battery life is normally the reason to buy a centrino and not some stonking great desktop imitation laptop that guzzles batteries like an Irishman downs Guiness on St Patricks day. Don't forget even the powerful desktop replacement laptops have cut down processors so the performance in no where near as fast as the machines they 'pretend' to copy.

My 1.5Ghz centrino gives me 6 hours battery life when I am using the wifi, and I have no problems with wireless speed even at a measly 11mb. Considering my broadband is less than half of that whats the problem?



And it's a 10 quid update to replace the 11b miniPCI card with an 54M 11g miniPCI for faster network file transfers. Laptops aren't as fast as desktop machines, but in the real world, why would they be? Battery life and portability are key. My 1.6 Centrino (5+ hours battery) performs in the real world pretty much the same as a 2.4GHz P4. That's plenty for my requirements.