MGB V8 Roadsters

Author
Discussion

mph

Original Poster:

2,337 posts

282 months

Sunday 14th April
quotequote all
I'm seriously considering whether a V8 MGB Roadster will be my next classic.

Given that they're all individually built, the quality and specification varies wildly and there are some for sale that I wouldn't go near. The other end of the spectrum are the Frontline cars which are well out of my budget.

I've done my research on the subject and am familiar with the available options, brakes, suspension, gearboxes etc.

What I don't have is any first, or even second hand experience.

Common sense dictates that the car should be competently built and have the various ancillaries uprated to handle the extra power and performance.

I'd be interested to hear from anyone who has owned or driven a converted V8 Roadster. I'm particularly keen to get first hand accounts of the various rear suspension upgrades particularly from Frontline and Hoyle.





.




Texpis

235 posts

257 months

Sunday 14th April
quotequote all
Hi I have a V8 roadster I built myself 20 years ago I haven’t used any of the suspension systems you have mentioned but I a in the north east if you want to chat

Mick

Jordie Barretts sock

4,143 posts

19 months

Sunday 14th April
quotequote all
I'd be interested just from a curiosity point of view to know what you did for the conversion (apart from drop a Rover V8 in!).

Texpis

235 posts

257 months

Sunday 14th April
quotequote all
Well it’s a long time ago but I started with a rubber bumper as because it’s easier to convert. I overhauled and fitted a rover v8 3.5 with a Lt77 gearbox. There is a small amount of relief required in the tunnel and a shortened drive shaft. The oil filter is a remote filter using the original oil cooler. The ignition is a new electronic dizzy,the exhaust I used block huggers which was available at the time now the thing to do is the through the inner wing manifolds. The intake was originally a holly carb but I changed it to a copy of the MGB v8 t type intake with SUs mainly for the look and I am comfortable tuning SUs.
Suspension I lowered chrome bumper height rear with Lowe springs and blocks front wi5 lowering springs front shocks are V8 spec original and rear is tube shocks adjustable.
Brakes are original rear because they an are large on the 1980 MG the front are MgV8 disks with princes 4pot calipers.

There’s probably more but that’s what I remember

Texpis

235 posts

257 months

Sunday 14th April
quotequote all

Jordie Barretts sock

4,143 posts

19 months

Sunday 14th April
quotequote all
Thanks!

Not a horrific amount of work then? But I suppose because there was/is a GT V8 all the parts are interchangeable to an extent.

Mr Tidy

22,367 posts

127 months

Sunday 14th April
quotequote all
IIRC there was a guy called Ken Costello who was fitting Rover V8s to Roadsters before BL got around to making V8 GTs, and his conversions got good reviews back in period.

By the late 70s the MGB really needed a bit more than the 1,800cc OHV boat-anchor could deliver!

KingGary

111 posts

Sunday 14th April
quotequote all
A few people in the states have used LS1 engines in their conversions. There are a kits available for this.

mph

Original Poster:

2,337 posts

282 months

Sunday 14th April
quotequote all
Texpis said:
Well it’s a long time ago but I started with a rubber bumper as because it’s easier to convert. I overhauled and fitted a rover v8 3.5 with a Lt77 gearbox. There is a small amount of relief required in the tunnel and a shortened drive shaft. The oil filter is a remote filter using the original oil cooler. The ignition is a new electronic dizzy,the exhaust I used block huggers which was available at the time now the thing to do is the through the inner wing manifolds. The intake was originally a holly carb but I changed it to a copy of the MGB v8 t type intake with SUs mainly for the look and I am comfortable tuning SUs.
Suspension I lowered chrome bumper height rear with Lowe springs and blocks front wi5 lowering springs front shocks are V8 spec original and rear is tube shocks adjustable.
Brakes are original rear because they an are large on the 1980 MG the front are MgV8 disks with princes 4pot calipers.

There’s probably more but that’s what I remember
You've owned it for a long time - you must like it ! I'd love to build one from scratch but don't have the time or place. Also a lot cheaper to buy one ready done.

There are a few decent ones for sale - the difficulty is finding one without driving all over the UK.


Texpis

235 posts

257 months

Sunday 14th April
quotequote all
Well it’s been in the family for years I sold it to my sister she had it 15years I bought it back about 5 years ago. But yes I do like great fun to drive when the weather suits. Very active MG group round here if you’re into that.

Edited by Texpis on Sunday 14th April 21:30

Thebaggers

351 posts

133 months

Sunday 14th April
quotequote all
Mine is a GT but fully built myself, running a TVR 4.5 big valve and a coil over shock 4 point link rear end. Happy to help.




classicaholic

1,725 posts

70 months

Sunday 14th April
quotequote all
Hi Texpis, is the V8 much faster than a reasonably tuned 1.8?

Texpis

235 posts

257 months

Sunday 14th April
quotequote all
Hmmm wouldn’t like to comment never drove a well tuned 1.8 but the torque from the V8 is real fun on back roads and the sound is awesome

GTRene

16,567 posts

224 months

Sunday 14th April
quotequote all
tis looks cheap? first I thought incl hardtop, but thats excl, but I guess still not expensive for a MGB V8

1969 MG MGB Heritage shell build 3.9 V8

https://www.carandclassic.com/l/C1702055


GTRene

16,567 posts

224 months

Sunday 14th April
quotequote all
KingGary said:
A few people in the states have used LS1 engines in their conversions. There are a kits available for this.
ow? curious about those kits, I believe I've not seen those

also some good power I guess, does it also incl another rear axle/diff?

GTRene

16,567 posts

224 months

Sunday 14th April
quotequote all
Thebaggers said:
Mine is a GT but fully built myself, running a TVR 4.5 big valve and a coil over shock 4 point link rear end. Happy to help.



wow, looks good, love the Sebring look and sounds like a great engine such 4.5 BV around 300hp I guess? those make lovely sounds.

Thebaggers

351 posts

133 months

Sunday 14th April
quotequote all
GTRene said:
wow, looks good, love the Sebring look and sounds like a great engine such 4.5 BV around 300hp I guess? those make lovely sounds.
I think it is 340, it is one of the Tuscan challenge engines, have a dyno print somewhere. Side exits so it does make a good noise.

GTRene

16,567 posts

224 months

Sunday 14th April
quotequote all
Thebaggers said:
I think it is 340, it is one of the Tuscan challenge engines, have a dyno print somewhere. Side exits so it does make a good noise.
that is some good power!
ah, now you mentioned it, I do not see a rear exhaust hehe also no side exhaust in those pictures, 'sounds' like fun. clap
also great you made it yourself, very handy when you have to replace things, or find some troubles after some problem, you know the car inside out that way.

I once looked at one with a 4.3 BV in it and 300hp also sebring kit in the Netherlands long time ago, came across it when taking some other car route, so I stopped by that garage asking if it was for sale.

answer yes and no? hm, it had troubles to keep the drive axles in a good state, to the wheels or diff? forgot, he said, they could not fix the problem? it was on its third + axles or something, they even made stronger ones? so... whit that in mind at the time (long time ago) and me not that handy for all those sort problems (at the time no internet lol) so I decided to take his advise and drove on, but never completely forgot that one, looked very cool, also green. They used it for motorsport, but also had road plates.

TarquinMX5

1,950 posts

80 months

Monday 15th April
quotequote all
Mr Tidy said:
IIRC there was a guy called Ken Costello who was fitting Rover V8s to Roadsters before BL got around to making V8 GTs, and his conversions got good reviews back in period.

By the late 70s the MGB really needed a bit more than the 1,800cc OHV boat-anchor could deliver!
https://www.mgcostello.com/evolution-of-the-costello-v8#:~:text=Initial%20development%20of%20the%20Costello,Triumph)%20and%20bespoke%20%27block%2D

Autocar tested a Costello GT in May '72; at that time cars had gearbox uprated as per MGC, larger clutch (9.5 v 8.0"), 3.07 diff. I used to see one of the early ones regularly but not for many years now.


AW111

9,674 posts

133 months

Monday 15th April
quotequote all
TarquinMX5 said:
Mr Tidy said:
IIRC there was a guy called Ken Costello who was fitting Rover V8s to Roadsters before BL got around to making V8 GTs, and his conversions got good reviews back in period.

By the late 70s the MGB really needed a bit more than the 1,800cc OHV boat-anchor could deliver!
https://www.mgcostello.com/evolution-of-the-costello-v8#:~:text=Initial%20development%20of%20the%20Costello,Triumph)%20and%20bespoke%20%27block%2D

Autocar tested a Costello GT in May '72; at that time cars had gearbox uprated as per MGC, larger clutch (9.5 v 8.0"), 3.07 diff. I used to see one of the early ones regularly but not for many years now.
My understanding is that MG / BL had categorically stated tjat a v8 B was technically impossible, and were rather annoyed when Costello proved them wrong.