Evo IX running costs
Discussion
http://www.lancerregister.com/mlr_runningcostcalcu...
have a play around with that, will be a rough guide only I would have thought..
can't tell you about mine , only had it a few months and have just 5000 miles on it..
servicing costs can be reduced a fair bit by using an idependant specialist and will keep any warranty intact.. all the info you need is on the MLR have a look on the forums etc..
cheers
Dave
have a play around with that, will be a rough guide only I would have thought..
can't tell you about mine , only had it a few months and have just 5000 miles on it..
servicing costs can be reduced a fair bit by using an idependant specialist and will keep any warranty intact.. all the info you need is on the MLR have a look on the forums etc..
cheers
Dave
Pierscoe1 said:
are all evo's this bad for servicing (e.g. Evo7 / 8)
..and why is it the case.. it's just a turbo'd four, in the more standard versions producing no more than many other cars with turbo fours, that don't need the crazily frequent servicing.. what's so special about the evo lump?
they are squeezing an awful lot of power out of a 2.0 4-cylinder engine... and i think the servicing is mainly oil changes, checking strain etc....and why is it the case.. it's just a turbo'd four, in the more standard versions producing no more than many other cars with turbo fours, that don't need the crazily frequent servicing.. what's so special about the evo lump?
But your right - my 1.8 4-pot turbo with 225bhp goes 20k/2 yr between services. The new S3 has 280bhp from a 2.0 Turbo, with similar services.
Doesnt the scooby do 12k with same power/cc ?
Fidgits said:
Doesnt the scooby do 12k with same power/cc ?
Yes, although this is only the newer models, the older ones are every 6 months or 7.5k IIRC!Evo running cost have always been the major killer for me. I could do with four seats rather than the two of the 350Z, but whilst the Evo ticks a great many boxes, it's just too expensive really...
And whilst it's not a huge issue, compared to a tastfully sorted Scooby, it does sound a little bit too much like an overgrown Qualcast for me
is fuel economy really that bad on them?! The only turbocharged car ive owned is a GT4 (ST205) and that would get me in the region of 25-30 mpg (my daily commute is 30 miles, mostly motorway so 50-70mph depending on traffic
currently running a 350z and thats sitting on 26mpg average which isnt bad considering the size of the engine!
currently running a 350z and thats sitting on 26mpg average which isnt bad considering the size of the engine!
red_zed said:
is fuel economy really that bad on them?! The only turbocharged car ive owned is a GT4 (ST205) and that would get me in the region of 25-30 mpg (my daily commute is 30 miles, mostly motorway so 50-70mph depending on traffic
currently running a 350z and thats sitting on 26mpg average which isnt bad considering the size of the engine!
When a manufactuer quotes '20 MPG for mixed' you know its going to be very. very bad currently running a 350z and thats sitting on 26mpg average which isnt bad considering the size of the engine!
Gassing Station | Japanese Chat | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff