Acer laptops cheaper than the rest, why?

Acer laptops cheaper than the rest, why?

Author
Discussion

inman999

Original Poster:

25,593 posts

174 months

Friday 31st December 2010
quotequote all
My sisters wants a new laptop and asked me to have look to see what she can get for her £500 budget. Had a quick look at all the usual suspects and the Acer laptops are coming out cheaper like for like compared to Dell, HP etc. When I say like for like I mean processors, RAM, Hard drive and graphics card, about the limit of my knowledge.

Basically want to know if there's a catch and Acer's should be avoided.

Robert Burns

909 posts

170 months

Friday 31st December 2010
quotequote all
First laptop was a acer, it lasted 6 years.

Now got a acer thats been going for 3 years.

Only thing i have done to it, was a complete wipe. If you get any laptop, get rid of all the crap acer,dell,hp give you. Just crap.

Edited by Robert Burns on Friday 31st December 00:37

TheD

3,133 posts

200 months

Friday 31st December 2010
quotequote all
Because they are Pish. That of course is my own opinion and you will have a load of Acer fans telling you how great they are. In my line of work the Acer laptops are the ones we see most often and are never very old.

andym1603

1,814 posts

173 months

Friday 31st December 2010
quotequote all
Had an Acer Aspire 7735Z for just over a year now.
No problems with it apart from battery life.
Just use it plugged into the mains now.
Andy..

The real Apache

39,731 posts

285 months

Friday 31st December 2010
quotequote all
Had an Acer it was fine, not as good as the Dell but not as bad as the ste Tosh I have at the mo

Robert Burns

909 posts

170 months

Friday 31st December 2010
quotequote all
TheD said:
Because they are Pish. That of course is my own opinion and you will have a load of Acer fans telling you how great they are. In my line of work the Acer laptops are the ones we see most often and are never very old.
Do they still have the acer pish still on them, and then having aload of crap added on. Or is it that becuase the acer is cheaper people buy them so there more of them.

All laptops come with useless programs on them, If dell did a laptop that was £50 cheaper that all the rest, then you would get alot of dell's.

Treat a car well and it will run well, treat a computer crap it will stop.

Edited by Robert Burns on Friday 31st December 00:45

HereBeMonsters

14,180 posts

183 months

Friday 31st December 2010
quotequote all
I've seen HP and Sony laptops fail as often as Acer.

doodles19

2,201 posts

174 months

Friday 31st December 2010
quotequote all
(Insert apple fan boy speech here)

smile

C2james

4,685 posts

166 months

Friday 31st December 2010
quotequote all
I have an acer and it's really good in my opinion.

inman999

Original Poster:

25,593 posts

174 months

Friday 31st December 2010
quotequote all
Sounds good then.

I was/am worried that the parts I know very little about, motherboard etc are crap to reduce the costs.

The real Apache

39,731 posts

285 months

Friday 31st December 2010
quotequote all
inman999 said:
Sounds good then.

I was/am worried that the parts I know very little about, motherboard etc are crap to reduce the costs.
I should image that stuff like that is pretty generic, it's the mechanical bits that let you down......like a sagging battery compartment in my Tosh and it's ability to imagine the mouse function was asked to do anything

MikeGTi

2,509 posts

202 months

Friday 31st December 2010
quotequote all
doodles19 said:
(Insert apple fan boy speech here)

smile
+1
bowtie

Spree

73 posts

191 months

Friday 31st December 2010
quotequote all
I think the materials are cheaper. I have an Acer that I bought a few years ago. It was a good laptop and great value for money. Over time the battery did fail, the plastic started cracking in several places and some of the keys became less responsive. However I did use it very heavily for more than 4 years and despite the niggles it's still functional today as long as the battery is removed (new battery for it is only £40 and easy to change).

I would say go for it but don't expect the best quality materials and don't expect it to last forever if you are a heavy user.
On the other hand I must add that it was a good few years before it starting showing any signs of deterioration, no major parts failed e.g. motherboard and I did use it literally every day; so don't be put off, especially if your sister is a more casual user.

spants

1,056 posts

228 months

Friday 31st December 2010
quotequote all
Robert Burns said:
Do they still have the acer pish still on them, and then having aload of crap added on. Or is it that becuase the acer is cheaper people buy them so there more of them.

All laptops come with useless programs on them,
Try http://www.pcdecrapifier.com/

Tony

Famous Graham

26,553 posts

226 months

Friday 31st December 2010
quotequote all
Spree said:
I think the materials are cheaper. I have an Acer that I bought a few years ago. It was a good laptop and great value for money. Over time the battery did fail, the plastic started cracking in several places and some of the keys became less responsive. However I did use it very heavily for more than 4 years and despite the niggles it's still functional today as long as the battery is removed (new battery for it is only £40 and easy to change).

I would say go for it but don't expect the best quality materials and don't expect it to last forever if you are a heavy user.
On the other hand I must add that it was a good few years before it starting showing any signs of deterioration, no major parts failed e.g. motherboard and I did use it literally every day; so don't be put off, especially if your sister is a more casual user.
yes Exactly my experience as well, particularly the materials point. They feel a bit cheaper, but they're perfectly functional.

peterbredde

775 posts

201 months

Friday 31st December 2010
quotequote all
I get a very high spec Dell laptop with my job - duo core and tons of memory etc. I bought an e-machines (even lower budget machine made by Acer) for the wife and kids to wreck about 3 years ago. The only differences I notice are that the e-machines is more flimsy with a much lighter case and that the battery life is a lot shorter. There is no discernable difference in speed or reliability. It is an excellent little machine. I would buy another without any hesitation.

By the way, it replaced an ages old Acer which only died after repeated trips to the floor.

ApexJimi

25,025 posts

244 months

Friday 31st December 2010
quotequote all
MikeGTi said:
doodles19 said:
(Insert apple fan boy speech here)

smile
+1
bowtie
hehe

In all seriousness, when looking for my current laptop, I had a budget of 500 quid in mind, and was looking at getting an aspire. In the end, I ended up spending over 1100 quid on a MacBook hehe

Brilliant decision, the quality is quality is incomparable, and had I bought the acer, it would have been worth a third of bugger all by now.

Carrot

7,294 posts

203 months

Friday 31st December 2010
quotequote all
Been running acers for 7 years now and have sold loads to customers.

Never had a problem.

Hp on the other hand...

Engineer1

10,486 posts

210 months

Friday 31st December 2010
quotequote all
Acer are fine, I have had 2 both are a bit knackered now, one the battery died it's about 7 years old though so understandable on the newer one the motherboard lunched its self at about 2 years old.

ZesPak

24,439 posts

197 months

Friday 31st December 2010
quotequote all
HereBeMonsters said:
I've seen HP and Sony laptops fail as often as Acer.
This.
And you have to compare like-for-like, the business series (mid & high end, starting from £1000) of HP is very good, Elitebooks and the like, however, their "cheap" laptops (pavillions for example) are exactly that: cheap.

Acer are cheap, and you get what you pay for. Are they rubbish? Not in my opinion, but I would never buy a sub £700 laptop, as I think the majority of them are cheap in both senses of the word.