Jimmy Saville

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

Mill Wheel

6,149 posts

197 months

Wednesday 10th October 2012
quotequote all


No doubt in his mind... wardrobe malfunction!
Chap on the far left looks jealous!

RtdRacer

1,274 posts

202 months

Wednesday 10th October 2012
quotequote all
Mill Wheel said:
^^ THIS ^^

And as for Janet Street Porter saying in the Daily Wail yesterday that she had been expected to give a BJ - I find it hard to believe that somebody would be prepared to risk his tackle in between those teeth...!

She too should name names or shut up.

Wonder who it was though....
They have the very real problem now of being sued for slander, given that it will be *very* hard to prove anything after such a long time has passed. Shocking, but there you are.

NuisanceFactor

289 posts

185 months

Wednesday 10th October 2012
quotequote all

Triumph Man

8,699 posts

169 months

Wednesday 10th October 2012
quotequote all
NuisanceFactor said:
rofl

Red Devil

13,067 posts

209 months

Wednesday 10th October 2012
quotequote all
Given the systematic abuse of children by Catholic priests, does anyone find it supremely ironic that Savile received a papal knighthood (Knight Commander of the Order of Saint Gregory the Great)?

If he did do what is alleged one might be forgiven for thinking the 'gong' was a reward for his efforts.

anonymous-user

55 months

Wednesday 10th October 2012
quotequote all
The going rate for a Papal K is about 50K, paid via Fr Michael Seed.

daz3210

Original Poster:

5,000 posts

241 months

Wednesday 10th October 2012
quotequote all
Breadvan72 said:
The going rate for a Papal K is about 50K, paid via Fr Michael Seed.
It is interesting to see who has his name linked with that chap too. None other than the saintly Mr Blair...

anonymous-user

55 months

Wednesday 10th October 2012
quotequote all
St Tone is a git in many ways, but he's not a perv, as far as I am aware.

streaky

19,311 posts

250 months

Wednesday 10th October 2012
quotequote all
Mill Wheel said:
streaky said:
Mill Wheel said:
Janet Street Porter...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2214350/...



I'm not sure what the PH massive think of the way these girls are dressed - are they looking to impress, or is just for comfort...

They certainly seem to have got the attention of one person!
This will probably get me tagged as a 'perv', but is there a hint of wardrobe malfunction? Or is it a pixel failure on my iPad?

Streaky
To be honest, until you mentioned it I had not looked that closely, but you can relax - your iPad is fine, aside from the obvious failings inherent in owning an iPad - the beelzebub of tablet PCs, so my son tells me after he sold his!
Now you have "looked closely" ... Perv!

Streaky

daz3210

Original Poster:

5,000 posts

241 months

Wednesday 10th October 2012
quotequote all
The girl to the rear right of Sir Jim has a contented look on her face.....


y2blade

56,127 posts

216 months

Wednesday 10th October 2012
quotequote all
daz3210 said:
The girl to the rear right of Sir Jim has a contented look on her face.....
I think he had fishfingers.

Mill Wheel

6,149 posts

197 months

Wednesday 10th October 2012
quotequote all
streaky said:
ow you have "looked closely" ... Perv!

Streaky
Only in the interests of research - and I WAS accompanied by my wife who added her expert opinion!

daz3210

Original Poster:

5,000 posts

241 months

Wednesday 10th October 2012
quotequote all
Mill Wheel said:
Only in the interests of research - and I WAS accompanied by my wife who added her expert opinion!
What was the wife's opinion?

streaky

19,311 posts

250 months

Wednesday 10th October 2012
quotequote all
The list of those who knew grows: Brian Hitchens (for 45 years), Paul Connew (interviewed two credible women), Liz Kersha and Paul Gambaccini (an "open secret").

"And no-one said a thing."

The quote attributed to Edmund Burke comes to mind: "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing."

Streaky

PS - we'll know it's really bad when Cameron apologises for the BBC's (in)action - S

daz3210

Original Poster:

5,000 posts

241 months

Wednesday 10th October 2012
quotequote all
streaky said:
PS - we'll know it's really bad when Cameron apologises for the BBC's (in)action - S
But why does Cameron need to apologise? IF it is true it should be the bosses of the BBC. Talking of which, wasn't Rantzen married to a BBC high up at one stage?


daz3210

Original Poster:

5,000 posts

241 months

Wednesday 10th October 2012
quotequote all
I simply cannot believe the latest claim. Apparently Sir Jim groped Sophie, Countess of Wessex.

I simply do not believe if he did that he was not taken to task at the time.

streaky

19,311 posts

250 months

Wednesday 10th October 2012
quotequote all
daz3210 said:
streaky said:
PS - we'll know it's really bad when Cameron apologises for the BBC's (in)action - S
But why does Cameron need to apologise? IF it is true it should be the bosses of the BBC. Talking of which, wasn't Rantzen married to a BBC high up at one stage?
Where's that bl00dy parrot?

Streaky

Mill Wheel

6,149 posts

197 months

Thursday 11th October 2012
quotequote all
daz3210 said:
I simply cannot believe the latest claim. Apparently Sir Jim groped Sophie, Countess of Wessex.

I simply do not believe if he did that he was not taken to task at the time.
Not just for Streaky....

streaky

19,311 posts

250 months

Thursday 11th October 2012
quotequote all
Now it appears that staff at Stoke Manderville knew of him "cruising" the wards seeking girls to abuse. Before his "ward rounds", it is now suggested that staff advised potential targets to pretend to be asleep.

Nine police forces are now investigating complaints.

Certainly there will be some who try to jump on the band-wagon, but the weight of allegation and the names of some claiming to have knowledge (some very personal) is strongly suggestive that there is -and was - a case to answer.

However, we should be careful not to judge wholly by the mores of today - a mistake too easily and too often made.

Streaky

anonymous-user

55 months

Thursday 11th October 2012
quotequote all
Huh? In the mores of the 1950s to 1990s, was it OK to grope minors and patients? Moral relativism is a dodgy concept here, I think.
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED