Jimmy Saville

[decadence]

The family removing his grave stone was the clincher for me, they must of known it would come out eventually. The only real question now is was their a cover up within the Beeb and why did the newspapers / friends / colleagues turn a blind eye to it all?
The excuse that he held them to random with the charity work doesnt stack up...

He got away with it because he's gone now, but he's left his family to pick up the pieces.

[XCP]

You can call him whatever you want. It's just that some people prefer accuracy.
Paediatricians particularly.

[Bitofbully]

decadence said:

Only on a forum could people when discussing child abuse pick up on the fact you can't call someone a Paedo cause the children they abused we're over a certain age! Unruddybelievable!!

Jimmy Savile it is pretty clear was a raging Paedo....... says the Sun...(covers me)

I suggest you pick up a dictionary and look at the definitions, then.

This will help:

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=p...

Now, haven't you got to go and stone a paediatrician?

[decadence]

Bitofbully said:

decadence said:

Only on a forum could people when discussing child abuse pick up on the fact you can't call someone a Paedo cause the children they abused we're over a certain age! Unruddybelievable!!

Jimmy Savile it is pretty clear was a raging Paedo....... says the Sun...(covers me)

I suggest you pick up a dictionary and look at the definitions, then.

This will help:

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=p...

Now, haven't you got to go and stone a paediatrician?

My point was your more bothered that someone who abuses kids is called the correct name for it, when really you should be bothered that pervs abuse children...
If you fiddle with and abuse children...your a Paedophile in my book, whether they be 15 or 5, you need a massive kicking.....the rest is just details....

BTW Jesse Bering looks like a hebephile......

Edited by decadence on Thursday 11th October 18:33

[Bitofbully]

decadence said:

My point was your more bothered that someone who abuses kids is called the correct name for it, when really you should be bothered that pervs abuse children...
If you fiddle with and abuse children...your a Paedophile in my book, whether they be 15 or 5, you need a massive kicking.....the rest is just details....

BTW Jesse Bering looks like a hebephile......

Yeah, why use the correct word when the wrong one will do, eh?

It's "you're", BTW.

[Oakey]

decadence said:

Only on a forum could people when discussing child abuse pick up on the fact you can't call someone a Paedo cause the children they abused we're over a certain age! Unruddybelievable!!

Jimmy Savile it is pretty clear was a raging Paedo....... says the Sun...(covers me)

Yeah, they ignore that some girls go through puberty at an early age and others can start late. I mean, fking a 10yr old who has started puberty doesn't make you a paedo apparently but fking a 12yr old that hasn't would. Whichever way you cut it, he's still a nonce.

[decadence]

Oakey said:

decadence said:

Only on a forum could people when discussing child abuse pick up on the fact you can't call someone a Paedo cause the children they abused we're over a certain age! Unruddybelievable!!

Jimmy Savile it is pretty clear was a raging Paedo....... says the Sun...(covers me)

Yeah, they ignore that some girls go through puberty at an early age and others can start late. I mean, fking a 10yr old who has started puberty doesn't make you a paedo apparently but fking a 12yr old that hasn't would. Whichever way you cut it, he's still a nonce.

This ^^^^^

[decadence]

Bitofbully said:

decadence said:

My point was your more bothered that someone who abuses kids is called the correct name for it, when really you should be bothered that pervs abuse children...
If you fiddle with and abuse children...your a Paedophile in my book, whether they be 15 or 5, you need a massive kicking.....the rest is just details....

BTW Jesse Bering looks like a hebephile......

Yeah, why use the correct word when the wrong one will do, eh?

It's "you're", BTW.

Cause frankly if some to55er drunk driver ran over and killed a member of my family i'd call then a murdering and hunt them down....if some prat then chirped up and said "actually..i think you'll find its manslaughter..." like some snotty little nonce...its details that frankly i dont care for...you would deserve to die regardless of what you 'should' be called...understand?
get me?

[Bitofbully]

decadence said:

Cause frankly if some to55er drunk driver ran over and killed a member of my family i'd call then a murdering and hunt them down....if some prat then chirped up and said "actually..i think you'll find its manslaughter..." like some snotty little nonce...its details that frankly i dont care for...you would deserve to die regardless of what you 'should' be called...understand?
get me?

Grab that pitchfork, you've a witch to hunt. And a tabloid to read.

[decadence]

Bitofbully said:

decadence said:

Cause frankly if some to55er drunk driver ran over and killed a member of my family i'd call then a murdering and hunt them down....if some prat then chirped up and said "actually..i think you'll find its manslaughter..." like some snotty little nonce...its details that frankly i dont care for...you would deserve to die regardless of what you 'should' be called...understand?
get me?

Grab that pitchfork, you've a witch to hunt. And a tabloid to read.

I read the Guardian and I'm extremely middle class. But I still can't be an apologist for Nonces. Never.

[longblackcoat]

decadence said:

Cause frankly if some to55er drunk driver ran over and killed a member of my family i'd call then a murdering and hunt them down....if some prat then chirped up and said "actually..i think you'll find its manslaughter..." like some snotty little nonce...its details that frankly i dont care for...you would deserve to die regardless of what you 'should' be called...understand?
get me?

You'd hunt them down and kill them?

Big words. But we all know that's not actually what you would do.

[Bitofbully]

decadence said:

I read the Guardian and I'm extremely middle class. .

Then you should know that a paedophile is into pre-pubescent kids, which is completely different (in the eyes of the law, too) to being into pubescent and post pubescent teens.

It's a distinction which needs to be made, as it's the difference between being a bit of a predatory weirdo and statutory rape.

Sadly, the media fuelled witch hunts in such cases fail to make the distinction, so a huge proportion of our population don't really understand - which is also why people have been known to stake out paediatrician's houses!

[10 Pence Short]

decadence said:

I read the Guardian and I'm extremely middle class. But I still can't be an apologist for Nonces. Never.

Then you should be educated and aware that in many countries women of 13, 14 or 15 can be considered fair game. It is only relatively recent (in human terms) social conventions in society that tells us it is 'wrong' for adults to consider teenage women as objects of desire.

You should also know that there is a tangible difference between 'nonces' who find pre-pubescent children sexually alluring and those who feel the same way about post- pubescent adolescents.

Maybe if you spent more time reading the Guardian instead of wrapping bricks with it as you attack paedatricians, the world would be a better place?

[decadence]

wow..... couple of guys have some serious st in their closets...
far too defensive about kiddy fiddlers.

Edited by decadence on Thursday 11th October 20:19

[decadence]

10 Pence Short said:

decadence said:

I read the Guardian and I'm extremely middle class. But I still can't be an apologist for Nonces. Never.

Then you should be educated and aware that in many countries women of 13, 14 or 15 can be considered fair game. It is only relatively recent (in human terms) social conventions in society that tells us it is 'wrong' for adults to consider teenage women as objects of desire.

You should also know that there is a tangible difference between 'nonces' who find pre-pubescent children sexually alluring and those who feel the same way about post- pubescent adolescents.

Maybe if you spent more time reading the Guardian instead of wrapping bricks with it as you attack paedatricians, the world would be a better place?

all of that post worries me, but the "13,14,15 year olds" and "fair game" are stand outs... jeez. Savile must be a hero of yours ?

[Manks]

decadence said:

I read the Guardian.

Judging by your grammar, punctuation and ill-informed views you'd probably get a job writing for it.

[bamberwell]

Manks said:

decadence said:

I read the Guardian.

Judging by your grammar, punctuation and ill-informed views you'd probably get a job writing for it.

that deserves a !

[Bitofbully]

decadence said:

wow..... couple of guys have some serious st in their closets...
far too defensive about kiddy fiddlers.

You appear to be a bit hard of thinking. Nobody is defending him, just merely pointing out that you're being a bit of a pitchfork wielding mouth-breather who doesn't appreciate the legal and social differences.

[Roo]

decadence said:

wow..... couple of guys have some serious st in their closets...
far too defensive about kiddy fiddlers.

Edited by decadence on Thursday 11th October 20:19

You're quite aggressive in all your posts on here, especially the motorsport ones.

Do you have anger management issues?.

[Mastodon2]

decadence said:

10 Pence Short said:

decadence said:

I read the Guardian and I'm extremely middle class. But I still can't be an apologist for Nonces. Never.

Then you should be educated and aware that in many countries women of 13, 14 or 15 can be considered fair game. It is only relatively recent (in human terms) social conventions in society that tells us it is 'wrong' for adults to consider teenage women as objects of desire.

You should also know that there is a tangible difference between 'nonces' who find pre-pubescent children sexually alluring and those who feel the same way about post- pubescent adolescents.

Maybe if you spent more time reading the Guardian instead of wrapping bricks with it as you attack paedatricians, the world would be a better place?

all of that post worries me, but the "13,14,15 year olds" and "fair game" are stand outs... jeez. Savile must be a hero of yours ?

Has it come as a shock to you that such young females are considered acceptable sexual partners in some
parts of the world? Not every society abides by the rules and norms that we consider "right" and "wrong". That doesn't make anyone on this forum a paedophile, or a paediatrician for that matter, it just shows that you are ignorant to how the world outside of Europe functions.