Car Exhaust Noise

Author
Discussion

AAGR

918 posts

161 months

Tuesday 20th November 2012
quotequote all
Recent BMW M3s have four exhaust pipe outlets coming out of the rear bumper/moulding. What would the police make of that ?


simoid

19,772 posts

158 months

Tuesday 20th November 2012
quotequote all
AAGR said:
Recent BMW M3s have four exhaust pipe outlets coming out of the rear bumper/moulding. What would the police make of that ?
Probably "that car's going a bit fast."

silly

Stinkfoot

2,243 posts

192 months

Tuesday 20th November 2012
quotequote all
Got a pull just after I had a full Evolve system with headers fitted to the M5. The copper just wanted to see if the exhaust had only one box on it "like the Skylines".
When he saw that the car still had 6 boxes on it he was happy. He then said that it sounded fantastic and we had a good car chat for 10 mins or so. I think a good attitude is half the battle to be honest when it comes to speaking with the bib.

The offending exhaust.

Marcellus

7,120 posts

219 months

Tuesday 20th November 2012
quotequote all
Stinkfoot said:
Got a pull just after I had a full Evolve system with headers fitted to the M5. The copper just wanted to see if the exhaust had only one box on it "like the Skylines".
When he saw that the car still had 6 boxes on it he was happy. He then said that it sounded fantastic and we had a good car chat for 10 mins or so. I think a good attitude is half the battle to be honest when it comes to speaking with the bib.
six boxes? I know I've got four how have BM squeezed in 6 and what's the advantage?

Stinkfoot

2,243 posts

192 months

Tuesday 20th November 2012
quotequote all
Marcellus said:
six boxes? I know I've got four how have BM squeezed in 6 and what's the advantage?
Best way to describe it although with the cats you could say its 8 boxes !

http://bmwfans.info/parts/catalog/E39/Sedan/Europe...

TinyCappo

2,106 posts

153 months

Tuesday 20th November 2012
quotequote all
Marcellus said:
Stinkfoot said:
Got a pull just after I had a full Evolve system with headers fitted to the M5. The copper just wanted to see if the exhaust had only one box on it "like the Skylines".
When he saw that the car still had 6 boxes on it he was happy. He then said that it sounded fantastic and we had a good car chat for 10 mins or so. I think a good attitude is half the battle to be honest when it comes to speaking with the bib.
six boxes? I know I've got four how have BM squeezed in 6 and what's the advantage?
backpressure. pretty much all BMWs are really finely tuned on backpressure probably needs 6 to keep it sweet/not flat.

rlw

3,335 posts

237 months

Tuesday 20th November 2012
quotequote all
Could someone please explain to me how this "law" about noise might be applied to a twenties or thirties Bentley with a fking great big engine and no silencer boxes worthy of the name. This whole thing just seems so fking unreal and stupid. My (ex) GT3 easily made 100dB at 4000rpm and went much louder at higher revs but was completely standard.

SarGara

365 posts

176 months

Tuesday 20th November 2012
quotequote all
I assume its more a case of "if you don't pass the attitude test" that it is enforced?

Monkey boy 1

Original Poster:

2,063 posts

231 months

Saturday 12th January 2013
quotequote all
rlw said:
Could someone please explain to me how this "law" about noise might be applied to a twenties or thirties Bentley with a fking great big engine and no silencer boxes worthy of the name. This whole thing just seems so fking unreal and stupid. My (ex) GT3 easily made 100dB at 4000rpm and went much louder at higher revs but was completely standard.
The law was introduces in 1986 and relates to vehicles used on or after 1/10/83. so a 1920's Bentley would be OK.

anyway, After a long wait I have drop on my doorstep a court summons for Feb 2013 about "Using a vehicle with an exhaust system that has been modifies as to increase the noise made by the escape of exhaust gases"

My issue now is that, Yes I know that the exhaust is a modified exhaust and, Yes it is louder than a standard OEM system, but it still does not prove that the system is illegal as the Police check was done incorrectly and not in accordance to ISO5130.



Edited by Monkey boy 1 on Saturday 12th January 19:12

s p a c e m a n

10,779 posts

148 months

Saturday 12th January 2013
quotequote all
Monkey boy 1 said:
anyway, After a long wait I have drop on my doorstep a court summons for Feb 2013 about "Using a vehicle with an exhaust system that has been modifies as to increase the noise made by the escape of exhaust gases"
Where do they have proof of that from, did they inspect your exhaust to show that it is not standard? A db test is hardly proof that you do not have a complete 'e marked' exhaust on your car, or that it differs from standard.

simoid

19,772 posts

158 months

Saturday 12th January 2013
quotequote all
s p a c e m a n said:
Monkey boy 1 said:
anyway, After a long wait I have drop on my doorstep a court summons for Feb 2013 about "Using a vehicle with an exhaust system that has been modifies as to increase the noise made by the escape of exhaust gases"
Where do they have proof of that from, did they inspect your exhaust to show that it is not standard? A db test is hardly proof that you do not have a complete 'e marked' exhaust on your car, or that it differs from standard.
That'll be fun in court.

"Officer, can you identify which of these cars has a standard exhaust?"

* pictures of some exhausts followed by blank looks *

"Thought not, I'll be off now."

liner33

10,691 posts

202 months

Sunday 13th January 2013
quotequote all
Monkey boy 1 said:
The law was introduces in 1986 and relates to vehicles used on or after 1/10/83. so a 1920's Bentley would be OK.

anyway, After a long wait I have drop on my doorstep a court summons for Feb 2013 about "Using a vehicle with an exhaust system that has been modifies as to increase the noise made by the escape of exhaust gases"

My issue now is that, Yes I know that the exhaust is a modified exhaust and, Yes it is louder than a standard OEM system, but it still does not prove that the system is illegal as the Police check was done incorrectly and not in accordance to ISO5130.



Edited by Monkey boy 1 on Saturday 12th January 19:12
How has your exhaust been modified to increase noise??



Monkey boy 1

Original Poster:

2,063 posts

231 months

Sunday 13th January 2013
quotequote all
liner33 said:
How has your exhaust been modified to increase noise??
The exhaust is non standard,twin, twin tail pipes (ie. two each side as with the photo a few posts back), so as far as the BiB are concerned it's modified.

streaky

19,311 posts

249 months

Sunday 13th January 2013
quotequote all
The exhaust system has been modified from that originally fitted. The replacement is not to the same design as the original.

Streaky

simoid

19,772 posts

158 months

Sunday 13th January 2013
quotequote all
streaky said:
The exhaust system has been modified from that originally fitted. The replacement is not to the same design as the original.

Streaky
Modified to be noisier?

s p a c e m a n

10,779 posts

148 months

Sunday 13th January 2013
quotequote all
So what they have done is realised from your correspondence that they have screwed up and can't make the original charge stick and changed it to 'using a modified exhaust' of which they have no actual evidence of, unless they inspected it or took photos?

I do wonder sometimes where the trafpol get such a bad reputation from.

Baron Greenback

6,987 posts

150 months

Sunday 13th January 2013
quotequote all
"Awesome toyota turbo sound

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ieJUP9O9RG8" this must be legal for comedy reason just no near I live please!

Durzel

12,272 posts

168 months

Sunday 13th January 2013
quotequote all
simoid said:
Modified to be noisier?
You're dwelling on semantics I think. Modified in the context of the law doesn't mean that the exhaust has been specifically engineered to make more noise, but that the exhaust system has been modified (from OEM) and also happens to produce increased noise.

My reading of it is that if you fit an aftermarket exhaust that doesn't produce more noise than the factory one you'd be fine (so long as it was E-marked otherwise there's a risk of a C&U offence I think?), but if you fit an aftermarket exhaust that produced more noise than the OEM - which let's face it practically all of them do as a byproduct of being designed to be more free-flowing - then you're bang to rights.

I also think it's one of those offences that is prosecuted in the absence of anything else being wrong. I've had a pretty loud exhaust on my car for years and never been pulled or prosecuted for it, but I do make a point of not blasting around residential/populated places drawing attention to myself.

liner33

10,691 posts

202 months

Sunday 13th January 2013
quotequote all
Durzel said:
You're dwelling on semantics I think. Modified in the context of the law doesn't mean that the exhaust has been specifically engineered to make more noise, but that the exhaust system has been modified (from OEM) and also happens to produce increased noise.

My reading of it is that if you fit an aftermarket exhaust that doesn't produce more noise than the factory one you'd be fine (so long as it was E-marked otherwise there's a risk of a C&U offence I think?), but if you fit an aftermarket exhaust that produced more noise than the OEM - which let's face it practically all of them do as a byproduct of being designed to be more free-flowing - then you're bang to rights.

I also think it's one of those offences that is prosecuted in the absence of anything else being wrong. I've had a pretty loud exhaust on my car for years and never been pulled or prosecuted for it, but I do make a point of not blasting around residential/populated places drawing attention to myself.
Thats not my reading of it , more like the legislation was to address people who deliberately put holes in their exhaust or added things like cherry bombs or the whistles you used to be able to buy

Big difference between that and modifying an engine for more power by fitting an exhaust that makes more noise than stock

Also OEM exhausts are not always available nor are e marked pattern ones and ive yet to see and exhaust that states the DB expected from it.



simoid

19,772 posts

158 months

Sunday 13th January 2013
quotequote all
Durzel said:
simoid said:
Modified to be noisier?
You're dwelling on semantics I think. Modified in the context of the law doesn't mean that the exhaust has been specifically engineered to make more noise, but that the exhaust system has been modified (from OEM) and also happens to produce increased noise.

My reading of it is that if you fit an aftermarket exhaust that doesn't produce more noise than the factory one you'd be fine (so long as it was E-marked otherwise there's a risk of a C&U offence I think?), but if you fit an aftermarket exhaust that produced more noise than the OEM - which let's face it practically all of them do as a byproduct of being designed to be more free-flowing - then you're bang to rights.

I also think it's one of those offences that is prosecuted in the absence of anything else being wrong. I've had a pretty loud exhaust on my car for years and never been pulled or prosecuted for it, but I do make a point of not blasting around residential/populated places drawing attention to myself.
Semantics?

He's being prosecuted for the modified exhaust "as to increase noise".