MLM fines come into place today

MLM fines come into place today

Author
Discussion

Roverload

850 posts

136 months

Sunday 20th April 2014
quotequote all
I can understand how people get wound up by this type of thing but £100 fine, seems like you can get fined for farting whilst driving now, yet another cash generator if you ask me.

jmorgan

36,010 posts

284 months

Sunday 20th April 2014
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Problem is we are used to this mess and bring in a rule that says you can pass either side we are still too many cars on the road. That and I think that as we are used to this system, people will still panic and come in a lane raising the possibility of more accidents.

I usually have a reasonable drive most times of the day except rush hours. That is when average IQ of the road drops to a drunk newt. The standard is appalling, all the wannabe F1 drivers and terminally stupid flood the roads to get to work or flood home. There are a few there in the day time as well but watching this creep up and in a van that is limited to 55, you get to see the stupid happen and it is predictable. You are stuck with drivers that have absolutely no idea. Giving them another rule will not improve it.

jogon

2,971 posts

158 months

Sunday 20th April 2014
quotequote all
The current passing on the right creates a safe haven for all the incompetent drivers in the middle lane. No better way of removing that safe haven by allowing cars to pass you on either side.

I witness it at least once or twice on my journeys and very rarely does it ever create a problem. Only when the MLM tries to prevent the undertake does an issue arise.

Jasandjules

69,892 posts

229 months

Monday 21st April 2014
quotequote all
Roverload said:
I can understand how people get wound up by this type of thing but £100 fine, seems like you can get fined for farting whilst driving now, yet another cash generator if you ask me.
It will certainly generate a lot of cash if they have enough plod out there enforcing it.

And it will actually make driving safer and more pleasant. Win win.

supertouring

2,228 posts

233 months

Monday 21st April 2014
quotequote all
Drove up from Dover on Sat and the M25 now have 4 lanes to play in - but still people sit at 67mph in lane 3 of the four. This leaves two lanes empty.

Why spend all this money increasing the number of lanes when it would be better spent on training the MLMs?

SonicShadow

2,452 posts

154 months

Monday 21st April 2014
quotequote all
supertouring said:
Drove up from Dover on Sat and the M25 now have 4 lanes to play in - but still people sit at 67mph in lane 3 of the four. This leaves two lanes empty.

Why spend all this money increasing the number of lanes when it would be better spent on training the MLMs?
This means you have a whole lane to yourself, with lane 2 as a buffer zone between you and the morons. COuld be worse!

9mm

3,128 posts

210 months

Monday 21st April 2014
quotequote all
SonicShadow said:
supertouring said:
Drove up from Dover on Sat and the M25 now have 4 lanes to play in - but still people sit at 67mph in lane 3 of the four. This leaves two lanes empty.

Why spend all this money increasing the number of lanes when it would be better spent on training the MLMs?
This means you have a whole lane to yourself, with lane 2 as a buffer zone between you and the morons. COuld be worse!
The problem is that if you gain an advantage by travelling in lanes 1 and 2 (assuming 3 and 4 are full of dawdlers doing 67mph or less) then you risk a tug from trafpol.

pingu393

7,798 posts

205 months

Monday 21st April 2014
quotequote all
9mm said:
The problem is that if you gain an advantage by travelling in lanes 1 and 2 (assuming 3 and 4 are full of dawdlers doing 67mph or less) then you risk a tug from trafpol.
My understanding is that it's only an overtake if you changed lanes to do it.

If you have been in lane 1 all the time, no problem.

Potatoes

3,572 posts

170 months

Monday 21st April 2014
quotequote all
You can now get fined for pushing into a queue? Seems ambiguous and I hope this doesn't relate to merging in turn when going from x lanes to x-1 lane(s).

Who me ?

7,455 posts

212 months

Monday 21st April 2014
quotequote all
I can't find the post where some poster said I use this ( some sort of detector/sat nav etc), but perhaps the best detector is the MK1 eyeball and one aspect of what for years was taught to new drivers, and is now appearing on Speed Awareness Courses -C.O.A.S.T.
C = Courtesy ,and most important ,Concentration ( to lookout for multi coloured vans parked in odd places, where a van might not be parked).
O= observation - to lookout for the above mentioned vans.

vonhosen

40,233 posts

217 months

Monday 21st April 2014
quotequote all
pingu393 said:
9mm said:
The problem is that if you gain an advantage by travelling in lanes 1 and 2 (assuming 3 and 4 are full of dawdlers doing 67mph or less) then you risk a tug from trafpol.
My understanding is that it's only an overtake if you changed lanes to do it.

If you have been in lane 1 all the time, no problem.
That's not what the highway code says.

HC said:
268
Do not overtake on the left OR move to a lane on your left to overtake.
My emphasis

vonhosen

40,233 posts

217 months

Monday 21st April 2014
quotequote all
Potatoes said:
You can now get fined for pushing into a queue? Seems ambiguous and I hope this doesn't relate to merging in turn when going from x lanes to x-1 lane(s).
That would depend on the lane markings wouldn't it?

pingu393

7,798 posts

205 months

Monday 21st April 2014
quotequote all
vonhosen said:
pingu393 said:
9mm said:
The problem is that if you gain an advantage by travelling in lanes 1 and 2 (assuming 3 and 4 are full of dawdlers doing 67mph or less) then you risk a tug from trafpol.
My understanding is that it's only an overtake if you changed lanes to do it.

If you have been in lane 1 all the time, no problem.
That's not what the highway code says.

HC said:
268
Do not overtake on the left OR move to a lane on your left to overtake.
My emphasis
IIRC, someone quoted the "Driving Bible" (can't remember it's name) and it stated that an overtake involves a lane change?

mcdjl

5,446 posts

195 months

Tuesday 22nd April 2014
quotequote all
9mm said:
The problem is that if you gain an advantage by travelling in lanes 1 and 2 (assuming 3 and 4 are full of dawdlers doing 67mph or less) then you risk a tug from trafpol.
I moved from lane 1 to lane 2 to overtake a police car and the car behind it doing ~65mph. When it pulled into L2 and cut me up followed by putting its lights on, the fact that I'd undertaken a few cars in L2/3/4 (I'd sat in L1 since joinging the motorway several junctions earlier) all also doing ~65mph did cause me to think about a change of undwerwear. Fortunately (for me) he continued into L4 and the distance smile. A few minutes later I did see him again, on the hard shoulder along with two estates he'd gone to chat to.

karona

1,918 posts

186 months

Seesure

1,187 posts

239 months

Sunday 21st June 2015
quotequote all
karona said:
It needs to be a frequent occurrence rather than a rare one....

The sheer volume of these idiots is truly astounding, but it will never get better without policing.

It's not helped by the media often referring to the different lanes as either the "slow " or "fast " lane....

divetheworld

2,565 posts

135 months

Sunday 21st June 2015
quotequote all
karona said:
The article intimates that this is the first prosecution, is that true?

BertBert

19,039 posts

211 months

Sunday 21st June 2015
quotequote all
divetheworld said:
karona said:
The article intimates that this is the first prosecution, is that true?
Er "theladbible"? That'll be a reliable source then. rolleyes

PanzerCommander

5,026 posts

218 months

Sunday 21st June 2015
quotequote all
"few things are worse than being stuck behind a middle lane hogger", erm just move into the outside lane and pass them. Its not difficult.

Impasse

15,099 posts

241 months

Sunday 21st June 2015
quotequote all
BertBert said:
Er "theladbible"? That'll be a reliable source then. rolleyes
It's elsewhere on t'web, too. http://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/motorist-beco...


Still, one prosecution every two years. I can see how this will be huge deterrent.