Weird royal mail scam? gissa clu!

Weird royal mail scam? gissa clu!

Author
Discussion

rix

Original Poster:

2,791 posts

191 months

Wednesday 30th October 2013
quotequote all
Mrs Rix get a card to pick up a 'special delivery' item from the local sorting office. Duly goes to collect it, signs for it and takes it home. Its addressed to a dormant business name of hers which has only had very limited marketing (its on Yell etc), and is not a limited company. A bit weird in itself but she does get the occasional bit of marketing/cold calling from the internet listings.

This special delivery cost the sender over £6, was a 'do not bend' A5 envelope, but contained one folder A4 sheet which was a random zoopla print (apparently page 6 of 7!) of equally random property for sale in Leicester! (We're in Essex and havent been in the property market for years!). Its incredibly odd and stinks of something iffy, I just cannot work out what. The only thing that did cross my mind is that they now have my wife's signature from royal mail. Still this seems to be an expensive way of doing so (could've done 'signed for' service much cheaper), and why put anything in an envelope at all!

Any ideas?

Upatdawn

2,184 posts

149 months

Wednesday 30th October 2013
quotequote all
someone wants to know where you/she is....

briang9

3,329 posts

161 months

Wednesday 30th October 2013
quotequote all
I would expect Liam Neeson to turn up real soonbiggrin

stevensdrs

3,213 posts

201 months

Wednesday 30th October 2013
quotequote all
Upatdawn said:
someone wants to know where you/she is....
^^ This.

Expect the bailiffs soon.

streaky

19,311 posts

250 months

Thursday 31st October 2013
quotequote all
Consider Hanlon's Razor.

Streaky

vladcjelli

2,985 posts

159 months

Thursday 31st October 2013
quotequote all
rix said:
they now have my wife's signature from royal mail.
If you check the tracking number on the Royal Mail website, you'll probably see there is no way the quality of reproduction could be used for any nefarious purpose.

Most likely it was a test to see if anyone would collect the item. If not, they could then go ahead and use it as an anonymous collection service where they can order things to be delivered, which they obviously won't be, and just pick them up from the delivery office.

Fozziebear

1,840 posts

141 months

Thursday 31st October 2013
quotequote all
stevensdrs said:
Upatdawn said:
someone wants to know where you/she is....
^^ This.

Expect the bailiffs soon.
Nope, bailiffs would spend that amount of money or time. It's similar to spoof delivery that insurance fraud companies used to use, knock door and get the claimant to sign for an envelope, confirms person at address

Mr GrimNasty

8,172 posts

171 months

Thursday 31st October 2013
quotequote all
streaky said:
Consider Hanlon's Razor.

Streaky
Why do people keep posting this expression and its variants on here - it is just so repetitive and tedious.

EskimoArapaho

5,135 posts

136 months

Thursday 31st October 2013
quotequote all
vladcjelli said:
Most likely it was a test to see if anyone would collect the item. If not, they could then go ahead and use it as an anonymous collection service where they can order things to be delivered, which they obviously won't be, and just pick them up from the delivery office.
But teh scammer can't collect the package without Postie's "Sorry you were out" card, which the scammer would not have as they don't have access to the OP's doormat.

rix

Original Poster:

2,791 posts

191 months

Thursday 31st October 2013
quotequote all
Mr GrimNasty said:
Why do people keep posting this expression and its variants on here - it is just so repetitive and tedious.
Actually, I'd never heard it, and now I have, I quite like the sentiment!

Rude-boy

22,227 posts

234 months

Thursday 31st October 2013
quotequote all
rix said:
Actually, I'd never heard it, and now I have, I quite like the sentiment!
Trust me, after the 763 reading it loses its appeal, bit like the one about all arguments will end up referencing WWII if left to go on for long enough.

Mandat

3,901 posts

239 months

Thursday 31st October 2013
quotequote all
Rude-boy said:
Trust me, after the 763 reading it loses its appeal, bit like the one about all arguments will end up referencing WWII if left to go on for long enough.
That's Godwins Law, and it's true, since you mentioned WWII.

carinaman

21,370 posts

173 months

Thursday 31st October 2013
quotequote all
Both of those laws passed me by.

Martin4x4

6,506 posts

133 months

Thursday 31st October 2013
quotequote all
Has she bought anything from ebay recently?

One ebay scam is to send worthless crap like this by special delivery to prove they've been dispatched and most importantly 'signed for'.

northwest monkey

6,370 posts

190 months

Friday 1st November 2013
quotequote all
Martin4x4 said:
Has she bought anything from ebay recently?

One ebay scam is to send worthless crap like this by special delivery to prove they've been dispatched and most importantly 'signed for'.
Doesn't actually work as the weight of the item is scanned & recorded at the Post Office. If someone actually fell for this scam they're as daft as the scammer believing it will work.

streaky

19,311 posts

250 months

Friday 1st November 2013
quotequote all
Mr GrimNasty said:
streaky said:
Consider Hanlon's Razor.

Streaky
Why do people keep posting this expression and its variants on here - it is just so repetitive and tedious.
Maybe because it applies to threads such as this.

Streaky

joewilliams

2,004 posts

202 months

Friday 1st November 2013
quotequote all
northwest monkey said:
Martin4x4 said:
Has she bought anything from ebay recently?

One ebay scam is to send worthless crap like this by special delivery to prove they've been dispatched and most importantly 'signed for'.
Doesn't actually work as the weight of the item is scanned & recorded at the Post Office. If someone actually fell for this scam they're as daft as the scammer believing it will work.
Not necessarily. Stuff sent from our franking machine doesn't have a record of weight, and it's hardly tricky to add bulk to something to make it approximately the correct weight.

Chiswickboy

549 posts

189 months

Friday 1st November 2013
quotequote all
northwest monkey said:
Martin4x4 said:
Has she bought anything from ebay recently?

One ebay scam is to send worthless crap like this by special delivery to prove they've been dispatched and most importantly 'signed for'.
Doesn't actually work as the weight of the item is scanned & recorded at the Post Office. If someone actually fell for this scam they're as daft as the scammer believing it will work.
In my experience ebay will not give a toss about the detail (of weight in this case) and will side with seller as they have proof of delivery.

58warren

589 posts

180 months

Friday 1st November 2013
quotequote all
rix said:
Mrs Rix get a card to pick up a 'special delivery' item from the local sorting office. Duly goes to collect it, signs for it and takes it home. Its addressed to a dormant business name of hers which has only had very limited marketing (its on Yell etc), and is not a limited company. A bit weird in itself but she does get the occasional bit of marketing/cold calling from the internet listings.

This special delivery cost the sender over £6, was a 'do not bend' A5 envelope, but contained one folder A4 sheet which was a random zoopla print (apparently page 6 of 7!) of equally random property for sale in Leicester! (We're in Essex and havent been in the property market for years!). Its incredibly odd and stinks of something iffy, I just cannot work out what. The only thing that did cross my mind is that they now have my wife's signature from royal mail. Still this seems to be an expensive way of doing so (could've done 'signed for' service much cheaper), and why put anything in an envelope at all!

Any ideas?
Well at least you know the address of the house in Leicester to visit if you come back home and your wife's not there any more...

thismonkeyhere

10,463 posts

232 months

Friday 1st November 2013
quotequote all
Mandat said:
Rude-boy said:
Trust me, after the 763 reading it loses its appeal, bit like the one about all arguments will end up referencing WWII if left to go on for long enough.
That's Godwins Law, and it's true, since you mentioned WWII.
Godwin's Law references Hitler / Nazis.

I've not heard of one specifically for WW2.