arrested for DD last night, refused to give sample

[matchmaker]

Meoricin said:

I swear, all debates in SP&L can be split into the following groups:

Lawyers/Law students who know how the law is supposed to work (or think they do, in the case of some).

Police officers who know how it worksthey work it in practice, in their particular restricted area of knowledge.

Confused but well meaning people, asking the wrong questions and listening to the wrong people.

Absolute morons spouting gibberish which stems from 'free man on the land' wibble.

"Victims" who believe all forms of authority are corrupt and out to get them, and use this as justification to misbehave and complete the circle.

EFA

[anonymous-user]

Now there's a 'tell it like it is take no non-sense guy'

[NH1]

So I take it if you've had a couple and make it home then you would do well not to answer the door for the rest of the evening then.

[anonymous-user]

If you want the risk of losing your front door.

Perhaps don't go back to the address your vehicle is registered to

[Steffan]

NH1 said:

So I take it if you've had a couple and make it home then you would do well not to answer the door for the rest of the evening then.

Without wishing to be sanctimonious I personally think DD has long gone from the being in "How can I get away with this" approach. Better surely to never drink and drive than drink and drive knowingly with all the attendant risks for other road users, that such madness entails and the probable consequences to life, limb and property by kidding yourself that you can avoid detection. I cannot see that as rational or reasonable just downright criminal.