HADECS 3 cameras on the M25

HADECS 3 cameras on the M25

Author
Discussion

mygoldfishbowl

3,701 posts

143 months

Wednesday 20th July 2016
quotequote all
tapereel said:
Why not just go to a police source for the information?

It has the potential to cut out the guff.
Because,

Like you they are liars,

The M5 & M4 have got nothing to do with the M25 which this thread is about, but even if they had those cameras don't enforce the NSL either, they also enforce a higher speed.

jonnygti

1 posts

118 months

Monday 1st August 2016
quotequote all
CoolHands said:
I went past one at approx 120-130 and still accelerating. Didn't get a ticket. Make of that what you will.
Did it flash you?

CoolHands

18,633 posts

195 months

Monday 1st August 2016
quotequote all
Not that I noticed. I noticed the box hanging off the gantry on the side as I whizzed through it too late to abort. It was a while ago so maybe before they went live, I don't know.

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

255 months

Tuesday 2nd August 2016
quotequote all
jonnygti said:
CoolHands said:
I went past one at approx 120-130 and still accelerating. Didn't get a ticket. Make of that what you will.
Did it flash you?
They seem to be switching them on and off at random in my neck of the woods for NSL enforcement. One was flashing like a Christmas tree for a week, then nothing for several weeks.

smack

9,729 posts

191 months

Wednesday 3rd August 2016
quotequote all
Overnight (well the platform in preparation for the install has been there for months) a new camera has been installed between J18-19 Clockwise.

BristolRich

545 posts

133 months

Wednesday 3rd August 2016
quotequote all
CoolHands said:
Not that I noticed. I noticed the box hanging off the gantry on the side as I whizzed through it too late to abort.
Keep an eye out for the ~15ft high "T" shaped pole with as many cameras as lanes mounted across its top. Thats your warning sign that the next gantry has HADECS mounted on it.

speedking31

3,556 posts

136 months

Wednesday 3rd August 2016
quotequote all
In this view, those are SPECS cameras for the duration of the 'upgrade' to managed motorway. They will disappear then to leave the HADECS flashing away.

speedking31

3,556 posts

136 months

Wednesday 3rd August 2016
quotequote all
The next step will be Google forced to blur out all motorway gantries on Google Street to prevent people from easily discovering and sharing camera locations.

speedking31

3,556 posts

136 months

Wednesday 3rd August 2016
quotequote all
speedking31 said:
Yes they were in the managed motorway section coming north out of Birmingham on the M6. However, the cameras were mounted on a bracket on an umbrella handle massive pole supporting a single square-ish message board, not a gantry spanning the carriageway.

In the dark these will be impossible to see, and could be a game changer wrt my approach to driving on the motorway.
Found something similar.

jurbie

2,343 posts

201 months

Wednesday 3rd August 2016
quotequote all
speedking31 said:
One thing that is puzzling me about that stretch is it's recently been upgraded to managed motorway but there is only one gantry along the whole stretch with the variable limit signs and cameras mounted over all the lanes. However there are several of the large roadside matrix signs as per the link which will also display the variable speed limit and all have HADECS on them so are they also enforcing the variable limit or not?

I was on that stretch yesterday when it was supposed to be down to 40mph and everyone was ignoring it but I didn't notice the cameras flashing. It strikes me that most people associate a variable limit with gantry mounted signs and cameras whilst the lone sign at the road side is ignored like it's just a regular matrix sign displaying an advisory limit but if it starts enforcing the variable limit with no prior warning then a lot of people are going to get some nasty surprises, what would being nicked for doing 70 in a 40 variable limit get you?


anonymous-user

54 months

Thursday 4th August 2016
quotequote all
jurbie said:
speedking31 said:
One thing that is puzzling me about that stretch is it's recently been upgraded to managed motorway but there is only one gantry along the whole stretch with the variable limit signs and cameras mounted over all the lanes. However there are several of the large roadside matrix signs as per the link which will also display the variable speed limit and all have HADECS on them so are they also enforcing the variable limit or not?
Fill your boots https://www.gov.uk/guidance/how-to-drive-on-a-smar...
From what I can remember MM2 (now all smart) to keep costs down ? Superspan gantries will be used less frequently, along with emergency refuge areas etc. There will always be one (or should be) after a junction so joining traffic passes an 'enforceable' limit followed by the "hockey stick" vms (think inverted hockey stick wobble) properly known as an MS4 (Google MS4 gantry smile for ideas http://www.nusteelstructures.com/gantries/ms4/ )
Can't quite remember what the small "irrelevant" sign in front of the MS4 was apart from some very heated meetings
With issues around it's size, positioning and legality smile

va1o

16,032 posts

207 months

Thursday 4th August 2016
quotequote all
smack said:
Overnight (well the platform in preparation for the install has been there for months) a new camera has been installed between J18-19 Clockwise.
noticed these today, bit confused as they already have gantry cameras next to where it has been mounted, surely don't need two sets of cameras in one place? confused

jurbie

2,343 posts

201 months

Thursday 4th August 2016
quotequote all
speedyguy said:
Fill your boots https://www.gov.uk/guidance/how-to-drive-on-a-smar...
From what I can remember MM2 (now all smart) to keep costs down ? Superspan gantries will be used less frequently, along with emergency refuge areas etc. There will always be one (or should be) after a junction so joining traffic passes an 'enforceable' limit followed by the "hockey stick" vms (think inverted hockey stick wobble) properly known as an MS4 (Google MS4 gantry smile for ideas http://www.nusteelstructures.com/gantries/ms4/ )
Can't quite remember what the small "irrelevant" sign in front of the MS4 was apart from some very heated meetings
With issues around it's size, positioning and legality smile
Interesting, so the verge mounted signs are being used because they are cheaper and the HADECS will monitor all lanes when an enforceable limit is being shown and sooner or later the cameras will become live and will nick thousands. Meanwhile I'm at the limit whilst everyone else sails past 30 or 40 mph faster.

I feel the highways agency perhaps needs to advertise what it plans to do because I can see either a major pile up caused by such a wide gap in speeds or a huge backlog in court when so many find themselves nicked at or approaching double the limit.

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

255 months

Thursday 4th August 2016
quotequote all
va1o said:
smack said:
Overnight (well the platform in preparation for the install has been there for months) a new camera has been installed between J18-19 Clockwise.
noticed these today, bit confused as they already have gantry cameras next to where it has been mounted, surely don't need two sets of cameras in one place? confused
There are a considerable number of similar circumstances all the way up the M1.

What would they do if they removed the old ones, sell them to Zimbabwe?

Terminator X

15,080 posts

204 months

Friday 5th August 2016
quotequote all
jurbie said:
speedyguy said:
Fill your boots https://www.gov.uk/guidance/how-to-drive-on-a-smar...
From what I can remember MM2 (now all smart) to keep costs down ? Superspan gantries will be used less frequently, along with emergency refuge areas etc. There will always be one (or should be) after a junction so joining traffic passes an 'enforceable' limit followed by the "hockey stick" vms (think inverted hockey stick wobble) properly known as an MS4 (Google MS4 gantry smile for ideas http://www.nusteelstructures.com/gantries/ms4/ )
Can't quite remember what the small "irrelevant" sign in front of the MS4 was apart from some very heated meetings
With issues around it's size, positioning and legality smile
Interesting, so the verge mounted signs are being used because they are cheaper and the HADECS will monitor all lanes when an enforceable limit is being shown and sooner or later the cameras will become live and will nick thousands. Meanwhile I'm at the limit whilst everyone else sails past 30 or 40 mph faster.

I feel the highways agency perhaps needs to advertise what it plans to do because I can see either a major pile up caused by such a wide gap in speeds or a huge backlog in court when so many find themselves nicked at or approaching double the limit.
Peeps don't drive at 140mph, come on now! 70-90 must be the average so it won't go to court will it, robots issue tickets and people pay up. Simples.

TX.

colin_p

4,503 posts

212 months

Friday 5th August 2016
quotequote all
Terminator X said:
jurbie said:
speedyguy said:
Fill your boots https://www.gov.uk/guidance/how-to-drive-on-a-smar...
From what I can remember MM2 (now all smart) to keep costs down ? Superspan gantries will be used less frequently, along with emergency refuge areas etc. There will always be one (or should be) after a junction so joining traffic passes an 'enforceable' limit followed by the "hockey stick" vms (think inverted hockey stick wobble) properly known as an MS4 (Google MS4 gantry smile for ideas http://www.nusteelstructures.com/gantries/ms4/ )
Can't quite remember what the small "irrelevant" sign in front of the MS4 was apart from some very heated meetings
With issues around it's size, positioning and legality smile
Interesting, so the verge mounted signs are being used because they are cheaper and the HADECS will monitor all lanes when an enforceable limit is being shown and sooner or later the cameras will become live and will nick thousands. Meanwhile I'm at the limit whilst everyone else sails past 30 or 40 mph faster.

I feel the highways agency perhaps needs to advertise what it plans to do because I can see either a major pile up caused by such a wide gap in speeds or a huge backlog in court when so many find themselves nicked at or approaching double the limit.
Peeps don't drive at 140mph, come on now! 70-90 must be the average so it won't go to court will it, robots issue tickets and people pay up. Simples.

TX.
Many will be doing double the limit or close to it when one of those pointless 40 limits pops up for no apparent reason at all.

Saying that, I'm sure I've read that the limit will taper down over miles and miles and miles so it won't go straight from 70 to 40.



anonymous-user

54 months

Friday 5th August 2016
quotequote all
colin_p said:
Many will be doing double the limit or close to it when one of those pointless 40 limits pops up for no apparent reason at all.
Saying that, I'm sure I've read that the limit will taper down over miles and miles and miles so it won't go straight from 70 to 40.
And RCC bod can answer that, as far as I'm aware speeds will never drop below 20mph increments i'e 70-50 or 70-60-40, if in a 50mph roadworks area they may drop straight to 30 if the signals are still operative, as mentioned RCC opo's will know more.
Also the implementation of laser speed measurement going forward will allow the removal of midas loops every 250M across the network and the associated roadworks disruption and costs similar to the concrete barriers, no need to keep closing lanes etc to replace after a small ding.

V8 Fettler

7,019 posts

132 months

Friday 5th August 2016
quotequote all
70-50 can be problematic when dropping anchor in lane 4 with tailgaters behind, it's safer to speed a little bit and hope for the best.

speedking31

3,556 posts

136 months

Friday 5th August 2016
quotequote all
Automated law enforcement takes no account of safety, you would have to have your day in court.

va1o

16,032 posts

207 months

Friday 5th August 2016
quotequote all
mybrainhurts said:
va1o said:
smack said:
Overnight (well the platform in preparation for the install has been there for months) a new camera has been installed between J18-19 Clockwise.
noticed these today, bit confused as they already have gantry cameras next to where it has been mounted, surely don't need two sets of cameras in one place? confused
There are a considerable number of similar circumstances all the way up the M1.

What would they do if they removed the old ones, sell them to Zimbabwe?
Are the old ones broken? Would make more sense to put the HADECs cameras on gantries that don't already have cameras...

The way they've done it looks like a pointless exercise and waste of money