Review of Duggan inquest

Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

54 months

Monday 14th July 2014
quotequote all
Mandown46 said:
La Liga - some excellent responses, frankly, my patience would have worn thin a long time ago.
Thanks. Dealing with idiots frequently has evidentially raised my threshold over the years.

There's understandably a lot of misunderstanding about policing and this forum is a great place for people to get some insight they wouldn't usually get. It amazes me the level of stupidity and ignorance the OP and others display and continue to when they are presented with facts. I can't emphasise enough how much thought and care goes into firearms deployments. No police officer wants to discharge their weapon and everything is geared towards that outcome, which is why it's achieved nearly all the time.



pork911

7,158 posts

183 months

Monday 14th July 2014
quotequote all
La Liga said:
hanks. Dealing with idiots frequently has evidentially raised my threshold over the years.

There's understandably a lot of misunderstanding about policing and this forum is a great place for people to get some insight they wouldn't usually get. It amazes me the level of stupidity and ignorance the OP and others display and continue to when they are presented with facts. I can't emphasise enough how much thought and care goes into firearms deployments. No police officer wants to discharge their weapon and everything is geared towards that outcome, which is why it's achieved nearly all the time.


The officer who shot duggan gave evidence that he saw him holding a gun before each of the two times he shot him.

Will the care you talk of mean that officer is no longer involved with firearms?



anonymous-user

54 months

Tuesday 15th July 2014
quotequote all
pork911 said:
The officer who shot duggan gave evidence that he saw him holding a gun before each of the two times he shot him.

Will the care you talk of mean that officer is no longer involved with firearms?
We're flawed when it comes to perception, memory and bias. There's much work in cognitive science around how the brain processes and stores information and how it can be different, and in some cases dramatically different, from what actually occurred. Any one who has taken multiple statements from people all seeing the same thing will see this in action. It's especially pertinent when there's CCTV as a anchor and reference point.

If the officer's account vs what occurred was in line with normal and reasonable cognitive flaws, then how could it be a rational decision to remove him?

If it were found the individual significantly deviated from the norm in terms of what could reasonably occur within most people, then there'd be a case to remove him. I've not seen any evidence this is the case, though.




wc98

10,401 posts

140 months

Friday 18th July 2014
quotequote all
La Liga said:
hanks. Dealing with idiots frequently has evidentially raised my threshold over the years.

There's understandably a lot of misunderstanding about policing and this forum is a great place for people to get some insight they wouldn't usually get. It amazes me the level of stupidity and ignorance the OP and others display and continue to when they are presented with facts. I can't emphasise enough how much thought and care goes into firearms deployments. No police officer wants to discharge their weapon and everything is geared towards that outcome, which is why it's achieved nearly all the time.


you did a great job of dealing with the accused ,my patience would not have lasted past his first post looking at the quotes. i completely understand the need for armed police , appreciate the level of training and care that goes into operational planning ,but after the bloke carrying the table leg and de menezes ,the thought of being anywhere near an armed police officer in an operational situation fills me with terror.

anonymous-user

54 months

Tuesday 14th October 2014
quotequote all
The High Court has upheld the 'lawful killing' verdict: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-29611987

pork911

7,158 posts

183 months

Tuesday 14th October 2014
quotequote all
Grist to PH mill.

Anyhow, is the killer (who says he saw the gun in duggan's hands before each shot) back on duty and carrying a firearm?


Corpulent Tosser

5,459 posts

245 months

Wednesday 15th October 2014
quotequote all
pork911 said:
Grist to PH mill.

Anyhow, is the killer (who says he saw the gun in duggan's hands before each shot) back on duty and carrying a firearm?
I certainly hope he is back on duty and have no problem if he is still on a firearms team or whatever they call it..

pork911

7,158 posts

183 months

Wednesday 15th October 2014
quotequote all
Corpulent Tosser said:
pork911 said:
Grist to PH mill.

Anyhow, is the killer (who says he saw the gun in duggan's hands before each shot) back on duty and carrying a firearm?
I certainly hope he is back on duty and have no problem if he is still on a firearms team or whatever they call it..
Let's hope you are never confronted by him while not holding a gun.

Corpulent Tosser

5,459 posts

245 months

Wednesday 15th October 2014
quotequote all
pork911 said:
Corpulent Tosser said:
pork911 said:
Grist to PH mill.

Anyhow, is the killer (who says he saw the gun in duggan's hands before each shot) back on duty and carrying a firearm?
I certainly hope he is back on duty and have no problem if he is still on a firearms team or whatever they call it..
Let's hope you are never confronted by him while not holding a gun.
What utter bks !
I am not involved in crime, gun or otherwise, so I have nothing to concern myself about.

The chances of this man shooting anyone else in his career is virtually nil, but if he shoots another scrote who is involved in gun crime then more power to his trigger finger.

Pip1968

1,348 posts

204 months

Wednesday 15th October 2014
quotequote all
pork911 said:
Let's hope you are never confronted by him while not holding a gun.
Pork911, I think that you are confusing CorpulentT- with a little scumbag who was involved in gun crime. I think and hope that CorpulentT- is not even close in profile to Duggan.

Armed police have to make split second decisions in life threatening situations. It is not an enviable task. It is a tough job but unfortunately somebody has to do it. Perhaps if there was still national service and you were filtered through Afghanistan/Iraq everyone would have a better understanding.

It is very easy for 'desk jockeys' to criticise but still expect the protection of their human rights, family and home.

Pip

pork911

7,158 posts

183 months

Wednesday 15th October 2014
quotequote all
Sounds akin to supporting judicial killings of those that fit the profile then, which I doubt the officer would support.

But Nevermind my views clearly demonstrate I am but a desk jockey with no experience in such matters wink

pork911

7,158 posts

183 months

Wednesday 15th October 2014
quotequote all
Neither of you are a Brazilian plasterer? Or have a 'dusky hue'? Profile and all that wink

Greendubber

13,216 posts

203 months

Wednesday 15th October 2014
quotequote all
Yawn

Corpulent Tosser

5,459 posts

245 months

Wednesday 15th October 2014
quotequote all
pork911 said:
Sounds akin to supporting judicial killings of those that fit the profile then, which I doubt the officer would support.

But Nevermind my views clearly demonstrate I am but a desk jockey with no experience in such matters wink
If you get yourself into a situation of your own making which puts you in peril just whose fault do you think it is ?

If Duggan had not been involved in crime would the situation have occurred ?

Just try thinking about personal responsibility !

pork911

7,158 posts

183 months

Wednesday 15th October 2014
quotequote all
Corpulent Tosser said:
If you get yourself into a situation of your own making which puts you in peril just whose fault do you think it is ?

If Duggan had not been involved in crime would the situation have occurred ?

Just try thinking about personal responsibility !
Putting aside Brazilian plasterers wink are you really advocating death to all criminal suspects?


Corpulent Tosser

5,459 posts

245 months

Wednesday 15th October 2014
quotequote all
pork911 said:
Corpulent Tosser said:
If you get yourself into a situation of your own making which puts you in peril just whose fault do you think it is ?

If Duggan had not been involved in crime would the situation have occurred ?

Just try thinking about personal responsibility !
Putting aside Brazilian plasterers wink are you really advocating death to all criminal suspects?
What in my posts would give you cause to ask that question ?


Greendubber

13,216 posts

203 months

Wednesday 15th October 2014
quotequote all
pork911 said:
Putting aside Brazilian plasterers wink are you really advocating death to all criminal suspects?
Missed the point entirely

pork911

7,158 posts

183 months

Wednesday 15th October 2014
quotequote all
Greendubber said:
Missed the point entirely
Yes you did wink

Corpulent Tosser

5,459 posts

245 months

Wednesday 15th October 2014
quotequote all
Tell you what pork911 if you answer the two questions I asked you I will gladly answer your's.

Greendubber

13,216 posts

203 months

Wednesday 15th October 2014
quotequote all
pork911 said:
Yes you did wink
Nope not at all. You're missing the point to back up your own opinion so you can continue he to ram it down everyone's throats.