A question for solicitors regarding confidentiality
Discussion
IanA2 said:
Breadvan72 said:
There is no legal constraint on discussing the case. You need not name names but there is nothing to preclude you giving details. What is the point of this thread? You presumably have professional advice. You won't improve on that here without providing some facts. If you are looking for validation of your views, that's worthless unless based on the facts.
There is currently no professional input. I am not looking for validation of my views which you as you correctly point out would be worthless unless based on facts. That said, some of your observations, based on the facts I have, have been useful, and I feel more able to discuss the matter with the SRA; for that my thanks.
I did in fact pm you, I think about a year ago, giving you detailed information as I was seeking help with recommendations regarding the Bar Pro Bono Unit.
The whole story, if/when it surfaces is a curly story of abuse with multiple story lines and pantomimic characters. If/when I can, I will reveal all.
Breadvan72 said:
I suggest that you obtain advice, because it sounds like you risk burying your case underneath your fixation with the other side's lawyers.
Hm. I think not, this is very much a side matter which interests me because of the ethical dissonances vibrating throughout the whole saga. I'm curious by nature, but clear in intent.Did you read my PM. You'll see I didn't mention this, however I do think it's an interesting avenue that might be explored at the appropriate time.
Currently my discussions with the SRA are merely preliminary and not directly relevant to any action/negotiations in regard to the case.
It may be that we have secured a barrister, just need to sort out finance.
tbarrister At times hilarious.
The babysitting one is ace.Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff