Scottish Drink Drving Chages
Discussion
Phatboy317 said:
All this talk about a Federal United Kingdom.
What would the acronym for that be, I wonder?
We've actually got a 'federal' UK.All the 'talk' is those like the federalists in the Libdem Party etc trying to dress up a Federation as a Confederation in the form of pretend devolution to appease the nationalist and throw them off course.When examples such as this prove that it is a federation. What would the acronym for that be, I wonder?
XJ Flyer said:
It is a federation of different nations.
England hasn't been a single separate country since 1283, and was only a single country for about 300 years before that - half of which it was under French rule.Wales has never been a single separate country.
Scotland hasn't been a single separate country since 1707, despite Alex's best efforts earlier this year.
Northern Ireland has never been a single separate country.
The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland is the only thing which can be meaningfully viewed as a country in any sensible way whatsoever. And, if you don't believe me, look on the front of your flippin' passport and driving licence...
If you view the UK as a "federation", surely England is also a "federation", of Mercia, Wessex, etc etc?
TooMany2cvs said:
XJ Flyer said:
It is a federation of different nations.
England hasn't been a single separate country since 1283, and was only a single country for about 300 years before that - half of which it was under French rule.Wales has never been a single separate country.
Scotland hasn't been a single separate country since 1707, despite Alex's best efforts earlier this year.
Northern Ireland has never been a single separate country.
The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland is the only thing which can be meaningfully viewed as a country in any sensible way whatsoever. And, if you don't believe me, look on the front of your flippin' passport and driving licence...
If you view the UK as a "federation", surely England is also a "federation", of Mercia, Wessex, etc etc?
As for England that was a 'Confederation' of Wessex,Mercia etc.IE the component parts retained individual sovereignty and precedence over all decisions and administration of the group as a whole.At least until the Athalstan turned England into a federation by way of unification of government against the wishes of Wessex.In which case had England survived in that earlier form there would have been no reason as to why an offence committed against local Mercian,let alone Scottish,traffic laws would have automatically meant a licence penalty in Wessex on a Wessex issued licence for example.
Edited by XJ Flyer on Saturday 6th December 17:12
Edited by XJ Flyer on Saturday 6th December 17:15
Edited by XJ Flyer on Saturday 6th December 17:22
Phatboy317 said:
A driving ban is tantamount to a prison sentence for a great many people - except perhaps the rich who don't need to work and pay mortgages etc.
Is it right to be imprisoned in your home country for breaking some law in another country, when it would not have been against the law at home?
Losing your licence akin to prison.....are you on drugs?Is it right to be imprisoned in your home country for breaking some law in another country, when it would not have been against the law at home?
I'm not sure you're aware, but not being able to drive still allows you to walk, ride a pushbike, take the bus, train, taxi, or get a lift from someone else.
Edited by TwigtheWonderkid on Saturday 6th December 17:40
TwigtheWonderkid said:
Losing your licence akin to prison.....are you on drugs?
I'm not sure you're aware, but not being able to drive still allows you to walk, ride a pushbike, take the bus, train, taxi, or get a lift from someone else.
You evidently didn't notice the "for a great many people" bit.I'm not sure you're aware, but not being able to drive still allows you to walk, ride a pushbike, take the bus, train, taxi, or get a lift from someone else.
Edited by TwigtheWonderkid on Saturday 6th December 17:40
While we're on the subject of dodgy comparisons though, your earlier one about doing 60mph in a 20, as opposed to on a motorway, takes some beating.
XJ Flyer said:
No,as it stands,you won't get penalties on a UK issued licence for an offence committed locally in another EU country.
.Indeed. However, this IS NOT another EU state. You have a UK license, you are breaking a UK law. Your point would apply if you had an English driving license, but you don't, so it isn't.
GreigM said:
XJ Flyer said:
No,as it stands,you won't get penalties on a UK issued licence for an offence committed locally in another EU country.
.Indeed. However, this IS NOT another EU state. You have a UK license, you are breaking a UK law. Your point would apply if you had an English driving license, but you don't, so it isn't.
Hopefully all the above issues are what at least might stop the EU federalists getting their way in regard to an EU cross border licence penalty system.Ironically in that case ( hopefully ) it will be our speed matters allies amongst the Germans who'll stop it.
GreigM said:
XJ Flyer said:
In this case it isn't a 'UK' law it is a 'Scottish' one.
The limit is set by the Scottish government, however the law is a UK one, which applies to your UK driving license.XJ Flyer said:
If it was a 'UK' law it would apply throughout the UK
(for the third time)The applicable law is the Road Traffic Act 1988, section 5. That applies - UNLIKE OTHER PARTS OF RTA88 - to England, Wales, Scotland and NI. RTA88s5 will STILL apply. The wording won't change. The ONLY difference is in the "prescribed limit" applicable.
How about instead of Scotland, the limit was being reduced to 50 for HGV and PSV drivers...? If somebody was stopped driving an HGV whilst between 50 and 80, they'd lose their licence. And that licence loss would apply to ALL classes of vehicle, right...?
Phatboy317 said:
TwigtheWonderkid said:
Losing your licence akin to prison.....are you on drugs?
I'm not sure you're aware, but not being able to drive still allows you to walk, ride a pushbike, take the bus, train, taxi, or get a lift from someone else.
You evidently didn't notice the "for a great many people" bit.I'm not sure you're aware, but not being able to drive still allows you to walk, ride a pushbike, take the bus, train, taxi, or get a lift from someone else.
Edited by TwigtheWonderkid on Saturday 6th December 17:40
Dammit said:
Would it be a bad thing, getting points on your UK licence for breaking the law in Forrin, and vice versa?
It would seem to be an advantage of the EU that dangerously poor drivers could be banned more efficiently by bringing their transgressions abroad back home with them.
That would obviously be the view of the type of nazis that are trying to impose that idea across the EU.It would seem to be an advantage of the EU that dangerously poor drivers could be banned more efficiently by bringing their transgressions abroad back home with them.
The issue being that exceeding the Scottish drink drive limit isn't 'dangerous'.Just as exceeding the French autoroute limit is no more 'dangerous' than running at the same but 'legal' speeds in Germany.Which is what the argument and UK agenda is all about.
XJ Flyer said:
That would obviously be the view of the type of nazis that are trying to impose that idea across the EU.
The issue being that exceeding the Scottish drink drive limit isn't 'dangerous'.Just as exceeding the French autoroute limit is no more 'dangerous' than running at the same but 'legal' speeds in Germany.Which is what the argument and UK agenda is all about.
Ah, ok - I didn't realise that one of the central tenets of the Nazi party was that one should obey the relevant laws in the place you happened to be.The issue being that exceeding the Scottish drink drive limit isn't 'dangerous'.Just as exceeding the French autoroute limit is no more 'dangerous' than running at the same but 'legal' speeds in Germany.Which is what the argument and UK agenda is all about.
Thanks for clearing that up - I didn't realise that childish self interest was in fact anti-Nazi, it makes it much more palatable to think of it that way.
TooMany2cvs said:
XJ Flyer said:
If it was a 'UK' law it would apply throughout the UK
(for the third time)The applicable law is the Road Traffic Act 1988, section 5. That applies - UNLIKE OTHER PARTS OF RTA88 - to England, Wales, Scotland and NI. RTA88s5 will STILL apply. The wording won't change. The ONLY difference is in the "prescribed limit" applicable.
How about instead of Scotland, the limit was being reduced to 50 for HGV and PSV drivers...? If somebody was stopped driving an HGV whilst between 50 and 80, they'd lose their licence. And that licence loss would apply to ALL classes of vehicle, right...?
Dammit said:
XJ Flyer said:
That would obviously be the view of the type of nazis that are trying to impose that idea across the EU.
The issue being that exceeding the Scottish drink drive limit isn't 'dangerous'.Just as exceeding the French autoroute limit is no more 'dangerous' than running at the same but 'legal' speeds in Germany.Which is what the argument and UK agenda is all about.
Ah, ok - I didn't realise that one of the central tenets of the Nazi party was that one should obey the relevant laws in the place you happened to be.The issue being that exceeding the Scottish drink drive limit isn't 'dangerous'.Just as exceeding the French autoroute limit is no more 'dangerous' than running at the same but 'legal' speeds in Germany.Which is what the argument and UK agenda is all about.
Thanks for clearing that up - I didn't realise that childish self interest was in fact anti-Nazi, it makes it much more palatable to think of it that way.
Does the Scottish regulatory body have the power to impose a UK wide reduction?
Could it be that they are convinced that it will lead to fewer KSI's, and therefore that to not introduce it would be irresponsible, and therefore did so, even though it would lead to an imbalance in permitted levels of blood alcohol between Scotland and England?
OR, are you right and it's one big conspiracy to give you points on your licence for speeding in Bremen?
Could it be that they are convinced that it will lead to fewer KSI's, and therefore that to not introduce it would be irresponsible, and therefore did so, even though it would lead to an imbalance in permitted levels of blood alcohol between Scotland and England?
OR, are you right and it's one big conspiracy to give you points on your licence for speeding in Bremen?
Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff