MHA deputy Chief speaks out

MHA deputy Chief speaks out

Author
Discussion

paulmakin

659 posts

141 months

Thursday 27th August 2015
quotequote all
Not necessarily. Approx 80% of CCGs are chaired by a GP but a much smaller % of the accountable officers are practicing clinicians. In practice, the bulk of the personnel have migrated from the old PCTs.

to really mess up purchasing we should consider reverting to GP multi-funds

paul

anonymous-user

54 months

Thursday 27th August 2015
quotequote all
Greendubber said:
carinaman said:
Its been happening for a while and appears to be working.
Agreed. I have first-hand experience of it and it works.

Eclassy

1,201 posts

122 months

Friday 28th August 2015
quotequote all
Good news

Cells should only be used for criminals not people suffering mental health issues or innocent pepole prejudiced/incompetent officers dont take a liking to.

davemac250

4,499 posts

205 months

Friday 28th August 2015
quotequote all
It's not them, it's you

Greendubber

13,206 posts

203 months

Friday 28th August 2015
quotequote all
Eclassy said:
Good news

Cells should only be used for criminals not people suffering mental health issues or innocent pepole prejudiced/incompetent officers dont take a liking to.
So so tiresome.

FurryExocet

3,011 posts

181 months

Friday 28th August 2015
quotequote all
Eclassy said:
Good news

Cells should only be used for criminals not people suffering mental health issues .
If only you had ended it there, your post would have been worth something..........

masermartin

1,629 posts

177 months

Friday 28th August 2015
quotequote all
It's not just at level 5 support (sectioning) where the system is completely useless. Moving from level 2 to 3 in Hampshire you can be "lost in the system" for 230 days. Their target's 90, and that's preposterous enough as it is when you consider that someone's decided these people need more considered, face to face support. Abandoning them for 90 days is a bit st as a best case scenario, let alone 230.

anonymous-user

54 months

Friday 28th August 2015
quotequote all
Eclassy said:
Good news

Cells should only be used for criminals not people suffering mental health issues
Not true. There are plenty of people with mental health issues who have the capacity to stand trial and commit crimes who require arresting.

Your wonderful knowledge shows its hand once more laugh


Red Devil

13,060 posts

208 months

Friday 28th August 2015
quotequote all
La Liga said:
Greendubber said:
carinaman said:
Its been happening for a while and appears to be working.
Agreed. I have first-hand experience of it and it works.
The real question is whether it is working in specific areas or country wide. We all know how the government likes to give selective examples to 'prove' some strategy or other is succeeding. The Devil, as always, is in the detail.

Greendubber

13,206 posts

203 months

Friday 28th August 2015
quotequote all
Red Devil said:
The real question is whether it is working in specific areas or country wide. We all know how the government likes to give selective examples to 'prove' some strategy or other is succeeding. The Devil, as always, is in the detail.
In my force you have a bobby, CPN and a paramedic in a car to respond to that kind of job. Seems to remove barriers when the Police ask the relevant organisation to do their jobs biggrin

paulmakin

659 posts

141 months

Saturday 29th August 2015
quotequote all
agree that things work better when people are asked to do their jobs but it cuts both ways.

I have in front of me, on what we jokingly refer to as "my desk", a document that runs to over 100 double sided pages. It's an InterAgency Protocol on The Management Of The Mentally Ill in ......

Although titled InterAgency it was written by the area force - i know, i was there - and the local authorities and health services were invited in once the document was drafted.

In the last two weeks i have had requests from 3 different officers for a copy as they do not yet have it -it went live in June of this year and is a revision of a previous protocol, not wholly new. My area of clinical responsibility is quite small (a psychological medicine service to an acute hospital situated in a medium sized town in the SE) and 3 is a significant number when compared with the volume of referrals from Police into that clinical area.

The parts that officers seem to struggle with are usually the ones that start "Officers will.." or "Officers must not.." etc. On more than one occasion, despite having a copy of the document in front of them, there have been disagreements, one of which required the intercession of the on-call social services director for the county. That really shouldn't have been necessary had all parties been aware of, and doing, their jobs.

paul