pg9 - power of seizure

Author
Discussion

simon1987

Original Poster:

401 posts

135 months

Wednesday 25th February 2015
quotequote all
yes or no?

Ian Geary

4,480 posts

192 months

Wednesday 25th February 2015
quotequote all
simon1987 said:
yes or no?
Do these answers come with a question?

14-7

6,233 posts

191 months

Wednesday 25th February 2015
quotequote all
And the question is?

Jasandjules

69,867 posts

229 months

Wednesday 25th February 2015
quotequote all
No.

What is the question?

Slidingpillar

761 posts

136 months

Wednesday 25th February 2015
quotequote all
Bit like the folk who write a letter of statement to a public body. They're really asking questions, but the letter they wrote doesn't include a single question mark.

R_U_LOCAL

2,677 posts

208 months

Wednesday 25th February 2015
quotequote all
PG9 is a prohibition notice, not a seizure notice.

SVTRick

3,633 posts

195 months

Wednesday 25th February 2015
quotequote all
PGT
Good quality builders grade tea smile

Greendubber

13,168 posts

203 months

Thursday 26th February 2015
quotequote all
PG9 is a prohibition, the mileage and defect is recorded and a marker put on PNC. This is removed when the vehicle is road worthy again.

If the vehicle is driven before it is repaired I believe there is a power to seize it.

I'm not traffic so I might wrong though....

simon1987

Original Poster:

401 posts

135 months

Thursday 26th February 2015
quotequote all
I dont understand your difficulty in understanding the question.

If a car is tax and insured and gets a pg9 for say a bald tyre and and a blowing exhaust. Are they grounds for seizure? I have been given no other paper work other than the prohibition notice and have no pending prosecutions on the matter. But when reading the pg9 the next day there was no mention of anything related to the seizure of the car or the reason for it.

mph1977

12,467 posts

168 months

Friday 27th February 2015
quotequote all
can you explain the background of the situation and what has actually happened ? your postings are rather cryptic.

simon1987

Original Poster:

401 posts

135 months

Friday 27th February 2015
quotequote all
blues and twos, pulled over.

after breath test, insurance check etc decided to check the car. found the tyre was below legal limits. started writing me up for that when two other coppers turned up. One of them was a traffic officer and offered to give the car a once over.

They found the exhaust system was blowing.
The tyre was low
and the battery wasnt clamped down

and revoked the mot and seized the car.

All work has been done and the car has a fresh mot (Took less than an hour).

Not getting done for the tyre as the copper said it was getting expensive enough with the £150 recovery i had to pay to get it back.

Im just at a loss to why the car was seized. The tyre was worn but the spare was in the boot. I could have changed it at the road side.

Just really strange

AlexRS2782

8,040 posts

213 months

Friday 27th February 2015
quotequote all
Bit of an escalation / change in story from this - http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a... - unless that's a seperate incident.

simon1987

Original Poster:

401 posts

135 months

Friday 27th February 2015
quotequote all
just lol for going though my old messages.

This even happened about 3 days after that. Tail lights were in perfect working order.

Spangles

1,441 posts

185 months

Friday 27th February 2015
quotequote all
Did they seize it because you'd already been reported for the bald tyre but done bugger all about it?

The Mad Monk

10,474 posts

117 months

Friday 27th February 2015
quotequote all
As somebody said on the 18th February in your other inadequate maintenance thread:-

"Dodgy electrics and a bald tyre ! Little more car maintenance required, possibly ?"

R_U_LOCAL

2,677 posts

208 months

Friday 27th February 2015
quotequote all
There are two types of prohibition - immediate and delayed.

A delayed prohibition will allow the driver to drive to one single place - usually a garage - to have a defect repaired. To have the prohibition lifted, the car will need to pass a full MOT.

An immediate prohibition means that the car is not safe and roadworthy. Officers will not allow the car to be driven any further and recovery is the only option. Again, the car will require a full MOT before the prohibition can be lifted.

So, OP, your car wasn't seized, it was recovered, to protect you and other road users because it was a dangerous shed. Try acting a bit more responsibly.

Davie_GLA

6,521 posts

199 months

Friday 27th February 2015
quotequote all
What an arrogant way to come on here and ask for help!

pg9 - yes or no????? What??? Are we all supposed to know what this is?


Greendubber

13,168 posts

203 months

Friday 27th February 2015
quotequote all
Davie_GLA said:
What an arrogant way to come on here and ask for help!

pg9 - yes or no????? What??? Are we all supposed to know what this is?
Especially when it appears the Police were well within reason to lift the car due to its poor state of repair smile

Du1point8

21,606 posts

192 months

Friday 27th February 2015
quotequote all
simon1987 said:
blues and twos, pulled over.

after breath test, insurance check etc decided to check the car. found the tyre was below legal limits. started writing me up for that when two other coppers turned up. One of them was a traffic officer and offered to give the car a once over.

They found the exhaust system was blowing.
The tyre was low
and the battery wasnt clamped down

and revoked the mot and seized the car.

All work has been done and the car has a fresh mot (Took less than an hour).

Not getting done for the tyre as the copper said it was getting expensive enough with the £150 recovery i had to pay to get it back.

Im just at a loss to why the car was seized. The tyre was worn but the spare was in the boot. I could have changed it at the road side.

Just really strange
So lets get this straight... you had a bad tyre on 18th feb... then got done again and your defence is that the spare was in the boot and they should have allowed you to change it.

Why did you not change it before getting done?

I think I know the answer, but want to hear why you didn't and are now annoyed that the police didn't allow you to do it.

omgus

7,305 posts

175 months

Friday 27th February 2015
quotequote all
OP, judging on this thread (and the other thread) i would say OP that you have a caqr that is not looked after properly and when a traffic officer has looked over it you have comprehensively failed the attitude test.


Learn to pass the attitude test and life gets much fking easier if you get pulled over.