Good money maker today
Discussion
LoonR1 said:
I don't believe you, but how about this. If you scan and post it, then I'll pay for your wife's fine or SAC and any increase in her car insurance premium as a result for the next 5 years whilst this is on her licence and declareable for insurance purposes.
Come on, there's a good incentive in there to prove me wrong and get some money out of me.
Over to you
But the money is of no concern to him Come on, there's a good incentive in there to prove me wrong and get some money out of me.
Over to you
It clearly didn't happen as posted, so no ticket will appear
TwigtheWonderkid said:
tony wright said:
In reality it's the opposite to safety. We constantly have to check our speedos, rather than watching the bloody road.
Regardless of what our individual views are on speeding and its enforcement, this line that's trotted out on an all too regular basis is the biggest load of old tripe on PH.If this actually applies to you, if you really cannot stay below a posted limit without constantly checking your speedo, then the sooner you incur 12 points and are hoofed off the road the better for all of us.
FurryExocet said:
But the money is of no concern to him
It clearly didn't happen as posted, so no ticket will appear
Agreed. We all know it didn't happen at the speed suggested, but I'm bored of the BS claims on here about being done for such low speeds. I've been done a fair few times in my life and all of them were well over the limit. It clearly didn't happen as posted, so no ticket will appear
I'm going to ask for proof and make offers like te above on all of them. Failure to provide is sufficient proof that it didn't happen IMO. If they provide it then I'll pay.
The entrapment claim adds a rare jewel to an otherwise boring missive.
What police act induced OP to drive at a fictional 34mph, do we think?
Was it the lure of a undercover cyclist's tight fitting arse-lycra?
Was it chemtrails bearing with them the basic plot premise of the film 'Death Race 2000'?
Enquiring minds demand to know.
What police act induced OP to drive at a fictional 34mph, do we think?
Was it the lure of a undercover cyclist's tight fitting arse-lycra?
Was it chemtrails bearing with them the basic plot premise of the film 'Death Race 2000'?
Enquiring minds demand to know.
Devil2575 said:
TwigtheWonderkid said:
tony wright said:
In reality it's the opposite to safety. We constantly have to check our speedos, rather than watching the bloody road.
Regardless of what our individual views are on speeding and its enforcement, this line that's trotted out on an all too regular basis is the biggest load of old tripe on PH.If this actually applies to you, if you really cannot stay below a posted limit without constantly checking your speedo, then the sooner you incur 12 points and are hoofed off the road the better for all of us.
LoonR1 said:
Agreed. We all know it didn't happen at the speed suggested, but I'm bored of the BS claims on here about being done for such low speeds. I've been done a fair few times in my life and all of them were well over the limit.
I got a speeding ticket for doing 30 Loon! If I post it up here would you pay my premiums for 5 years?Admittedly it was in a 20 limit but if you don't ask you don't get.
LoonR1 said:
Agreed. We all know it didn't happen at the speed suggested, but I'm bored of the BS claims on here about being done for such low speeds. I've been done a fair few times in my life and all of them were well over the limit.
I'm going to ask for proof and make offers like te above on all of them. Failure to provide is sufficient proof that it didn't happen IMO. If they provide it then I'll pay.
Thanks for the offer but like I said, the money and course are of absolutely no concern, she'll attend and that will be that. I must admit I'm impressed at the tenacity to disprove the speed though. My main point was exactly how this was set up and what a calculated piece of work it was by a police force who apparently don't have enough resources? Maybe it was a sheer coincidence, I very much doubt it though. If this all has been lost in the thread while you have been arguing among yourselves then you need to read it all again. Or not. I don't mind. Slow day today, 4mph slower than yesterday infact I'm going to ask for proof and make offers like te above on all of them. Failure to provide is sufficient proof that it didn't happen IMO. If they provide it then I'll pay.
yonex said:
Thanks for the offer but like I said, the money and course are of absolutely no concern, she'll attend and that will be that. I must admit I'm impressed at the tenacity to disprove the speed though. My main point was exactly how this was set up and what a calculated piece of work it was by a police force who apparently don't have enough resources? Maybe it was a sheer coincidence, I very much doubt it though. If this all has been lost in the thread while you have been arguing among yourselves then you need to read it all again. Or not. I don't mind. Slow day today, 4mph slower than yesterday infact
I did offer. Just pop the NIP up on here and all will be good too. JagXJR said:
That's how it is on PH these days, post something and then get loads of silly people trying to make it into something it's not.
I believe you have been guilty of that with me if my memory serves me correctly, so you can hardly complain
Who me? Were you the one who parks in P&C spaces and thinks children are the embodiment of Satan himself, or the one who was going to 'kill a cyclist'? I lose track of everyone's misdemeanors I believe you have been guilty of that with me if my memory serves me correctly, so you can hardly complain
Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff