Mobile phone in cradle - legal to use? Recent test cases?

Mobile phone in cradle - legal to use? Recent test cases?

Author
Discussion

allergictocheese

1,290 posts

113 months

Monday 2nd March 2015
quotequote all
AndyNetwork said:
Just read this, and could a woman get off on a technicality, as the actual wording says "him"?
No. He/Him are interchangeable with She/Her.

mph1977

12,467 posts

168 months

Monday 2nd March 2015
quotequote all
AndyNetwork said:
allergictocheese said:
No, the actual wording is here (the relevant regulation is 110 of the Construction and Use Regulations 1986).

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2003/2695/regul...
Just read this, and could a woman get off on a technicality, as the actual wording says "him"?
that's a new wibblist approach, except of course the preamble to the vastest majority of documents make it clear that he / him can also be read as she / her ...

agtlaw

6,702 posts

206 months

Monday 2nd March 2015
quotequote all
AndyNetwork said:
Just read this, and could a woman get off on a technicality, as the actual wording says "him"?
Ludicrous point. See Interpretation Act, section 6.

threadlock

Original Poster:

3,196 posts

254 months

Monday 2nd March 2015
quotequote all
allergictocheese said:
No, the actual wording is here (the relevant regulation is 110 of the Construction and Use Regulations 1986).

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2003/2695/regul...
Ah, thanks. That seems fairly clear. Appreciate the link.

agtlaw said:
Hand-held + using = offence

Cradle + using = not an offence, unless "not in proper control" - in which case, slightly different offence, same penalty.
And given your profession, thank you for your input too. smile