'Justice for Henry Hicks'
Discussion
Greendubber said:
La Liga said:
anonymous said:
[redacted]
I expect you're correct and it'll be similar to the family of Mark Duggan / Menezes (the latter one can certainly sympathise with), where the families will keep ploughing along fruitless legal routes. I am not a big fan, to say the least, of nothing to hide, nothing to fear.
But that being said, I've been pulled many times by the police (with blues and twos) and never once have I thought - I'll outrun them.......
I can't help but think there is no legitimate reason to attempt to run from a police car with the blue lights on....
But that being said, I've been pulled many times by the police (with blues and twos) and never once have I thought - I'll outrun them.......
I can't help but think there is no legitimate reason to attempt to run from a police car with the blue lights on....
Greendubber said:
La Liga said:
anonymous said:
[redacted]
I expect you're correct and it'll be similar to the family of Mark Duggan / Menezes (the latter one can certainly sympathise with), where the families will keep ploughing along fruitless legal routes. Oh, I think they give as good (if that's the right word) as they get.
Greendubber said:
Whilst all the time the bobbies involved get put through the mill over and over again....
Accountability should be part of the job, an every day occurrence due the nature of the work. But that accountability shouldn't be driven by the family but the IPCC once they reach a verdict that should be the end of it.Greendubber said:
I'd imagine based on the amount of stop and search he was on the radar and being looked at.
As you'll know. Previous history isn't sufficient grounds on its own for stop and search. Without some supporting information it's unlikely the pursuit would have been authorised.Bigends said:
Greendubber said:
I'd imagine based on the amount of stop and search he was on the radar and being looked at.
As you'll know. Previous history isn't sufficient grounds on its own for stop and search. Without some supporting information it's unlikely the pursuit would have been authorised.My point was they could have been watching him and may have witnessed a deal hence the request to stop. I know when we do it we have to tell the control room inspector why. "Reason for pursuit is that I have just seen the rider/driver carry out what I suspect to be a drug deal"
I've heard authority given for vehicles purely making off that have a drugs marker, its not often they get refused.
It would be interesting to know how long it ran.
Edited by Greendubber on Tuesday 28th June 18:49
Greendubber said:
I do know that, and you dont know what the reason for pursuit was.
My point was they could have been watching him and may have witnessed a deal hence the request to stop. I know when we do it we have to tell the control room inspector why. "Reason for pursuit is that I have just seen the rider/driver carry out what I suspect to be a drug deal"
I've heard authority given for vehicles purely making off that have a drugs marker, its not often they get refused.
It would be interesting to know how long it ran.
I'd imagined they'd seen him dealing them the pursuit may well have been initially authorised. Be interesting when the misconduct hearings underway to see what the reason wsdMy point was they could have been watching him and may have witnessed a deal hence the request to stop. I know when we do it we have to tell the control room inspector why. "Reason for pursuit is that I have just seen the rider/driver carry out what I suspect to be a drug deal"
I've heard authority given for vehicles purely making off that have a drugs marker, its not often they get refused.
It would be interesting to know how long it ran.
Edited by Greendubber on Tuesday 28th June 18:49
Bigends said:
Greendubber said:
I do know that, and you dont know what the reason for pursuit was.
My point was they could have been watching him and may have witnessed a deal hence the request to stop. I know when we do it we have to tell the control room inspector why. "Reason for pursuit is that I have just seen the rider/driver carry out what I suspect to be a drug deal"
I've heard authority given for vehicles purely making off that have a drugs marker, its not often they get refused.
It would be interesting to know how long it ran.
I'd imagined they'd seen him dealing them the pursuit may well have been initially authorised. Be interesting when the misconduct hearings underway to see what the reason wsdMy point was they could have been watching him and may have witnessed a deal hence the request to stop. I know when we do it we have to tell the control room inspector why. "Reason for pursuit is that I have just seen the rider/driver carry out what I suspect to be a drug deal"
I've heard authority given for vehicles purely making off that have a drugs marker, its not often they get refused.
It would be interesting to know how long it ran.
Edited by Greendubber on Tuesday 28th June 18:49
Some people on here need to take a long hard look at themselves. Can't believe some of the comments.
Now i for one hope the lying corrupt covering up, Islington police officers get all that's coming to them. They had rules to follow, but clearly took it on themselves to push this young lad to his death. I know they never expected the young lad to die, however their actions and lack of following procudure clearly contributed to his death. Just like the South Yorkshire police tried to cover up 96 deaths. And now in London it's still happining today. The boy come from a good home, never had a criminal record, and was always polite , the Poilce admitted that! A mother father and sisters and brother a grieving, all because for police officers chose not to follow police rules. That are made to protect the public.
Shame on you , who posted dierogotry remarks. And I hope something like this, never happens you any of you or your family.
Now i for one hope the lying corrupt covering up, Islington police officers get all that's coming to them. They had rules to follow, but clearly took it on themselves to push this young lad to his death. I know they never expected the young lad to die, however their actions and lack of following procudure clearly contributed to his death. Just like the South Yorkshire police tried to cover up 96 deaths. And now in London it's still happining today. The boy come from a good home, never had a criminal record, and was always polite , the Poilce admitted that! A mother father and sisters and brother a grieving, all because for police officers chose not to follow police rules. That are made to protect the public.
Shame on you , who posted dierogotry remarks. And I hope something like this, never happens you any of you or your family.
Ahh a Hillsborough comparison, do please bore off it was 27 years ago. So what if he was from a good home, cant possibly have ever done anything wrong because of that could he?
For someone who doesnt like allegations you're not half throwing a lot around yourself.
As for your mention of rules, what about the rules about carrying weed and not stopping when told to do so by the police? They didnt push him to his death at all, he decided to make a run for it.
For someone who doesnt like allegations you're not half throwing a lot around yourself.
As for your mention of rules, what about the rules about carrying weed and not stopping when told to do so by the police? They didnt push him to his death at all, he decided to make a run for it.
Edited by Greendubber on Tuesday 28th June 19:33
les, what about the rules about carrying weed and not stopping when told to do so by the police? They didnt push him to his death at all, he decided to make a run for it.
Haha ha The police officers stressed over and over they did not signal him to stop. They wanted to have fun.
That backfired and now they will lose everything.
Haha ha The police officers stressed over and over they did not signal him to stop. They wanted to have fun.
That backfired and now they will lose everything.
Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff