Hands up who saw this coming...

Hands up who saw this coming...

Author
Discussion

handpaper

Original Poster:

1,294 posts

203 months

Tuesday 19th May 2015
quotequote all
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-ord...

Is the Police Federation representative here? Any PH BiB care to comment?

ETA - the poll a little way down the page is disgusting.

HantsRat

2,369 posts

108 months

Tuesday 19th May 2015
quotequote all
About time it's lowered in my opinion.

ianrb

1,531 posts

140 months

Tuesday 19th May 2015
quotequote all
I spend half my life in Scotland and I'm completely happy with the lower limit there, so can think of no reason why it shouldn't apply in England and Wales too.

Davel

8,982 posts

258 months

Tuesday 19th May 2015
quotequote all
If you're driving, don't drink - simple.

All for lowering the limit personally.

Corpulent Tosser

5,459 posts

245 months

Tuesday 19th May 2015
quotequote all
I am not too bothered either way, though I was against the change ion Scotland on the grounds of the existing limit being acceptable and it was change for the sake of change.

Drink drivers will drink and drive, regardless of the limit, it will have more affect on people who currently abide by the law, the change in the law in Scotland has certainly stopped both my wife and daughter from having a small glass of wine with lunch as they used to do.

agtlaw

6,702 posts

206 months

Tuesday 19th May 2015
quotequote all
Lower limit. Lower penalty.

Ken Figenus

5,706 posts

117 months

Tuesday 19th May 2015
quotequote all
Its just too risky to judge your blood alcohol level on the fly. A large glass of red could put me over the limit if its 14.5%. Plus then I'd likely want another one (and then maybe a curry) LOL.

Much as I hate increased legislation and big brother always thinking of new ways of restricting and clamping down on the citizen (especially if there is money to be made or career prospects involved) for me its either drive or drink - never both.

Corpulent Tosser

5,459 posts

245 months

Tuesday 19th May 2015
quotequote all
agtlaw said:
Lower limit. Lower penalty.
I wrote to my MSP before the change was ratified to ask if when adopting the European limit they would also adopt the European sentencing, ban over 80mg/100ml, fine between 50 and 79mg/100ml.

She didn't even answer my mail.

ruggedscotty

5,625 posts

209 months

Tuesday 19th May 2015
quotequote all


Got into a landrover with someone who had been drinking.... simple dont drink and drive.

It can and it does go wrong..... and when it does you might not get out the mess alive.

Corpulent Tosser

5,459 posts

245 months

Tuesday 19th May 2015
quotequote all
ruggedscotty said:
Got into a landrover with someone who had been drinking.... simple dont drink and drive.

It can and it does go wrong..... and when it does you might not get out the mess alive.
Was the driver's consumption in the 50-80mg/100ml range or was he over the existing limit ?

FunkyNige

8,881 posts

275 months

Tuesday 19th May 2015
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Not sure we need to design a lab study, everyone gets breathalysed after an accident anyway (don't they?), just collate those numbers.
If there are lots of people crashing with 50-80 mg/dL of alcohol in their blood then lower the limit, if not then don't.

tony wright

1,004 posts

250 months

Tuesday 19th May 2015
quotequote all
People who drink and drive will always do it. Dropping the limit to 50mg per 100 will not change their habit one iota.

I see it as more Big Brother, Nanny state crap. I admit to having a pint (always followed by a coffee) after a game of golf for the last thirty years, never ever felt it comromised my ability to drive. So here we go again, our so called poxy leaders and righteous career chasing pratts telling me I'll have to change my ways yet againmad

Pete317

1,430 posts

222 months

Tuesday 19th May 2015
quotequote all
Ken Figenus said:
Its just too risky to judge your blood alcohol level on the fly. A large glass of red could put me over the limit if its 14.5%. Plus then I'd likely want another one (and then maybe a curry) LOL.

Much as I hate increased legislation and big brother always thinking of new ways of restricting and clamping down on the citizen (especially if there is money to be made or career prospects involved) for me its either drive or drink - never both.
Ah, but would you be quite sure you're not over the limit the next morning, or even the next afternoon?

Devil2575

13,400 posts

188 months

Tuesday 19th May 2015
quotequote all
handpaper said:
ETA - the poll a little way down the page is disgusting.
Why?

Devil2575

13,400 posts

188 months

Tuesday 19th May 2015
quotequote all
tony wright said:
People who drink and drive will always do it. Dropping the limit to 50mg per 100 will not change their habit one iota.

I see it as more Big Brother, Nanny state crap. I admit to having a pint (always followed by a coffee) after a game of golf for the last thirty years, never ever felt it comromised my ability to drive. So here we go again, our so called poxy leaders and righteous career chasing pratts telling me I'll have to change my ways yet againmad
You're talking about hardened drink drivers who don't bother about the limit now. I suspect the aim of this is to send a message to people saying that it's not ok to have even a single drink and then drive. This then helps to avoid people getting behind the wheel who think they're ok but aren't.

I'm not sure what relevance a coffee afterwards has to your point?

Ilovetwiglets

695 posts

168 months

Tuesday 19th May 2015
quotequote all
Quite a step forward from the 1970s...

Rude-boy

22,227 posts

233 months

Tuesday 19th May 2015
quotequote all
I am not against this per se but do see it something designed to catch more of the 'morning after' drivers.


Jasandjules

69,868 posts

229 months

Tuesday 19th May 2015
quotequote all
How much booze can be consumed before a 50mg limit is breached?

Chimune

3,176 posts

223 months

Tuesday 19th May 2015
quotequote all
tony wright said:
People who drink and drive will always do it. Dropping the limit to 50mg per 100 will not change their habit one iota.

I see it as more Big Brother, Nanny state crap. I admit to having a pint (always followed by a coffee) after a game of golf for the last thirty years, never ever felt it comromised my ability to drive. So here we go again, our so called poxy leaders and righteous career chasing pratts telling me I'll have to change my ways yet againmad
Ho hum. that's terrible.
You should have taken the opportunity to blame the EU too .....


surveyor

17,811 posts

184 months

Tuesday 19th May 2015
quotequote all
It's not politically correct, but I do (as a bulky bloke) have 2 pints of Fosters once a week at a country pub. If I'm drinking nicer stronger lager it means that I have a lift sorted.

I would like to know what the effect has been on Scottish roads in terms of Deaths and Injuries etc since they changed their laws.

ETA - Looking at the worst places, many seem to be in the more rural areas where taxis are not so easy to find.