Oh Dear - some one is going to be in a little bit of trouble

Oh Dear - some one is going to be in a little bit of trouble

Author
Discussion

LoonR1

26,988 posts

178 months

Friday 22nd May 2015
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
I guess you mean "policy" hehe

Just get it repaired on the policy. Premiums tend not to go up much at all for claims on home insurance, especially when they'll recover all the costs in time.

bad company

18,639 posts

267 months

Friday 22nd May 2015
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Seriously do it now. There is every chance you insurers can recover the costs from the scrote's insurer. Best get in quick tho.

LoonR1

26,988 posts

178 months

Friday 22nd May 2015
quotequote all
bad company said:
Seriously do it now. There is every chance you insurers can recover the costs from the scrote's insurer. Best get in quick tho.
You're right. He's only got six years to lodge his claim with the van driver's insurers.

bad company

18,639 posts

267 months

Friday 22nd May 2015
quotequote all
LoonR1 said:
bad company said:
Seriously do it now. There is every chance you insurers can recover the costs from the scrote's insurer. Best get in quick tho.
You're right. He's only got six years to lodge his claim with the van driver's insurers.
Sounds great in theory but in practice it is much better if the op's insurers are advised soonest.

Do you really think the insurance co would entertain a claim 6 years after the event?

LoonR1

26,988 posts

178 months

Friday 22nd May 2015
quotequote all
bad company said:
Sounds great in theory but in practice it is much better if the op's insurers are advised soonest.

Do you really think the insurance co would entertain a claim 6 years after the event?
They don't get to choose whether they "entertain a claim" when a third party is claiming off them. They are ultimately defendant not claimant. If the claimant makes his case and their (potentially ex) customer doesn't give them a defence, then they'll be paying out.

bad company

18,639 posts

267 months

Friday 22nd May 2015
quotequote all
LoonR1 said:
They don't get to choose whether they "entertain a claim" when a third party is claiming off them. They are ultimately defendant not claimant. If the claimant makes his case and their (potentially ex) customer doesn't give them a defence, then they'll be paying out.
So you don't think they would query why you waited 6 years?

Delay can weaken the claim, what is to be gained by delay?

LoonR1

26,988 posts

178 months

Friday 22nd May 2015
quotequote all
bad company said:
So you don't think they would query why you waited 6 years?

Delay can weaken the claim, what is to be gained by delay?
They can ask and the answer is "I have six years to make a claim". It neither weakens nor strengthens a case by default, but it can help as the culprit may not reply so they have no defence

bad company

18,639 posts

267 months

Friday 22nd May 2015
quotequote all
LoonR1 said:
bad company said:
So you don't think they would query why you waited 6 years?

Delay can weaken the claim, what is to be gained by delay?
They can ask and the answer is "I have six years to make a claim". It neither weakens nor strengthens a case by default, but it can help as the culprit may not reply so they have no defence
OK, you clearly seem to know best. rolleyes

LoonR1

26,988 posts

178 months

Friday 22nd May 2015
quotequote all
bad company said:
OK, you clearly seem to know best. rolleyes
Quite probably.

silentbrown

8,850 posts

117 months

Friday 22nd May 2015
quotequote all
I can barely remember who insures my car now, let alone 6 years ago. I certainly don't have policy documents going that far back....

Alucidnation

16,810 posts

171 months

Friday 22nd May 2015
quotequote all
pics?

Vaud

50,583 posts

156 months

Friday 22nd May 2015
quotequote all
bad company said:
OK, you clearly seem to know best. rolleyes
In this case, he does.

bad company

18,639 posts

267 months

Friday 22nd May 2015
quotequote all
Vaud said:
In this case, he does.
That depends on if you prefer to take a pragmatic or a 'fluffy bunny' approach.

Pints

18,444 posts

195 months

Saturday 23rd May 2015
quotequote all
bad company said:
Vaud said:
In this case, he does.
That depends on if you prefer to take a pragmatic or a 'fluffy bunny' approach.
Or, as in Loon's case, the "been in the industry for years so I know what I'm talking about "approach.

PoleDriver

28,642 posts

195 months

Saturday 23rd May 2015
quotequote all
Dogwatch said:
These things can be dragged out for months until you lose the wall to live.
FTFY
getmecoat

boyse7en

6,738 posts

166 months

Saturday 23rd May 2015
quotequote all
0000 said:
Have you checked there isn't a Yodel 'Sorry we missed you' note in the rubble somewhere?
Shouldn't that be a 'Sorry we hit you' note

LoonR1

26,988 posts

178 months

Saturday 23rd May 2015
quotequote all
silentbrown said:
I can barely remember who insures my car now, let alone 6 years ago. I certainly don't have policy documents going that far back....
you don't need them. The claim would be logged your insurers at the time. They'd get in touch with you, or at least try to, using the contact details they had on file when you held the policy. If you reply and admit it then they pay out, if you deny it they do some digging and see if you're prepared to defend as far as court. Most say yes, then admit they did it after all just before court.

Or as happens in the majority of cases, you wouldn't reply, leaving your old insurer stuffed with no defence, so they pay out.