Oh Dear - some one is going to be in a little bit of trouble
Discussion
LoonR1 said:
bad company said:
Seriously do it now. There is every chance you insurers can recover the costs from the scrote's insurer. Best get in quick tho.
You're right. He's only got six years to lodge his claim with the van driver's insurers. Do you really think the insurance co would entertain a claim 6 years after the event?
bad company said:
Sounds great in theory but in practice it is much better if the op's insurers are advised soonest.
Do you really think the insurance co would entertain a claim 6 years after the event?
They don't get to choose whether they "entertain a claim" when a third party is claiming off them. They are ultimately defendant not claimant. If the claimant makes his case and their (potentially ex) customer doesn't give them a defence, then they'll be paying out. Do you really think the insurance co would entertain a claim 6 years after the event?
LoonR1 said:
They don't get to choose whether they "entertain a claim" when a third party is claiming off them. They are ultimately defendant not claimant. If the claimant makes his case and their (potentially ex) customer doesn't give them a defence, then they'll be paying out.
So you don't think they would query why you waited 6 years? Delay can weaken the claim, what is to be gained by delay?
bad company said:
So you don't think they would query why you waited 6 years?
Delay can weaken the claim, what is to be gained by delay?
They can ask and the answer is "I have six years to make a claim". It neither weakens nor strengthens a case by default, but it can help as the culprit may not reply so they have no defenceDelay can weaken the claim, what is to be gained by delay?
LoonR1 said:
bad company said:
So you don't think they would query why you waited 6 years?
Delay can weaken the claim, what is to be gained by delay?
They can ask and the answer is "I have six years to make a claim". It neither weakens nor strengthens a case by default, but it can help as the culprit may not reply so they have no defenceDelay can weaken the claim, what is to be gained by delay?
silentbrown said:
I can barely remember who insures my car now, let alone 6 years ago. I certainly don't have policy documents going that far back....
you don't need them. The claim would be logged your insurers at the time. They'd get in touch with you, or at least try to, using the contact details they had on file when you held the policy. If you reply and admit it then they pay out, if you deny it they do some digging and see if you're prepared to defend as far as court. Most say yes, then admit they did it after all just before court. Or as happens in the majority of cases, you wouldn't reply, leaving your old insurer stuffed with no defence, so they pay out.
Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff