Caught doing 120mph on the motorway
Discussion
mybrainhurts said:
Why do you consider 120 to be dangerous?
The first criterion has come up before. It's subjective, therefore a bks piece of law making.
Not that it's at all relevant to the argument, as I've given the absolute definition of dangerous driving above, but I would consider driving at 120 mph without knowing it to be extremely dangerous, for many reasons, primarily because the situation will change considerably quicker than anticipated and the forces invovled at that speed are immense.The first criterion has come up before. It's subjective, therefore a bks piece of law making.
youngsyr said:
WinstonWolf said:
youngsyr said:
mybrainhurts said:
Sump said:
I'm sorry, you just said in that quote, 120 blink of an eye, no effort etc etc.
We just concluded that was complete BS....
You've not driven a diesel, have you?...We just concluded that was complete BS....
Anyway you cut it, you're going to notice accelerating to 120 mph, whether you do it slowly or quickly. If you don't, it's the definition of dangerous driving.
Some cars are designed to mask the sensation of speed, others are not.
Those are two factors that I cannot (and never have in 18 years of driving) overlooked.
I would question the driving ability of someone who could.
popeyewhite said:
youngsyr said:
popeyewhite said:
WinstonWolf said:
That's because you haven't been driving for very long.
This is glaringly obvious.Or is it just past your bedtime?
popeyewhite said:
LoonR1 said:
On my way to the pub but tested it in my mates GTR which will comfortably destroy your M5.
I think it'd be fair to say a GTR would destroy an M5. Ditto my road bike.
Or do you think I made it up? I'll make a video amd post it if you want, I'll even put a some words in there of your choice to prove its me
LoonR1 said:
popeyewhite said:
LoonR1 said:
On my way to the pub but tested it in my mates GTR which will comfortably destroy your M5.
I think it'd be fair to say a GTR would destroy an M5. Ditto my road bike.
Or do you think I made it up? I'll make a video amd post it if you want, I'll even put a some words in there of your choice to prove its me
Bizarre isn't it.
It is funny how they desperately cling onto the argument that heading to 50 mph over the speed limit on a motorway can happen in the blink of eye and subconsciously too. I was messing a output with some McLarens ahead of a day on track for them with Joe Public at Donington, now they can shift, but you still have to give them a push.
The GT-R is my best mates and pure coincidence, the M3 Comp Pack is mine and both of them need a shove to get going
My road bike amd my rave bike are similarly mad, but again they don't randomly head off at speeds all of their own making. I have to make them do it.
It is funny how they desperately cling onto the argument that heading to 50 mph over the speed limit on a motorway can happen in the blink of eye and subconsciously too. I was messing a output with some McLarens ahead of a day on track for them with Joe Public at Donington, now they can shift, but you still have to give them a push.
The GT-R is my best mates and pure coincidence, the M3 Comp Pack is mine and both of them need a shove to get going
My road bike amd my rave bike are similarly mad, but again they don't randomly head off at speeds all of their own making. I have to make them do it.
LoonR1 said:
What's so funny?
I think it'd be fair to say a GTR would destroy an M5.
Didn't say that though did you? Your rather predictable response was:I think it'd be fair to say a GTR would destroy an M5.
LoonR1 said:
On my way to the pub but tested it in my mates GTR which will comfortably destroy your M5.
What's funny is the schoolboy 'my-mates-car-will-destroy-your-M5', and I don't even own one. LoonR1 said:
Or do you think I made it up?
Never gave the matter a second thought TBH.
LoonR1 said:
I'll make a video amd post it if you want, I'll even put a some words in there of your choice to prove its me
Go on then. Skyline vs F10 M5. I'd say GTR up to 100 then the M5 pulls away. Remember before you ps off the //M boys trying cheap insults - I don't own one lolpopeyewhite said:
LoonR1 said:
What's so funny?
I think it'd be fair to say a GTR would destroy an M5.
Didn't say that though did you? Your rather predictable response was:I think it'd be fair to say a GTR would destroy an M5.
LoonR1 said:
On my way to the pub but tested it in my mates GTR which will comfortably destroy your M5.
What's funny is the schoolboy 'my-mates-car-will-destroy-your-M5', and I don't even own one. LoonR1 said:
Or do you think I made it up?
Never gave the matter a second thought TBH.
LoonR1 said:
I'll make a video amd post it if you want, I'll even put a some words in there of your choice to prove its me
Go on then. Skyline vs F10 M5. I'd say GTR up to 100 then the M5 pulls away. Remember before you ps off the //M boys trying cheap insults - I don't own one lolI own an M3 Comp Pack. You dismissed that out of hand as "have you ever been in an M5", so I used my mates GT-R. I'm not racing on the roads. I'll happily post 80-120 times on my own in a low gear amd a high gear on both. To be clear. I'll say those words, but I'm. It racing an M5 as that's a world of grief if caught.
If you don't own an M5, I'd suggest being a bit quieter, few M5 owners would really want to take on an GT-R in the real world. I can say that as I am an "//M boy" whatever the fk that is.
LoonR1 said:
What are you going on about.
Don't you recognise your own posts? I'm really sorry I've compromised your male pride by suggesting your M3 (masterpiece ffs) is torqueless, but you need to see my comment in the context it was said: That's it's quite possible when driving a new fast car to be surprised by its speed. This is more likely in a German luxury car with lots of torque, not an M3, something like an M5 or AMG of some description. Please, I know this won't be easy but try not to see this comment as a personal attack on your car - or your mates GTR - or your big fast motorbike, the fact is they're not relevant to the topic under discussion.
La Liga said:
popeyewhite said:
Do you mean "Why did I say that?". Why all the waffle?
popeyewhite said:
I was laughing at your use of your profession's nomenclature during a mundane discussion. Just can't help it eh?
La Liga said:
Why would you use more words, when a clear, concise and easily interpretable two words will do? It was hardly some esoteric police-acronym or obfuscated 'management speak'.
I'm sure you must have noticed the irony in your post but just thought you'd post anyway. Didn't you?
NB Don't actually see the point in your comment? The words the poster used amused me, and you don't think they should have done - was that it?
What a bizarre discussion.
You are the driver not the effing passenger, of course you can tell how fast you are going, cars have a clever device to provide this information if you cant get an idea from the rate at which you go past things.
Seriously, as a driver, if you cant tell what speed you are doing given all of the evidence around you, then really you should be taking the train.
You are the driver not the effing passenger, of course you can tell how fast you are going, cars have a clever device to provide this information if you cant get an idea from the rate at which you go past things.
Seriously, as a driver, if you cant tell what speed you are doing given all of the evidence around you, then really you should be taking the train.
I'm with LoonR1 on this one. My E55 has nearly 770ft lbs (1050nm for you 335d lovers) of torque at 2500rpm, seeing as 70mph is about 2000-2100rpm even if you don't change gear it's still about 6-8ish seconds to 120. While it's easy to do, you still notice you've done it, mostly because all traffic is now going backwards. So saying "it can happen in a split second" or "you wouldn't notice it" is utter nonsense. I can sneeze and go from 70-80, that usually takes less than a second, which is enough to get you pulled, but 70-120 is noticeable.
TheAllSeeingPie said:
I'm with LoonR1 on this one. My E55 has nearly 770ft lbs (1050nm for you 335d lovers) of torque at 2500rpm, seeing as 70mph is about 2000-2100rpm even if you don't change gear it's still about 6-8ish seconds to 120. While it's easy to do, you still notice you've done it, mostly because all traffic is now going backwards. So saying "it can happen in a split second" or "you wouldn't notice it" is utter nonsense. I can sneeze and go from 70-80, that usually takes less than a second, which is enough to get you pulled, but 70-120 is noticeable.
+1If you are driving at 120mph and think you are pootling along at 70, you probably need more help than just your licence taken away!
So, when you're driving along, how accurately can you lot judge your speed without looking at the speedo?
I can get within 5mph but I always work it out by engine noise and remembering which gear I'm in. By just looking at the scenery I wouldn't be confident of guessing very closely at all (above 80mph lets say, it's a lot easier to judge the speed limits since I'm forced to practice that). This is what makes me believe that driving a quiet car, with a linear power output would make it even tougher to judge speed.
I can get within 5mph but I always work it out by engine noise and remembering which gear I'm in. By just looking at the scenery I wouldn't be confident of guessing very closely at all (above 80mph lets say, it's a lot easier to judge the speed limits since I'm forced to practice that). This is what makes me believe that driving a quiet car, with a linear power output would make it even tougher to judge speed.
Edited by LocoCoco on Thursday 2nd July 09:34
Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff