Tattooed policemen.
Discussion
A genuine question, what are the rules or aren't there any? Just saw a policeman on the TV with a tattoo on the back of his head and on both sides of his neck, both arms were also covered. I always thought any tattoos would have to be hidden by sleeves, not sure why but it really doesn't look very professional, he appeared to be a body builder as well so more intimidating than anything.
Ilovetwiglets said:
A genuine question, what are the rules or aren't there any?
Maybe one day, there'll be some way for business and other organisations to make information publicly available, and a simple way to search that kind of information from the comfort of your own home...http://lmgtfy.com/?q=uk+police+recruit+tattoos
http://recruit.college.police.uk/Officer/Pages/eli...
Police said:
Tattoos
You should not have tattoos which could cause offence. Tattoos are not acceptable if they are particularly prominent, garish, offensive or undermine the dignity and authority of your role. Contact your chosen force if you have any particular concerns.
You should not have tattoos which could cause offence. Tattoos are not acceptable if they are particularly prominent, garish, offensive or undermine the dignity and authority of your role. Contact your chosen force if you have any particular concerns.
TooMany2cvs said:
Ilovetwiglets said:
A genuine question, what are the rules or aren't there any?
Maybe one day, there'll be some way for business and other organisations to make information publicly available, and a simple way to search that kind of information from the comfort of your own home...http://lmgtfy.com/?q=uk+police+recruit+tattoos
http://recruit.college.police.uk/Officer/Pages/eli...
Police said:
Tattoos
You should not have tattoos which could cause offence. Tattoos are not acceptable if they are particularly prominent, garish, offensive or undermine the dignity and authority of your role. Contact your chosen force if you have any particular concerns.
You should not have tattoos which could cause offence. Tattoos are not acceptable if they are particularly prominent, garish, offensive or undermine the dignity and authority of your role. Contact your chosen force if you have any particular concerns.
I wonder if the rules were brought in after more started getting tattoos? Human rights to express yourself and all that. Seems a bit of a shame though, I would certainly think a giant, muscle bound, tattooed officer would intimidate a little old lady. As long as they do the job properly it doesn't really matter.
rsv696 said:
Police officers are supposed to be representative of the communities they police, but personally I think it looks awful. It's a sad indication of how much standards have slipped.
How have standards slipped?! Just because someone has a tattoo? Grow up. Does it really matter what someone looks like as to how well they can do the job?
I work with some fantastic officers, some have tattoos, some don't.
TooMany2cvs said:
Oh, sorry. I thought you wanted to ask "a genuine question" because you genuinely wanted to know the answer.
Fair enough, I'm sure this site hasn't always been like this, it seems every time someone asks a question some smart arse tries to start an argument, why bother replying at all, surely you have something better to do?!Rick101 said:
Not a fan of tattoo's generally. Certainly shouldn't be acceptable in a public facing job in my opinion.
What's next? one of those ridiculous ear tunnel things a pierced nose and some skinny jeans?
Oh i know, its utterly shocking that someone who looks different might want a job where they are seen. I heard they even let some of thise dark skinned people and people on those ghastly wheeled chairs be seen in public too. What is the world coming to? The mail was right...What's next? one of those ridiculous ear tunnel things a pierced nose and some skinny jeans?
I would've thought that the only thing people would care about would be whether the officer can competently investigate their crime and do everything they can to bring an offender to justice. Surely that's all that matters? You can send a full bodied tattood highly competent officer to my door any day of the week over a "neat" useless one.
Ki3r said:
How have standards slipped?! Just because someone has a tattoo? Grow up.
Does it really matter what someone looks like as to how well they can do the job?
I work with some fantastic officers, some have tattoos, some don't.
When you meet someone, you have no idea how well they can do the job. The way they look, talk and act are how you decide initially if you trust them.Does it really matter what someone looks like as to how well they can do the job?
I work with some fantastic officers, some have tattoos, some don't.
For many people, tattoos are indicative of poor judgement. Permanently visible tattoos, on the hands, neck or face, especially so. It's an opinion they are fully entitled to hold.
TwigtheWonderkid said:
When you meet someone, you have no idea how well they can do the job. The way they look, talk and act are how you decide initially if you trust them.
For many people, tattoos are indicative of poor judgement. Permanently visible tattoos, on the hands, neck or face, especially so. It's an opinion they are fully entitled to hold.
To me that's no different to assuming that all young black people with hoodies carry knifes.For many people, tattoos are indicative of poor judgement. Permanently visible tattoos, on the hands, neck or face, especially so. It's an opinion they are fully entitled to hold.
It's judgemental which is the issue here.
Open your mind and hearts etc.
Some of the nicest people I know are covered in tattoos.
Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff