Assisted suicide..

Author
Discussion

Jasandjules

69,885 posts

229 months

Friday 27th November 2015
quotequote all
TwigtheWonderkid said:
And this is the argument for not allowing voluntary euthanasia. Society has a duty to protect people, especially the vulnerable, often from themselves. If people are opting for suicide when they don't actually want to die, just to protect their assets for the next generation, then society needs to step in and stop that from happening.
Well, actually, this could be a reason to ensure that the state doesn't nick assets "to protect the vulnerable"....

Problem solved.

johnxjsc1985

15,948 posts

164 months

Friday 27th November 2015
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Same here and I would sell everything I own to have her back.

OldGermanHeaps

3,830 posts

178 months

Friday 27th November 2015
quotequote all
Jasandjules said:
Well, actually, this could be a reason to ensure that the state doesn't nick assets "to protect the vulnerable"....

Problem solved.
The state isn't "nicking assets" its making sure people pay their way, when they have received thousands of pounds worth of services. Or would you prefer them being left to die on their own stting all over themself and dieing from having a fall and being undiscovered until they start to smell or one of their crotchfruit cone round to see what they can get? Where did this expectance of a big inheritace come from anyway, these spoiled fked up brats should go make something of their own life not sit there holding their hand out all the time.

Roo

11,503 posts

207 months

Friday 27th November 2015
quotequote all
Can't believe the OP is 47. I'd assumed from these threads that he was a spotty teenager.

My mum sold the family home years ago and has spent most of the money enjoying her retirement. It was her house, her money.

The fact that myself and my siblings have all stood on our own two feet probably helped as she felt we'd all made our own way in life.

ModernAndy

2,094 posts

135 months

Friday 27th November 2015
quotequote all
swerni said:
ModernAndy said:
swerni said:
hang on, your opening words

" Following on from my last thread about having to lose the family home if my mother has to go into care for an extended period, I want to discuss the other options.

My mother, who is quite healthy at the moment, would like to leave me her house.

If she ends up going into care, the local authority will take the value out of her house to pay for her care.

Her choice would be to take a one way trip to a Swiss clinic and leave her asset to me."


Everything you've said is about you keeping hold of mummies house either via fraud or knocking her off.
In fairness to the OP, I think they have poorly worded the initial post rather than anything else. That's why I said earlier that a few of us were taking the piss just based on the grammar of the question and that I doubt most of us actually believe the house is the only issue.
Did you read the other thread?
I did and while it would seem the house is a significant factor by its mention (and hence I think it's perfectly okay to have a bit of a laugh at the OP's expense), I wouldn't assume all of the OP's (or their mother's) opinions on the issue of assisted suicide revolve around a slightly above UK average valued house.

TwigtheWonderkid

43,351 posts

150 months

Friday 27th November 2015
quotequote all
Jasandjules said:
Well, actually, this could be a reason to ensure that the state doesn't nick assets "to protect the vulnerable"....

Problem solved.
Nobody is nicking anything. The state are refusing to providing something free to someone who can afford to buy it. That doesn't seem that wrong to me.

Devil2575

13,400 posts

188 months

Friday 27th November 2015
quotequote all
TwigtheWonderkid said:
Jasandjules said:
Well, actually, this could be a reason to ensure that the state doesn't nick assets "to protect the vulnerable"....

Problem solved.
Nobody is nicking anything. The state are refusing to providing something free to someone who can afford to buy it. That doesn't seem that wrong to me.
Indeed.


aw51 121565

4,771 posts

233 months

Saturday 28th November 2015
quotequote all
Bringing this vaguely back on topic: the OP seems to be seeking an illness for his mother which is acute - needing carers quite a few times a day - and which will be funded by the NHS while she remains at home needing care? NHS-funded means it isn't means-tested wink(& cloud9 ) .

As another poster on here commented a few years back, such NHS-care-funded clients are "basket cases". My late wife Helen was one such... But the 2 carers 4 times a day cost us NOWT for several months scratchchin . Anonymous people turning up in pairs to wipe her arse (and wash everywhere else) on a regular basis - turning her left and right on an NHS-supplied adjustable bed - and removing an NHS-supplied Adult Nappy at the start and fitting another one a few minutes later after wiping and washing each visit...

Actually, no - we got super-absorbent Adult Nappies from a local supplier (at our own cost) and had the carers apply them every night in anticipation of the extra "flow" during the night... Didn't always work, but there you go! Imagine buying nappies for your wife?? nuts

Helen was tetraplegic, bed-bound, had a feeding tube into her stomach (with a feeding machine to suit which I controlled) because she couldn't swallow, couldn't speak (we communicated using closed questions "eyes up for yes, eyes down for no" stuff & latterly via an eTran Frame), it went on...

I managed 18 months of this journey, half of it at home and the other half in a local hospital (but not half-and-half/end-of, rather more random with most of the time in hospital time at the start and rather less at the end) until she passed on. I was Helen's carer 24/7 at home, we had a "baby alarm" so I could be on-call when I went to bed (hopefully to sleep) at night... Carrying out mouth/throat-suction at 4AM is for winners... *snore*

Been widowed 17-and-a-bit-months now - I was first widowed in Feb 2003 (Helen's passing was the second time frown ). I am pretty jaded generally, but threads like this mix my metaphors wink ...

Not sure where this is going hehe - but the OP needs to get a serious grip, in conjuction with stepping outside to have a serious word with him/herself?

silly

Durzel

12,265 posts

168 months

Saturday 28th November 2015
quotequote all
johnxjsc1985 said:
Same here and I would sell everything I own to have her back.
+1 for my Dad (passed just over 2 years ago now). Wouldn't even need a moment to consider it.

Vizsla

923 posts

124 months

Saturday 28th November 2015
quotequote all
TwigtheWonderkid said:
Jasandjules said:
Well, actually, this could be a reason to ensure that the state doesn't nick assets "to protect the vulnerable"....

Problem solved.
Nobody is nicking anything. The state are refusing to providing something free to someone who can afford to buy it. That doesn't seem that wrong to me.
Agree 100%, but you'll never convince the 'I paid my taxes/NI' contingent. The spirit of feudalism lives on in many people, obsessed with leaving their 'inheritance' that they 'slogged their guts out' for. Yawn.

All the more difficult to understand as for many of the people I know who have this attitude, a significant proportion of their 'wealth' is the huge tax-free 'profit' that they made on their house. The very same people who used to glibly brag that 'my house is earning more than I do', and now whinge that they are 'being taxed twice'. Don't think so.

Interestingly, many of the super rich are not obsessed about inheritance and leave their offspring very little to make their own way in life.

lee_fr200

5,477 posts

190 months

Saturday 28th November 2015
quotequote all
Me personally I'd rather sell the house and put the money into her care

How can anyone be that money or asset orientated to bump off a parent either assisted or whatever

If your mother is vulnerable then you need to protect her from herself not agree for her to go and kill herself


I'd much rather have my parents than bricks n mortar

johnxjsc1985

15,948 posts

164 months

Saturday 28th November 2015
quotequote all
lee_fr200 said:
Me personally I'd rather sell the house and put the money into her care

How can anyone be that money or asset orientated to bump off a parent either assisted or whatever

If your mother is vulnerable then you need to protect her from herself not agree for her to go and kill herself


I'd much rather have my parents than bricks n mortar
Its hard to believe that some people need that explaining. These people are the only reason we exist.

TwigtheWonderkid

43,351 posts

150 months

Saturday 28th November 2015
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
You may be right, but until you are languishing in a care home leaking from every orifice, you can't know for sure.

johnxjsc1985

15,948 posts

164 months

Saturday 28th November 2015
quotequote all
I think some people underestimate the human desire to live. My old mate who is now 86 led an incredibly active life until about 18 months ago on boxing day he had a fall and after hospital has spent the last 6 months in a bed in a care home. He is on a catheter and needs a adult diaper but he doesn't want to go just yet and enjoys the visits he has. His wife died suddenly just two months ago yet he has shown no self pity and tries very hard to be optimistic and talks about getting out and coming home.

Shuvi McTupya

Original Poster:

24,460 posts

247 months

Saturday 28th November 2015
quotequote all
lee_fr200 said:
Me personally I'd rather sell the house and put the money into her care

How can anyone be that money or asset orientated to bump off a parent either assisted or whatever

If your mother is vulnerable then you need to protect her from herself not agree for her to go and kill herself


I'd much rather have my parents than bricks n mortar
But, she doesn't want to go into care..so you are suggesting I sell the house to force her to go into a care home against her wishes.

And she is not vulnerable, she is perfectly healthy and of sound mind..she recently had a little health scare though and it made her start thinking about wills/ power of attorney etc. she booked an appointment to go see a solicitor but he was a little vague so I thought I would ask on here..big mistake smile

And to answer other people's question, I don't Still live at home but I recently sold my house and moved up to Scotland for work, seeing as she already lived up here it made sense to pool our resources. I pay a reasonable rent so she is able to have a higher quality of life, and I don't have to go shopping smile

Shuvi McTupya

Original Poster:

24,460 posts

247 months

Saturday 28th November 2015
quotequote all
Assisted suicide would be her preference, and that is what this thread was supposed to be about, the other thread was about the actual options that are available which ( when the time comes) is for me to become a full time carer or for her to into care, against her wishes...

It is a lose lose situation, she loses her house and her independence, and my siblings and I lose the inheritance she would like to pass down to us, and we would like her to pass down to us, obviously..




TooMany2cvs

29,008 posts

126 months

Saturday 28th November 2015
quotequote all
Shuvi McTupya said:
But, she doesn't want to go into care..so you are suggesting I sell the house to force her to go into a care home against her wishes.
Nobody WANTS to go into a care home... The question is whether she is able to still live at home - and a large part of that is what support and care she can get at home.

Shuvi McTupya said:
And to answer other people's question, I don't Still live at home but I recently sold my house and moved up to Scotland for work, seeing as she already lived up here it made sense to pool our resources. I pay a reasonable rent so she is able to have a higher quality of life, and I don't have to go shopping smile
So you don't live with your mother, you just... live with your mother. Who does all your shopping for you.

anonymous-user

54 months

Saturday 28th November 2015
quotequote all
How do you know she will need long term full time care?

Loads of people don't need that.

Either by dying early or being well until relatively close to their death.

Shuvi McTupya

Original Poster:

24,460 posts

247 months

Saturday 28th November 2015
quotequote all
TooMany2cvs said:
Shuvi McTupya said:
But, she doesn't want to go into care..so you are suggesting I sell the house to force her to go into a care home against her wishes.
Nobody WANTS to go into a care home... The question is whether she is able to still live at home - and a large part of that is what support and care she can get at home.

Shuvi McTupya said:
And to answer other people's question, I don't Still live at home but I recently sold my house and moved up to Scotland for work, seeing as she already lived up here it made sense to pool our resources. I pay a reasonable rent so she is able to have a higher quality of life, and I don't have to go shopping smile
So you don't live with your mother, you just... live with your mother. Who does all your shopping for you.
What I clearly mean is that I haven't lived with her for my adult life, and yes I give her money and she does the shopping , you have an issue with that? She likes shopping, I don't.



Shuvi McTupya

Original Poster:

24,460 posts

247 months

Saturday 28th November 2015
quotequote all
desolate said:
How do you know she will need long term full time care?

Loads of people don't need that.

Either by dying early or being well until relatively close to their death.
We both hope you are right! Just trying to figure out what options are available really.

Plan for the worst but hope for the best and all that..