Police officer texting whilst driving

Police officer texting whilst driving

Author
Discussion

MG Ant

98 posts

124 months

Wednesday 2nd December 2015
quotequote all
BertBert said:
I don't read it like that and it doesn't make sense to me to be so. I think it means interactive comms fn includes a, b, c and d.
IANAL
Bert
TETRA is similar to GSM (std mobile phone with 2.5G), but for the police, fire brigade, ... The main difference is that it allows push-to-talk and one-to-many calls.

Mk3Spitfire

2,921 posts

129 months

Wednesday 2nd December 2015
quotequote all
Just to clarify, and for the information of the few who are genuinely interested, as explained above, tetra is the name given to the pocket radio sets most firces currently use. When dispatched to a call, details are sent through to the set, so callers name, address and phone number are sent through so you can check details. It's not intended that the driver starts reading this when it comes through.
I thought I made it quite obvious, but I forgot where I was writing for a second...I quite clearly am not condoning the police using mobile phones, or driving carelessly. Read what I posted again. I simply mentioned that from the footage it isn't totally clear what the driver is doing, and giving alternative explanations. I wasn't excusing anything. I should have realised I'd have to spell it out for the likes of Eclassless and the hawk, so I applogise for that, although in General I don't post for their benefit.
Cops doing stupid things, in general wind up other cops more than members of the public, because the narrow minded amongst us, many of whom appear to frequent this place, assume that all cops do the same, thus giving us a bad name.

This place is getting boring.

BertBert

19,068 posts

212 months

Wednesday 2nd December 2015
quotequote all
Just ignore the twonkish comments. What you said was perfectly sensible.
Bert

Mk3Spitfire

2,921 posts

129 months

Wednesday 2nd December 2015
quotequote all
^^
Thanks

handpaper

1,296 posts

204 months

Thursday 3rd December 2015
quotequote all
I saw something similar a couple of years ago, driving through Edgbaston. WPC, alone in the car, pulling out of the Police station car park and turning left into the right of two lanes going the opposite way to me. Driving with her left hand; right hand held low with her phone in it, texting away merrily.
Not visible to most, but to me looking down from the lorry cab, quite plain.
Considered reporting her, without evidence I couldn't see any point.

Eclassy

1,201 posts

123 months

Thursday 3rd December 2015
quotequote all
handpaper said:
I saw something similar a couple of years ago, driving through Edgbaston. WPC, alone in the car, pulling out of the Police station car park and turning left into the right of two lanes going the opposite way to me. Driving with her left hand; right hand held low with her phone in it, texting away merrily.
Not visible to most, but to me looking down from the lorry cab, quite plain.
Considered reporting her, without evidence I couldn't see any point.
It was nothing guv....

Just a 'Tetrapak' comms type tingy which makes some officers super duper multitasking drivers.

BertBert

19,068 posts

212 months

Thursday 3rd December 2015
quotequote all
Eclassy said:
It was nothing guv....

Just a 'Tetrapak' comms type tingy which makes some officers super duper multitasking drivers.
dull, dull, dull. At least say something of value. Just deliberately (or maybe not) misunderstanding a comment posted as if it were a defense and then wittering on about it doesn't add all that much value really.

anonymous-user

55 months

Thursday 3rd December 2015
quotequote all
The problem with not being that bright is it makes hiding agenda and bias a lot harder. It also detracts from the quality of the fictional anti-police stories.

Mk3Spitfire

2,921 posts

129 months

Thursday 3rd December 2015
quotequote all
Bless him, he can't help it.