POPLA appeal againts Premier Park - Success

[WinstonWolf]

Osinjak said:

TooMany2cvs said:

Osinjak said:

Why do you have to constantly ruin threads with your miserable posts?

I'm terribly sorry if a dose of reality "ruins" things for you. You must be very delicate.

The fact is that the OP's success at appeal had nothing to do with any of the grounds he actually appealed on. The ONLY reason it succeeded was because they didn't send one photo.

Would it have succeeded if they sent that photo? We just don't know. It might've, it might not've. The assessor has explicitly not made any comment.

anothernameitist said:

its upto the Parking company to supply evidence, if they can't be bothered to supply that evidence to a good standard then its a victory

^ This bit is right. It's a victory, the ticket has been quashed - but it's not a victory on any of the grounds that the OP submitted. It's entirely the parking company's cockup in not supplying evidence. Did they not supply it because they knew the sign didn't conform? Or did they simply forget that photo? We don't know.

ssray said:

I took mobile pics during the early evening showing that you could not read them without some form of lighting, the company submitted its own pics, I questioned if as they were jpeg they would stand up in court.

The one thing we DO know is that their JPGs were acceptable to the assessor - although I'd presume the OP's "mobile pics" were also JPGs...?

The mark of a smart man, attack the man and not the content, you must have huge testicles.

You're a dull and repetitive poster on this site, constantly belittling people, generally miserable and with zero generosity of spirit. Don't flatter yourself and think you ruin anything for me but your incessantly trite and immature posting style is so obvious that it's difficult to ignore. Do us all a favour and find another site would you? There's a good chap/girl.

Well summed up. Do us all a favour 2CV, find a nice short pier and take you and your misery for a long run along it.

[speedking31]

Adjudicator said:

As such, I am unable to determine if the signage complies with Section 18.3 of the BPA Code of Practice, if it provides instructions on how to register the vehicle with the hotel, or if it correctly informs motorists that terms and conditions may apply, or that a Parking Charge Notice may be issued for contravention of the associated regulations.

"... regulations ..." really?

[Vaud]

2CV. I like many of your contributions. Often they are constructive and helpful and they are the best.

Please do more of those and fewer of these, posts like this are pretty weak.

[ferrariF50lover]

TooMany2cvs said:

So the appeal was granted SOLELY on the basis of the operator not sending a photo of that sign, so it couldn't be determined whether it was compliant or not - and no comment has been made either way on any of your other claims.

Try not to get too jubilant in your victory...

In fairness, he's right.

[ssray]

PurpleMoonlight said:

Arrogant and selfish.

Way to go .....

Loon are you back from the dead?