Caught doing 113mph....pleading not guilty?
Discussion
Innowaybored said:
Are this much of a dick in real life? Does it come naturally or have you really had to work hard to achieve this level? Do you drive an audi? Are you classed as short? Did you get bullied at school? Were you bottle fed? I'm just trying to understand you being such a w
ker.
Have a word with yourself, honestly.ker. This type of post seems to get the same type of response, a torrent of criticism that does not advance the discussion. (Admitted, my comment here does not do much either). However, since there was a bit of drift, I have found the AGTLaw has been one of the most fact based,to-the-point and helpful contributors on the subject over years.
agtlaw said:
Liokault said:
Nice input. I forgot why I stopped bothering making threads, I remember now.
So what is correct in law?
56+ day ban means your licence is revoked. No retest. Just complete a form. From memory, Form D1.So what is correct in law?
berlintaxi said:
cmaguire said:
I appreciate that he is a valuable contributor to this forum on the whole, and in the short time I have been here it is apparent that they are a species in decline, but still stand by my first post.
What a surprise, I am sure their decline is not in any way related to the number of arsey dicks who have signed up over the last couple of years.
Unfortunately they are breeding faster than the population limitation programme can cope with... 
Liokault said:
agtlaw said:
Liokault said:
Nice input. I forgot why I stopped bothering making threads, I remember now.
So what is correct in law?
56+ day ban means your licence is revoked. No retest. Just complete a form. From memory, Form D1.So what is correct in law?
)
Ali Chappussy said:
Liokault said:
The office we're sitting in is about 270 miles from his house, so his ability to drive is important to him.
If his licence means so much to him, why was he doing 113mph in the first place? Sorry, I have no sympathy for him, hope he gets a long ban and a huge fine.Before you flame me, I know someone who was killed by a speeding motorist doing well in excess of 110mph.
Up date for the sake of closure:
Previous court date was just to put a plea in....in this case not guilty.
Adjourned till this week where he got 6 points on his license and a £550 fine. Quite a result as he was fully expecting a ban.
He was into £2k+ with his lawyer in the summer, not sure what his final bill is.
Previous court date was just to put a plea in....in this case not guilty.
Adjourned till this week where he got 6 points on his license and a £550 fine. Quite a result as he was fully expecting a ban.
He was into £2k+ with his lawyer in the summer, not sure what his final bill is.
Liokault said:
Up date for the sake of closure:
Previous court date was just to put a plea in....in this case not guilty.
Adjourned till this week where he got 6 points on his license and a £550 fine. Quite a result as he was fully expecting a ban.
He was into £2k+ with his lawyer in the summer, not sure what his final bill is.
I'm assuming he was therefore found guilty of the lesser charge of exceeding 70mph?Previous court date was just to put a plea in....in this case not guilty.
Adjourned till this week where he got 6 points on his license and a £550 fine. Quite a result as he was fully expecting a ban.
He was into £2k+ with his lawyer in the summer, not sure what his final bill is.
Edited by Mike_Mac on Sunday 30th October 10:30
Greg66 said:
Used your amazing powers of hindsight even more effectively?
Meh! The NG plea seemed a bit strange considering what he got, then I realised he was going for the 70+, which was a bit different. Shoot me!Main (pertinent) question is how they accepted 70+ vs 113mph though? Did the court accept the speedo wasn't sufficient evidence?
Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff