m40: police transit van with speed camera parked on bridge

m40: police transit van with speed camera parked on bridge

Author
Discussion

Usget

5,426 posts

212 months

Friday 29th April 2016
quotequote all
On the bridge northbound before the Oxford turnoff again today. I wasn't 100% concentrating and may have gone through at somewhere between 75 and 80 - hopefully should be OK though.

INWB

896 posts

108 months

Friday 29th April 2016
quotequote all
Usget said:
On the bridge northbound before the Oxford turnoff again today. I wasn't 100% concentrating and may have gone through at somewhere between 75 and 80 - hopefully should be OK though.
As the M40 seems to have an average speed of around 90mph (and depending on road conditions perfectly safely I may add) I can't seeing that being a problem. If they caught everyone doing say 75-85mph they would be raking it in.

jurbie

2,345 posts

202 months

Friday 29th April 2016
quotequote all
This is a common one.

https://goo.gl/maps/ggmfS1Um8g42

Parks above the northbound carriageway but is covering the southbound.

I know these things can nick you from half a mile away or something but I'm actually pretty convinced they wait until you are virtually on top of them. I know many will disagree but the amount of times I've spotted a van parked up in the distance and have seen other drivers sail past me before standing on the anchors 200 hundred yards before the van suggests to me they really don't need to target vehicles half a mile away. It seems like it's less a punishment for speeding and more about observation.

colin_p

4,503 posts

213 months

Friday 29th April 2016
quotequote all
At the London end I've seen them parked up on bridges bewteen the M25 and Junction 4 (High Wycombe / Handy Cross).

Sam.F

1,144 posts

201 months

Saturday 30th April 2016
quotequote all
Last time we went along the M40 there was one at Beaconsfield *and* another in the Banbury area. I'm sure I'd have been caught by the second one in normal circumstances but fortunately on this occasion I had a roof box on the car and travelling above about 75mph with that just uses too much fuel!

They are sneaky down there a bit like our local ones in Cumbria in that they (a) operate in areas with no signs and (b) often like to park all the way over to the right of bridges that are on/after right hand curves in order to stay out of sight for as long as possible.

Carl_Manchester

Original Poster:

12,258 posts

263 months

Sunday 1st May 2016
quotequote all
my ticket came through yesterday so I will go through the process and see how it goes. ticket says between junction 7 and 8

Carl_Manchester

Original Poster:

12,258 posts

263 months

Tuesday 20th September 2016
quotequote all

follow-up: 5 points and £700 fine.

amancalledrob

1,248 posts

135 months

Tuesday 20th September 2016
quotequote all
Carl_Manchester said:
follow-up: 5 points and £700 fine.
Ouch

pim

2,344 posts

125 months

Tuesday 20th September 2016
quotequote all
1Addicted said:
To avoid unnecessary clenching, the bottom line (pardon the pun), watch the road ahead and not the car in front.

I was following a little way behind, a line of cars on a local motorway who were all driving safely but above the limit, and if not a little too close to each other. I saw ahead at the brow of a hill where there happens to be a bridge over the other side, their brake lights come on in a hurry. To my mind it was either some idiot pulling off a silly stunt, or a speed trap so I took caution, and as I rounded the top of the hill there was a filthy little scoundrel perched on the bridge, in his "safety camera" van, aiming a camera down the road at me.
The van what flashed my car was also filthy.Must be a new tactic by these scrounchers if that is the right spelling.I thought it was a mucky builders van.Must be a new tactic.Never mind,was invited on the course and 100 quid lighter.Waste of time.

FurtiveFreddy

8,577 posts

238 months

Tuesday 20th September 2016
quotequote all
Carl_Manchester said:
follow-up: 5 points and £700 fine.
Speed?

Dr Doofenshmirtz

15,270 posts

201 months

Tuesday 20th September 2016
quotequote all
I'm going to guess around 105?

Don't tell us yet - virtual prize for the nearest guess smile

FurtiveFreddy

8,577 posts

238 months

Tuesday 20th September 2016
quotequote all
98?

Carl_Manchester

Original Poster:

12,258 posts

263 months

Tuesday 20th September 2016
quotequote all
FurtiveFreddy said:
98?
yes

FurtiveFreddy

8,577 posts

238 months

Tuesday 20th September 2016
quotequote all
wink

BTW, for future reference and despite what anyone says about them, a good laser detector will alert you with enough time to slow down a bit (or sometimes a lot), especially where they hide on bridges and are serially pinging all cars approaching them, as there's often enough light scatter from the car in front of you to trigger the alarm.

Not so useful if you're the only car on the road at the time, or if the camera van is hiding around a bend, but my Valentine One has saved me in these situations more than once. The double bridge tactic is one they seem to use whenever they can. M40 near Oxford and M3/A303 junction are two popular ones.



Edited by FurtiveFreddy on Tuesday 20th September 17:44

Davidonly

1,080 posts

194 months

Tuesday 20th September 2016
quotequote all
FurtiveFreddy said:
;)

BTW, for future reference and despite what anyone says about them, a good laser detector will alert you with enough time to slow down a bit (or sometimes a lot), especially where they hide on bridges and are serially pinging all cars approaching them, as there's often enough light scatter from the car in front of you to trigger the alarm.

Not so useful if you're the only car on the road at the time, or if the camera van is hiding around a bend, but my Valentine One has saved me in these situations more than once. The double bridge tactic is one they seem to use whenever they can. M40 near Oxford and M3/A303 junction are two popular ones.



Edited by FurtiveFreddy on Tuesday 20th September 17:44
Yup here too: Scatter and having to double dip (maybe an error on first ping) has alerted me in a helpful way with laser detectors x 3 in about 10 years

OldGermanHeaps

3,843 posts

179 months

Tuesday 20th September 2016
quotequote all
Are the laser jammers reliable?

Dr Doofenshmirtz

15,270 posts

201 months

Tuesday 20th September 2016
quotequote all
Carl_Manchester said:
FurtiveFreddy said:
98?
yes
That's pretty harsh.
Bad luck.

Heaveho

5,336 posts

175 months

Tuesday 20th September 2016
quotequote all
Were you in one of the Porsches op? Bad omen for me if so, I'll be through there tomorrow in mine for the first time since purchase.........never seen them there or at the aforementioned M3/A303 junction in 6 years of regular to-ing and fro-ing past both of those locations.

Carl_Manchester

Original Poster:

12,258 posts

263 months

Wednesday 21st September 2016
quotequote all
I was driving a Porsche turbo

FurtiveFreddy

8,577 posts

238 months

Wednesday 21st September 2016
quotequote all
OldGermanHeaps said:
Are the laser jammers reliable?
I was talking about detectors, not jammers. Both are reliable if you buy good ones.

I used jammers for a few years but stopped bothering after a Friday night knock on the door by two gentlemen who hauled my other half down the station for a 'chat' after she borrowed my car one day and jammed a local speed trap.

The Valentine One is about the best radar/laser detector you can buy but there are a lot more false alarms these days due to laser/radar-based driver aids fitted on new cars.