Police too busy!

Author
Discussion

singlecoil

33,690 posts

247 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
Countdown said:
La Liga said:
hich would again been an inaccurate generalisation since no one denied failings when they occur. 'Police are amazing' is another broad-brush comment. You don't have much beyond binary thinking, do you?
"binary" may be giving too much credit I think... hehe
laugh

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
Countdown said:
"binary" may be giving too much credit I think... hehe
No no, I quite agree. When I have a positive experience, my thinking will alter. While I continue to come across ineptitude, like I did the other night, my thinking will remain "binary"

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
bmw535i said:
La Liga said:
hich would again been an inaccurate generalisation since no one denied failings when they occur. 'Police are amazing' is another broad-brush comment. You don't have much beyond binary thinking, do you?
They have
Where?

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
I've already asked you to show me where you agreed that some police were rubbish and you couldn't

Dibble

12,938 posts

241 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
bmw535i said:
I've already asked you to show me where you agreed that some police were rubbish and you couldn't
Conversely, has he said no police ever were rubbish?

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
Dibble said:
Conversely, has he said no police ever were rubbish?
The premise of his posts lead me to believe that's what he thinks

Greendubber

13,222 posts

204 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
bmw535i said:
The premise of his posts lead me to believe that's what he thinks
So no then.....

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
bmw535i said:
I've already asked you to show me where you agreed that some police were rubbish and you couldn't
So no then......

Greendubber

13,222 posts

204 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
bmw535i said:
So no then......
Good grief


anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
Greendubber said:
So no then.....
Good grief

Greendubber

13,222 posts

204 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
bmw535i said:
Good grief
Hilarious, no really.


anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
Greendubber said:
Hilarious, no really.
scratchchin

RobinOakapple

2,802 posts

113 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
Greendubber said:
bmw535i said:
Good grief
Hilarious, no really.
Forget it, you're wasting your time with this joker

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
RobinOakapple said:
Forget it, you're wasting your time with this joker
Why so rude? I think I've asked a fairly reasonable question. If other posters keep answering for him.......

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
bmw535i said:
I've already asked you to show me where you agreed that some police were rubbish and you couldn't
The old 'answer a question with a question' distraction technique because you can't answer the question addressed at you. More cunning from SP&L's newest mastermind.

For me to say I don't dismiss incompetent police offices means I have to agree they exist - probably bit to subtle-a-conclusion to draw:

bmw535i page 27 said:
I know, but you and others continue to dismiss them despite the incompetence.
La Liga page 27 said:
I never dismiss incompetent officers of ('of' meant to be 'or') incompetent work.
bmw535i said:
Dibble said:
Conversely, has he said no police ever were rubbish?
The premise of his posts lead me to believe that's what he thinks
The premise of my posts are around factual matters and evidence to draw conclusions.

Given that, you should draw a different inference, not the one you want to draw.

La Liga said:
bmw535i said:
La Liga said:
Which would again been an inaccurate generalisation since no one denied failings when they occur. 'Police are amazing' is another broad-brush comment. You don't have much beyond binary thinking, do you?
They have
Where?
As above.



anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
I've answered every question you've asked me. So you do agree that there are incompetent officers. A start I suppose.

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
No you haven't. Here's one:

La Liga said:
bmw535i said:
It's just people's opinions based on their experience isn't it. smile Some say the training is bad (fact). Some say it's excellent. Who is right?

Perhaps you can see that there isn't really a right or wrong answer. Some people simply refuse to accept there are poorly trained and incompetent officers and others freely concede that there are. I know who appears the most sensible.
Which people? A speculative group you can take an adversarial position against? Why not from the other side?


anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
La Liga said:
No you haven't. Here's one:

La Liga said:
bmw535i said:
It's just people's opinions based on their experience isn't it. smile Some say the training is bad (fact). Some say it's excellent. Who is right?

Perhaps you can see that there isn't really a right or wrong answer. Some people simply refuse to accept there are poorly trained and incompetent officers and others freely concede that there are. I know who appears the most sensible.
Which people? A speculative group you can take an adversarial position against? Why not from the other side?
Do you really not know? Look at some of the other posters on here - I think they fit into that category.

Are you offended by my comments in this thread?

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
bmw535i said:
Do you really not know? Look at some of the other posters on here - I think they fit into that category.
Answering a question with a question once more combined with an 'Emperor's new clothes' approach. It's rather obvious.

Cutting through that, no one specific with no specific quotes, then. I thought that'd be the case.

You'd need to have quite a compelling basis to state that people 'refuse to accept', although I doubt that such a basis matters to you.

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
La Liga said:
uestion with a question once more. It's rather transparent technique.

Cutting through that, no one specific, then. I thought that'd be the case.

You'd also need to have quite a compelling basis to state that people 'refuse to accept', although I doubt that such a basis matters to you.
Have my comments in this thread caused you any offence?