Police too busy!
Discussion
bmw535i said:
I've already asked you to show me where you agreed that some police were rubbish and you couldn't
The old 'answer a question with a question' distraction technique because you can't answer the question addressed at you. More cunning from SP&L's newest mastermind. For me to say I don't dismiss incompetent police offices means I have to agree they exist - probably bit to subtle-a-conclusion to draw:
bmw535i page 27 said:
I know, but you and others continue to dismiss them despite the incompetence.
La Liga page 27 said:
I never dismiss incompetent officers of ('of' meant to be 'or') incompetent work.
bmw535i said:
Dibble said:
Conversely, has he said no police ever were rubbish?
The premise of his posts lead me to believe that's what he thinksGiven that, you should draw a different inference, not the one you want to draw.
La Liga said:
bmw535i said:
La Liga said:
Which would again been an inaccurate generalisation since no one denied failings when they occur. 'Police are amazing' is another broad-brush comment. You don't have much beyond binary thinking, do you?
They haveNo you haven't. Here's one:
La Liga said:
bmw535i said:
It's just people's opinions based on their experience isn't it. Some say the training is bad (fact). Some say it's excellent. Who is right?
Perhaps you can see that there isn't really a right or wrong answer. Some people simply refuse to accept there are poorly trained and incompetent officers and others freely concede that there are. I know who appears the most sensible.
Which people? A speculative group you can take an adversarial position against? Why not from the other side?Perhaps you can see that there isn't really a right or wrong answer. Some people simply refuse to accept there are poorly trained and incompetent officers and others freely concede that there are. I know who appears the most sensible.
La Liga said:
No you haven't. Here's one:
Do you really not know? Look at some of the other posters on here - I think they fit into that category. La Liga said:
bmw535i said:
It's just people's opinions based on their experience isn't it. Some say the training is bad (fact). Some say it's excellent. Who is right?
Perhaps you can see that there isn't really a right or wrong answer. Some people simply refuse to accept there are poorly trained and incompetent officers and others freely concede that there are. I know who appears the most sensible.
Which people? A speculative group you can take an adversarial position against? Why not from the other side?Perhaps you can see that there isn't really a right or wrong answer. Some people simply refuse to accept there are poorly trained and incompetent officers and others freely concede that there are. I know who appears the most sensible.
Are you offended by my comments in this thread?
bmw535i said:
Do you really not know? Look at some of the other posters on here - I think they fit into that category.
Answering a question with a question once more combined with an 'Emperor's new clothes' approach. It's rather obvious.Cutting through that, no one specific with no specific quotes, then. I thought that'd be the case.
You'd need to have quite a compelling basis to state that people 'refuse to accept', although I doubt that such a basis matters to you.
La Liga said:
uestion with a question once more. It's rather transparent technique.
Cutting through that, no one specific, then. I thought that'd be the case.
You'd also need to have quite a compelling basis to state that people 'refuse to accept', although I doubt that such a basis matters to you.
Have my comments in this thread caused you any offence?Cutting through that, no one specific, then. I thought that'd be the case.
You'd also need to have quite a compelling basis to state that people 'refuse to accept', although I doubt that such a basis matters to you.
Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff