Police too busy!
Discussion
La Liga said:
nswering a question with a question once more combined with an 'Emperor's new clothes' approach. It's rather obvious.
Cutting through that, no one specific with no specific quotes, then. I thought that'd be the case.
You'd need to have quite a compelling basis to state that people 'refuse to accept', although I doubt that such a basis matters to you.
It's difficult to respond properly when your posts keep changing like the weather. I'll have to remember to quote you every time. You seem to be trying a bit too hard really.Cutting through that, no one specific with no specific quotes, then. I thought that'd be the case.
You'd need to have quite a compelling basis to state that people 'refuse to accept', although I doubt that such a basis matters to you.
Have my previous posts offended you in some way?
bmw535i said:
It's difficult to respond properly when your posts keep changing like the weather. I'll have to remember to quote you every time. You seem to be trying a bit too hard really.
You can't answer the questions so ignore them. It's probably because I ask you ones about statements which I know you have little to no basis to make. You probably (at least half) recognise this, so ask questions in replacements of answers and dodge by asking things like, "Do you really not know?"That's the problem with you make things up or present positions which haven't been represented, they stick out to the critical reader.
bmw535i said:
Have my previous posts offended you in some way?
Another distraction question with an obvious answer. bmw535i said:
I've answered all your questions.
That's not true. This one again: La Liga said:
No you haven't. Here's one:
Unless you count, "Don't you know?" as a valid answer. Which it isn't, because it's asking for specifics. La Liga said:
bmw535i said:
It's just people's opinions based on their experience isn't it. 
Some say the training is bad (fact). Some say it's excellent. Who is right?
Perhaps you can see that there isn't really a right or wrong answer. Some people simply refuse to accept there are poorly trained and incompetent officers and others freely concede that there are. I know who appears the most sensible.
Which people? A speculative group you can take an adversarial position against? Why not from the other side? Some say the training is bad (fact). Some say it's excellent. Who is right? Perhaps you can see that there isn't really a right or wrong answer. Some people simply refuse to accept there are poorly trained and incompetent officers and others freely concede that there are. I know who appears the most sensible.
So again, which people on this thread 'refuse to accept', and what specific thing/s have they said to be able to draw that conclusion?
bmw535i said:
Are you offended by my comments in this thread?
It appears you are. If so why?
If not, why such a vociferous response?
What are you aiming to do by perpetuating more negative feedback?
Further distraction questions. Vociferous? You've been the one name-calling in a child-like way. It appears you are. If so why?
If not, why such a vociferous response?
What are you aiming to do by perpetuating more negative feedback?
I noticed this little game earlier that a police force has put on their site. I think I'm quite good at it.
https://www.west-midlands.police.uk/contact-us/res...
I answered all calls with "it's a civil matter"
I think I've won
https://www.west-midlands.police.uk/contact-us/res...
I answered all calls with "it's a civil matter"
I think I've won
bmw535i said:
You.
Have I? Where?
Have I? Where?
bmw535i said:
Well yes I did do that, but not in this thread. You're referring to the thread that you made a knob of yourself in and then requested it was shut down when you were mocked.
bmw535i said:
Why don't you start a thread about the army? Not sure why so many have commented on the army really. As Walm said, you're morons for doing so
bmw535i said:
I'm going to have to retract my earlier statement and say, Walm, you're right, they are morons
If you look back, you'll see I was merely repeating other people's insults already thrown at said "victims" (some from other threads)
I can see you're angry about the whole situation, I can sense your frustration. You won't alter my perspective though if that's what you're trying to do.
What exactly is your intention? It just seems your determined to score points for some reason
(some from other threads)I can see you're angry about the whole situation, I can sense your frustration. You won't alter my perspective though if that's what you're trying to do.
What exactly is your intention? It just seems your determined to score points for some reason
bmw535i said:
If you look back, you'll see I was merely repeating other people's insults already thrown at said "victims" (some from other threads)
Yes, because writing, "You're morons for doing so", isn't name-calling, is it? (some from other threads)bmw535i said:
I can see you're angry about the whole situation, I can sense your frustration. You won't alter my perspective though if that's what you're trying to do.
More smoke and mirrors. bmw535i said:
What exactly is your intention? It just seems your determined to score points for some reason
Merely highlight a few of the many mistakes and errors you've made as many others have done so. You're the typical over-opinionated person who is happy to throw about statements as if they were facts, but when there's counter-evidence or you are challenged to back them up, you shy away because you have no substance. Another question you dodged:
La Liga said:
bmw535i said:
Just saying. When people keep bleating on about how all their problems are caused by low numbers, you'd think they would cling to every last one harder than a Scotsman grips a fiver.
Who is claiming 'all their problems are caused by low numbers?'La Liga said:
erely highlight a few of the many mistakes and errors you've made as many others have done so. You're the typical over-opinionated person who is happy to throw about statements as if they were facts, but when there's counter-evidence or you are challenged to back them up, you shy away because you have no substance.
Hmmmm errors and mistakes 
I am happy to share my experiences and voice my opinion. If that makes me overly opinionated, well that's too bad I guess.
Who is to blame for this?
Are the police directly responsible for recruitment?
http://asianlite.com/uk-police-let-down-ethnic-com...
Are the police directly responsible for recruitment?
http://asianlite.com/uk-police-let-down-ethnic-com...
La Liga said:
Another question you dodged:
La Liga said:
bmw535i said:
Just saying. When people keep bleating on about how all their problems are caused by low numbers, you'd think they would cling to every last one harder than a Scotsman grips a fiver.
Who is claiming 'all their problems are caused by low numbers?'I thought you'd read the thread yourself and would be able to see yourself. Too slow? Ok, no worries....
Go and read the first two pages. Every defensive response is all about lack of resources, MPs, government cuts etc. Not one single person actually admitting that there might just be some useless officers out there.
But let's move on. I know you think I'm overly opinionated, that's fine. Sadly, your responses have only exacerbated that which I'm sure wasn't the effect you had in mind. i suppose the constant, daily negative news stories don't help, but that isn't down to me.
bmw535i said:
Go and read the first two pages. Every defensive response is all about lack of resources, MPs, government cuts etc. Not one single person actually admitting that there might just be some useless officers out there.
Who said all problems are caused by low numbers? La Liga said:
bmw535i said:
Perhaps you can see that there isn't really a right or wrong answer. Some people simply refuse to accept there are poorly trained and incompetent officers and others freely concede that there are. I know who appears the most sensible.
Which people? A speculative group you can take an adversarial position against? Why not from the other side?La Liga said:
bmw535i said:
Go and read the first two pages. Every defensive response is all about lack of resources, MPs, government cuts etc. Not one single person actually admitting that there might just be some useless officers out there.
Who said all problems are caused by low numbers? La Liga said:
bmw535i said:
Perhaps you can see that there isn't really a right or wrong answer. Some people simply refuse to accept there are poorly trained and incompetent officers and others freely concede that there are. I know who appears the most sensible.
Which people? A speculative group you can take an adversarial position against? Why not from the other side?Not true. Perhaps take the time to digest this earlier exchange:
La Liga said:
For me to say I don't dismiss incompetent police offices means I have to agree they exist - probably bit to subtle-a-conclusion to draw:
Who said all problems are caused by low numbers? bmw535i page 27 said:
I know, but you and others continue to dismiss them despite the incompetence.
La Liga page 27 said:
I never dismiss incompetent officers of ('of' meant to be 'or') incompetent work.
bmw535i said:
Hmmmm errors and mistakes
You said you didn't name-call which you clearly did. How would that not fit an 'error and mistake'? Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff