Johnny Dangerous - White van driver.
Discussion
patby said:
When you put it like that you may have a point. Apart from my observation skills LOL.
Lots of people on phones , poor lane management no indication etc. All minor transgressions but could easily escalate if they annoy the wrong person.
Lots of people on phones , poor lane management no indication etc. All minor transgressions but could easily escalate if they annoy the wrong person.
Ooh!!!, so now we are back to picking holes in cycling again are we????Its not their fault they don't have indicators, or mirrors and the roads are full of potholes.
All other unwashed road users should make allowances for them not looking or indicating!
walm said:
I can't believe I just wasted my time on someone who has written this:
Has the referendum happened yet? What was the result?GPSHead said:
Guns aren't the problem. Muslims are.
Time for Trump, and Brexit.
Time for Trump, and Brexit.
(Why did you cut out the bit of my post which referred to traitorous Westerners who would rather try to look morally better than others than acknowledge the threat posed by mass Muslim immigration? Anyway, isn't it just wonderful that the disingenuous tactics of your side don't seem to be working so well anymore? It's only going to get "worse" from here, you know...
)can't remember said:
GPSHead said:
Ah, the virtue-signalling is strong in this one as well. "Half the country are xenophobes for wanting elected representatives to be able to make all our laws!" Don't forget that we also want the economy to tank, and we advocate the street murder of anyone who disagrees with us.
There is nothing wrong with having our own democracy and sovereignty, and being able to set our own policies on security, the economy, trade and immigration in order to benefit the British people. Try doing your own research instead of just listening to the BBC, and if you can't be bothered, say because emotion and virtue-signalling matter more to you than mere facts, then with any luck you and your ilk (whatever one of those is) can't be bothered to go and vote either.
I'm looking forward to voting this evening. And though our side will lose, at least for once we've been able to unambiguously express our opposition to the kind of fashionable, vapid, narcissistic dislike of this country that you see above. Whatever happens, this isn't over, and the EU is quite rightly on borrowed time.
I bet there were angry little flecks of spit hitting the screen as you hammered the keys typing this. There is nothing wrong with having our own democracy and sovereignty, and being able to set our own policies on security, the economy, trade and immigration in order to benefit the British people. Try doing your own research instead of just listening to the BBC, and if you can't be bothered, say because emotion and virtue-signalling matter more to you than mere facts, then with any luck you and your ilk (whatever one of those is) can't be bothered to go and vote either.
I'm looking forward to voting this evening. And though our side will lose, at least for once we've been able to unambiguously express our opposition to the kind of fashionable, vapid, narcissistic dislike of this country that you see above. Whatever happens, this isn't over, and the EU is quite rightly on borrowed time.
Edited by GPSHead on Friday 1st July 21:11
Retroman said:
walm said:
I can't believe I just wasted my time on someone who has written this:
Likewise.GPSHead said:
Guns aren't the problem. Muslims are.
Time for Trump, and Brexit.
Time for Trump, and Brexit.
GPSHead said:
Queueing up to virtue-signal. Thank god a majority of the country has finally tired of this sort of empty-headed, feeble, PC nonsense. UK policy should be set for the benefit of UK citizens, and if you don't like that then perhaps you should leave (loudly and petulantly of course)?
Which EU member states is this "mass Muslim immigration" coming from? How do you feel about the UK policy needing to be c5% exclusively relevant to Muslims?
snorky782 said:
GPSHead said:
Queueing up to virtue-signal. Thank god a majority of the country has finally tired of this sort of empty-headed, feeble, PC nonsense. UK policy should be set for the benefit of UK citizens, and if you don't like that then perhaps you should leave (loudly and petulantly of course)?
Which EU member states is this "mass Muslim immigration" coming from? How do you feel about the UK policy needing to be c5% exclusively relevant to Muslims?
Fair point you've made though. I should have said that UK policy should be set for the benefit of UK citizens who don't hate the UK, who don't want it to adopt Sharia law, and who actually deserve UK citizenship. One of the most alarming things about Islam is that "British" descendants of Muslim immigrants are very often more radical than their parents, whereas with every other type of immigrant, there tends to be a move away from ancestral ways as the generations go on. Not just me who says that, Trevor Phillips does too. It doesn't have to apply to "all Muslims" for it to be a serious problem. Two thirds of British Muslims said they wouldn't report terrorist plots. Two thirds! This is not about blind hate, however much certain people would like it to be. I will not be silent about issues which I believe to be an existential threat to our way of life. And thankfully, it seems like many others are now waking up.
Of course, Turkey will join the EU, and many of the "refugees" will eventually be given EU passports, so Muslim immigration is in fact relevant to the EU debate, and is another reason why it's a godsend that we left. Now we just need a PM who won't retain freedom of movement. But at least that can be revisited further down the line if necessary.
Now, you'd better apologise to walm for engaging with me, when he and some other twit have already clearly informed you that you're not allowed to, because I'm just so terrible for disagreeing with them on an Internet forum and wanting what I feel is best for this country and our children.
GPSHead said:
It was "walm" who first brought up Muslims in this thread, by quoting (selectively) what I had said in another thread, presumably in a lame effort to "prove" to everyone that my words there meant I was also automatically wrong about everything in this thread. He seems to be very big on the whole "political debate is about showing what a good person you are, not about getting to the truth" thing, even by Remainiac standards. His cherry-picking of crime statistics earlier is comedy gold. Apparently, mass migration from a country from high crime to a country with low crime does not in fact increase crime in the latter country, if you just wish hard enough.
Fair point you've made though. I should have said that UK policy should be set for the benefit of UK citizens who don't hate the UK, who don't want it to adopt Sharia law, and who actually deserve UK citizenship. One of the most alarming things about Islam is that "British" descendants of Muslim immigrants are very often more radical than their parents, whereas with every other type of immigrant, there tends to be a move away from ancestral ways as the generations go on. Not just me who says that, Trevor Phillips does too. It doesn't have to apply to "all Muslims" for it to be a serious problem. Two thirds of British Muslims said they wouldn't report terrorist plots. Two thirds! This is not about blind hate, however much certain people would like it to be. I will not be silent about issues which I believe to be an existential threat to our way of life. And thankfully, it seems like many others are now waking up.
Of course, Turkey will join the EU, and many of the "refugees" will eventually be given EU passports, so Muslim immigration is in fact relevant to the EU debate, and is another reason why it's a godsend that we left. Now we just need a PM who won't retain freedom of movement. But at least that can be revisited further down the line if necessary.
Now, you'd better apologise to walm for engaging with me, when he and some other twit have already clearly informed you that you're not allowed to, because I'm just so terrible for disagreeing with them on an Internet forum and wanting what I feel is best for this country and our children.
That is a hugely offensive post. It's also completely wrong again. I'll pick the Turkey piece for a laugh. Have you seen anything about their entry? Have you some special insight that nobody else has, as they haven't even started a process that takes a minimum decade to complete. Fair point you've made though. I should have said that UK policy should be set for the benefit of UK citizens who don't hate the UK, who don't want it to adopt Sharia law, and who actually deserve UK citizenship. One of the most alarming things about Islam is that "British" descendants of Muslim immigrants are very often more radical than their parents, whereas with every other type of immigrant, there tends to be a move away from ancestral ways as the generations go on. Not just me who says that, Trevor Phillips does too. It doesn't have to apply to "all Muslims" for it to be a serious problem. Two thirds of British Muslims said they wouldn't report terrorist plots. Two thirds! This is not about blind hate, however much certain people would like it to be. I will not be silent about issues which I believe to be an existential threat to our way of life. And thankfully, it seems like many others are now waking up.
Of course, Turkey will join the EU, and many of the "refugees" will eventually be given EU passports, so Muslim immigration is in fact relevant to the EU debate, and is another reason why it's a godsend that we left. Now we just need a PM who won't retain freedom of movement. But at least that can be revisited further down the line if necessary.
Now, you'd better apologise to walm for engaging with me, when he and some other twit have already clearly informed you that you're not allowed to, because I'm just so terrible for disagreeing with them on an Internet forum and wanting what I feel is best for this country and our children.
I'm not going to engage around the Muslim piece, as you are quite clearly a bigot.
Edited by snorky782 on Saturday 2nd July 15:25
snorky782 said:
GPSHead said:
It was "walm" who first brought up Muslims in this thread, by quoting (selectively) what I had said in another thread, presumably in a lame effort to "prove" to everyone that my words there meant I was also automatically wrong about everything in this thread. He seems to be very big on the whole "political debate is about showing what a good person you are, not about getting to the truth" thing, even by Remainiac standards. His cherry-picking of crime statistics earlier is comedy gold. Apparently, mass migration from a country from high crime to a country with low crime does not in fact increase crime in the latter country, if you just wish hard enough.
Fair point you've made though. I should have said that UK policy should be set for the benefit of UK citizens who don't hate the UK, who don't want it to adopt Sharia law, and who actually deserve UK citizenship. One of the most alarming things about Islam is that "British" descendants of Muslim immigrants are very often more radical than their parents, whereas with every other type of immigrant, there tends to be a move away from ancestral ways as the generations go on. Not just me who says that, Trevor Phillips does too. It doesn't have to apply to "all Muslims" for it to be a serious problem. Two thirds of British Muslims said they wouldn't report terrorist plots. Two thirds! This is not about blind hate, however much certain people would like it to be. I will not be silent about issues which I believe to be an existential threat to our way of life. And thankfully, it seems like many others are now waking up.
Of course, Turkey will join the EU, and many of the "refugees" will eventually be given EU passports, so Muslim immigration is in fact relevant to the EU debate, and is another reason why it's a godsend that we left. Now we just need a PM who won't retain freedom of movement. But at least that can be revisited further down the line if necessary.
Now, you'd better apologise to walm for engaging with me, when he and some other twit have already clearly informed you that you're not allowed to, because I'm just so terrible for disagreeing with them on an Internet forum and wanting what I feel is best for this country and our children.
That is a hugely offensive post. It's also completely wrong again. I'll pick the turkey piece for a laugh. Have you seen Allan for their entry? Have you some special insight that nobody else has, as they haven't even started a process that takes a minimum decade to complete. Fair point you've made though. I should have said that UK policy should be set for the benefit of UK citizens who don't hate the UK, who don't want it to adopt Sharia law, and who actually deserve UK citizenship. One of the most alarming things about Islam is that "British" descendants of Muslim immigrants are very often more radical than their parents, whereas with every other type of immigrant, there tends to be a move away from ancestral ways as the generations go on. Not just me who says that, Trevor Phillips does too. It doesn't have to apply to "all Muslims" for it to be a serious problem. Two thirds of British Muslims said they wouldn't report terrorist plots. Two thirds! This is not about blind hate, however much certain people would like it to be. I will not be silent about issues which I believe to be an existential threat to our way of life. And thankfully, it seems like many others are now waking up.
Of course, Turkey will join the EU, and many of the "refugees" will eventually be given EU passports, so Muslim immigration is in fact relevant to the EU debate, and is another reason why it's a godsend that we left. Now we just need a PM who won't retain freedom of movement. But at least that can be revisited further down the line if necessary.
Now, you'd better apologise to walm for engaging with me, when he and some other twit have already clearly informed you that you're not allowed to, because I'm just so terrible for disagreeing with them on an Internet forum and wanting what I feel is best for this country and our children.
I'm not going to engage around the Muslim piece, as you are quite clearly a bigot.
roofer said:
Is he a bigot ? Or has he smelled the coffee ? Just asking.
If that's a serious question, then you're equally as bad. Let me make this very, very simple.
There are no Muslim nations within the EU. As such a vote to leave the EU, due to the "islamification" of the U.K. is a vote based on prejudice and bigotry.
GPSHead said:
snorky782 said:
GPSHead said:
Queueing up to virtue-signal. Thank god a majority of the country has finally tired of this sort of empty-headed, feeble, PC nonsense. UK policy should be set for the benefit of UK citizens, and if you don't like that then perhaps you should leave (loudly and petulantly of course)?
Which EU member states is this "mass Muslim immigration" coming from? How do you feel about the UK policy needing to be c5% exclusively relevant to Muslims?
Fair point you've made though. I should have said that UK policy should be set for the benefit of UK citizens who don't hate the UK, who don't want it to adopt Sharia law, and who actually deserve UK citizenship. One of the most alarming things about Islam is that "British" descendants of Muslim immigrants are very often more radical than their parents, whereas with every other type of immigrant, there tends to be a move away from ancestral ways as the generations go on. Not just me who says that, Trevor Phillips does too. It doesn't have to apply to "all Muslims" for it to be a serious problem. Two thirds of British Muslims said they wouldn't report terrorist plots. Two thirds! This is not about blind hate, however much certain people would like it to be. I will not be silent about issues which I believe to be an existential threat to our way of life. And thankfully, it seems like many others are now waking up.
Of course, Turkey will join the EU, and many of the "refugees" will eventually be given EU passports, so Muslim immigration is in fact relevant to the EU debate, and is another reason why it's a godsend that we left. Now we just need a PM who won't retain freedom of movement. But at least that can be revisited further down the line if necessary.
Now, you'd better apologise to walm for engaging with me, when he and some other twit have already clearly informed you that you're not allowed to, because I'm just so terrible for disagreeing with them on an Internet forum and wanting what I feel is best for this country and our children.
We you American? Married your sister/cousin?
Byker28i said:
Wow, just wow in so many levels of wow!
We you American? Married your sister/cousin?
We you American? Married your sister/cousin?
Well done! You've made it all the way to the bottom row! You really showed me! Now I love the idea of open borders!
But why stop there? Why not try to aim even higher? Maybe if you try to go up one whole row every year? I know it's difficult, to actually, you know, come up with counterarguments, but I just know you can do it. Perhaps, however, it would be beneficial to you if you didn't actually click "Submit" on any of your posts until you reach, say, the third row from the top, just so that no-one thinks you're a child who puts your feelings above reality and calls people names when they can't come up with anything else.
snorky782 said:
That is a hugely offensive post.
snorky782 said:
I'll pick the Turkey piece for a laugh. Have you seen anything about their entry? Have you some special insight that nobody else has, as they haven't even started a process that takes a minimum decade to complete.
So they are going to join, as I said. You just don't know when.snorky782 said:
I'm not going to engage around the Muslim piece, as you are quite clearly a bigot.
You have nothing, and you know it. History will not be kind to the likes of you, who would rather pretend to be morally better than others than acknowledge the most serious threat of our times.
Oh, and roofer, I hope you're contrite now that Snarky has said you're "as bad as me". Yet another world-beating SJW argument there.
(Sorry all, I know this is OT, but such a piss-poor post deserved to be slapped down. I won't post anymore on this thread.)
t argument is valid if it's true.GPSHead said:
snorky782 said:
That is a hugely offensive post.
snorky782 said:
I'll pick the Turkey piece for a laugh. Have you seen anything about their entry? Have you some special insight that nobody else has, as they haven't even started a process that takes a minimum decade to complete.
So they are going to join, as I said. You just don't know when.snorky782 said:
I'm not going to engage around the Muslim piece, as you are quite clearly a bigot.
You have nothing, and you know it. History will not be kind to the likes of you, who would rather pretend to be morally better than others than acknowledge the most serious threat of our times.
Oh, and roofer, I hope you're contrite now that Snarky has said you're "as bad as me". Yet another world-beating SJW argument there.
(Sorry all, I know this is OT, but such a piss-poor post deserved to be slapped down. I won't post anymore on this thread.)
1. Ad hominem
2. Contradiction
3. Name calling
Brilliant comebacks
Now let's address your final two paragraphs and the central point and refute them.
You can not predict what history will or won't be kind to. You have your views, but that doesn't make then right. However, your lack of common decency and thinly veiled bigotry belie your true views. History will be what it is, but I very much doubt that you will be named as part of it.
There is no "serious threat" there is a whipped up pitchfork wielding mob, of which you seem to be a vocal member.
Now let's deal with that. Let's see you answer this
You stated you voted out of the EU to prevent the Islamification of Britain. How do you believe that Brexit will prevent this when there are no Muslim states in the EU? I also don't accept that Turkey "will" join the EU. They may, but then again they may not and if the by do, then it is more than 10 years away at the earliest.
I bet you post again, because otherwise you will have steam coming out of your ears for days
GPSHead said:
Queueing up to virtue-signal. Thank god a majority of the country has finally tired of this sort of empty-headed, feeble, PC nonsense. UK policy should be set for the benefit of UK citizens, and if you don't like that then perhaps you should leave (loudly and petulantly of course)?
I always seem to notice that people who throw the term "PC" around willy nilly are usually unhappy because it tries to prevent them from making sweeping and bigoted statements about various minority groups.I guess you're not aware that there is a large number of people who are UK citizens and are also Muslim. Why should they leave?
Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff