Coach Company Complaint
Discussion
Monkeylegend said:
That does read as if you were indirectly implying that you could use you governor status to your advantage and his disadvantage.
No said I was a school governor. Full stop, didn't mention we use their firm!Fact is a complaint made, should be reviewed rather than jog on your not important enough, I think his attitude far more concerning than me mentioning something that may or may not be relevant.
surveyor_101 said:
No said I was a school governor. Full stop, didn't mention we use their firm!
Fact is a complaint made, should be reviewed rather than jog on your not important enough, I think his attitude far more concerning than me mentioning something that may or may not be relevant.
You are wrong in terms of correct behaviour of a governor. It has no relevance in adding weight to a complaint other than to be an implied threat.Fact is a complaint made, should be reviewed rather than jog on your not important enough, I think his attitude far more concerning than me mentioning something that may or may not be relevant.
Much like the move by your driver, you are seemingly focused other other's wrongs without being willing to accept that you or your driver are also wrong.
It's not either/or, it can be both.
Monkeylegend said:
surveyor_101 said:
The kicker for them is that i am a school parent governor and we use this at present. Since I replied with that his communications have gone strangely quiet!.
That does read as if you were indirectly implying that you could use you governor status to your advantage and his disadvantage.Edited by surveyor_101 on Friday 8th July 12:51
Vaud said:
You are wrong in terms of correct behaviour of a governor. It has no relevance in adding weight to a complaint other than to be an implied threat.
Much like the move by your driver, you are seemingly focused other other's wrongs without being willing to accept that you or your driver are also wrong.
It's not either/or, it can be both.
We may not agree, but I have explained my rational, the cam car cut the line and caused no other vehicle or road users to change direction and or speed. I use this roundabout daily and I can't remember the last time someone didn't cut their line. If you do go around the painted spot, normally it causes confusion of others and invites people to drive in whilst in circuit thinking you have made a false indication and in this case are going straight on not right.Much like the move by your driver, you are seemingly focused other other's wrongs without being willing to accept that you or your driver are also wrong.
It's not either/or, it can be both.
I drove it today and went wide, it causes confusion with locals who don't expect it. Surely less time on a roundabout is less time exposed to danger? It may be against your L test driver training but when things get more advanced, roundabouts and broken white lines can be crossed for SVS and aren't the brick walls the DSA make them out to be.
This is the site that bangs on about fast cars and then if you get caught speeding your lambasted. Here we have a complaint about a near miss with a 54 seat coach and we are arguing that how dare the camera cars owners/ or driver question anyone's near miss actions, when the cut their line when not in conflict with others. You have to be whiter than white on here or folk like you argue till the cows come home.
Safe Driving is about defensive driving and not causing others to take evasive action, not never driving over a bit of white paint incase you may want to complain about another's driving.
Edited by surveyor_101 on Monday 11th July 20:54
Edited by surveyor_101 on Monday 11th July 20:56
surveyor_101 said:
Monkeylegend said:
Should it read we use "them" at present, "this" doesn't make sense?
You tell me so you can have a moan and play the big man. 
Funny how people turn aggressive when things don't go their way
Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff