Greedy Police

[singlecoil]

Greendubber said:

La Liga said:

Those who assert should prove.

By all accounts its down to us to scrat about the internet looking for proof of his 'ramblings'

Digby is still doing his stuff I see. The way he continually insists that we should all go hunting for support for his daft claims has gone well past laughable now, and has become boring. I think the time has come for us to ignore him, if nobody bites I expect he will stop eventually.

[Digby]

singlecoil said:

Digby is still doing his stuff I see. The way he continually insists that we should all go hunting for support for his daft claims has gone well past laughable now, and has become boring.

You don't have to hunt, almost all of it is on the forums. You can ignore that or take a look. You are saying I never provide information, when I have provided a stack of information. I suppose people being fined for being legal was daft, wasn't it? Right up until a simple search showed it happens. Brush that one under the rug, too..?

And anyway, you obviously love my posts as you always reply. Clearly I am not boring to you. It's quite nice to have such a dedicated audience and as shown, an audience that has very little idea what they are talking about and who can be shown to be wrong with a single search.

Perhaps you should try not to type anything else in this boring and laughable thread if you really feel I have nothing to offer? Show me your self control, go on....really fight the urge this time!

[AW111]

singlecoil said:

Digby is still doing his stuff I see. The way he continually insists that we should all go hunting for support for his daft claims has gone well past laughable now, and has become boring. I think the time has come for us to ignore him, if nobody bites I expect he will stop eventually.

Speak for yourself.

I still find him amusing - not bored yet

[Greendubber]

Digby said:

The pub one usually comes much later, so at least things have sped along to this conclusion.

You think me going out for a drink with friends is some kind of joker?

Blimey, I'll have a pint of what you're on please

[Digby]

Seeing as smilies seem so popular, let's just remind ourselves again of what we are dealing with..

Greendubber said:

I dont recall any drivers getting done for driving within the law

At least come prepared next time. I would lay off of the drink completely if I were you.

Thanks everyone for the giggles, though.

[Greendubber]

Digby said:

Seeing as smilies seem so popular, let's just remind ourselves again of what we are dealing with..

Greendubber said:

I dont recall any drivers getting done for driving within the law

At least come prepared next time. I would lay off of the drink completely if I were you.

Thanks everyone for the giggles, though.

Clearly ignoring the bit where I said I was happy that some drivers had been incorrectly ticketed in 2001 then? You know a couple a pages ago, you even quoted my reply.

Lay off the drink, come prepared?

Oh please do grow up.

[Greendubber]

Digby said:

Oh! Could it be time to bring out yet again the corruption evidence, the doctored stats, the FOI denials, those in the industry or connected explaining it's almost all about money and targets etc, etc, etc?

Lets just remind ourselves of this, something you have point blank refused to add any substance to......

Awaits:

You should already know

or

Go and find it yourself reply

[Digby]

Straight in with the 2001 only scenario again?

I have just been reading yet another tale of number plate recognition cock ups. It involved who knows how many drivers being fined with the police admiting it happens a lot to one of the drivers who fought back. It even happend to my friend on the Dartford crossing.

Telling me you don't care about one of the most important aspects of this sorry tale and having no clue (somehow!) that innocent drivers are fined is hardly what I would call adult behaviour.

At least you have learned something, so it wasn't all for nothing.

[Digby]

Greendubber said:

Lets just remind ourselves of this, something you have point blank refused to add any substance to......

Awaits:

You should already know

or

Go and find it yourself reply

It goes back decades and includes hundreds of possible links. I also posted much of the info on these forums. You are choosing not to read it.

[Greendubber]

Digby said:

Straight in with the 2001 only scenario again?

I have just been reading yet another tale of number plate recognition cock ups. It involved who knows how many drivers being fined with the police admiting it happens a lot to one of the drivers who fought back. It even happend to my friend on the Dartford crossing.

Telling me you don't care about one of the most important aspects of this sorry tale and having no clue (somehow!) that innocent drivers are fined is hardly what I would call adult behaviour.

At least you have learned something, so it wasn't all for nothing.

It is relevant though and as I have said numerous times I am quite happy with the fact some people have been incorrectly ticketed, I'm not sure how many times I need to say that to you?

And adult behaviour? Perhaps if you supplied supporting evidence to the rest of your claims you might appear a bit more grown up.

Replying to your tedious posts is no fun, I can only suspect its even less fun for others to read.....

[Greendubber]

Digby said:

Greendubber said:

Lets just remind ourselves of this, something you have point blank refused to add any substance to......

Awaits:

You should already know

or

Go and find it yourself reply

It goes back decades and includes hundreds of possible links. I also posted much of the info on these forums. You are choosing not to read it.

Bang on schedule....

[Digby]

Greendubber said:

I am quite happy with the fact some people have been incorrectly ticketed,

I would imagine that's why you have no interest in finding out why.

Your basis for argument is that everything is perfect I assume? It's not. I'm sorry you find that hard to deal with and are resorting to the regular tactics displayed on here because you are not getting your own way.

A massive amount of information is on these forums, you just can't be bothered to read it. The mods on these froums close posts people have repeated and yet you are asking me to repeat things I have repeated dozens of times before.

If you care about anything, go read them. If you don't care, carry on as you are. It makes no difference to me.

[Greendubber]

Digby said:

If you care about anything, go read them. If you don't care, carry on as you are. It makes no difference to me.

....it clearly does.

[RobinOakapple]

Greendubber said:

Digby said:

If you care about anything, go read them. If you don't care, carry on as you are. It makes no difference to me.

....it clearly does.

Indeed, it certainly does.

The problem with people like Digby on threads like these is that they turn what could be a worthwhile discussion into a load of st.

[Digby]

Sorry you feel that way. The earlier comment about posting links was said with the smiley added on the end because these conversations only ever go one way and they have, exactly as predicted.

I have posted lots of info but get accused of not posting info.

I admit I don't hate all speed cameras but get accused of hating all cameras.

I provide information showing how corrupt some of this system can be and eventually, as shown in this thread, the responses are usually "So what?" or "I don't care" etc.

Then people get angry, start using swear words, try to belittle posts and characters..name calling etc.

I can back up everything I say, others simply go on the attack with little to no knowledge (as shown)

It really doesn't matter to me. I only post to try and educate the unenlightened and that has worked for one scenario here at least. Mr Dubber has learned something and I am happy with that.

[RobinOakapple]

Digby said:

I only post to try and educate the unenlightened...

[singlecoil]

RobinOakapple said:

Digby said:

I only post to try and educate the unenlightened...

Sad but true.

[anonymous-user]

Digby said:

Those who dislike assertions should disprove? Or does this only work one way?

Yes, it works one way. If something deviates from the established / offical / generally accepted then the person who is asserting that thing / those things needs to present the evidence.

[Greendubber]

RobinOakapple said:

Digby said:

I only post to try and educate the unenlightened...

He'd have predicted that....

Edited by Greendubber on Sunday 18th September 16:59

[pinchmeimdreamin]

Digby said:

I have just been reading yet another tale of number plate recognition cock ups. It involved who knows how many drivers being fined with the police admiting it happens a lot to one of the drivers who fought back.

Care to share the link ?