Before speed cameras.......

Before speed cameras.......

Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

54 months

Friday 14th October 2016
quotequote all
Did anyone get nicked doing 35mph in a 30? (Excluding the obvious)

Riley Blue

20,940 posts

226 months

Friday 14th October 2016
quotequote all
Closest I got was 38.

Johnnytheboy

24,498 posts

186 months

Friday 14th October 2016
quotequote all
No, but everyone died in car crashes.

768

13,645 posts

96 months

Friday 14th October 2016
quotequote all
No. So many generations of kittens lost though.

7795

1,070 posts

181 months

Friday 14th October 2016
quotequote all
The closest I got to a speeding ticket before GATSO's was a ticket on from the GATSO camera on Twickenham Bridge, A316; I think it was the UK's first GATSO camera.

MrBig

2,674 posts

129 months

Friday 14th October 2016
quotequote all
I remember the first one being installed near me. The elevens along the road caused by my 17 year old self locking all 4 wheels were there for months afterwards... laugh

Davidonly

1,080 posts

193 months

Friday 14th October 2016
quotequote all
A more telling question would be to ask about getting an invoice for 79 on a motorway? Before scamming was an olympic sport - Probably not.

When scameras were first discussed they were for deployment at ACCIDENT BLACKSPOTS - remember those? Specifically they were not to be deployed on Motorways (since they are by far the safest type of roads).

Nowadays new bypasses are built with accident blackspots designed into them and motorways are the most camera infested road type.

Also, speed-limits are lowered routinely and several convulsions of the 'business-plan' have been created (by imaginative ex-senior police-officers / LAS and technology providers) to provide an on-going and lucrative funding scheme into-which various snouts are inserted.

Oh yes and now cameras are placed 'where speeding is likely to occur' instead of where it's actually dangerous. So we have cancelled out their original 'supposed purpose' completely !


Spangles

1,441 posts

185 months

Friday 14th October 2016
quotequote all
Johnnytheboy said:
No, but everyone died in car crashes.
Deaths on the road 1990, 5217, speed cameras introduced 1991, deaths on the road 2015, 1732.

InitialDave

11,877 posts

119 months

Friday 14th October 2016
quotequote all
Spangles said:
Deaths on the road 1990, 5217, speed cameras introduced 1991, deaths on the road 2015, 1732.
Finding those numbers was the easy bit.

Now prove the cameras are what caused the reduction.

caelite

4,274 posts

112 months

Friday 14th October 2016
quotequote all
Spangles said:
Johnnytheboy said:
No, but everyone died in car crashes.
Deaths on the road 1990, 5217, speed cameras introduced 1991, deaths on the road 2015, 1732.
Completely irrelevant numbers when you factor in the increase of vehicle safety equipment and driver assists. A more relevant number would be reduction of accidents where speed could be considered a factor in areas where cameras are now implemented. Honestly dont have the source to hand but I remember reading numbers a few years ago citing that even in accident blackspots the decrease was minimal.

Edited by caelite on Saturday 15th October 02:59

768

13,645 posts

96 months

Friday 14th October 2016
quotequote all
caelite said:
Completely irrelevant numbers when you factor in the increase of vehicle safety equipment and driver assists. A more relevant number would be reduction of actions where speed could be considered a factor in areas where cameras are now implemented. Honestly dont have the source to hand but I remember reading numbers a few years ago citing that even in accident blackspots the decrease was minimal.
The statistics get more complicated than that with factors like regression to the mean. Then add in that these days they seem more keen on mobile than static cameras... anyone could be forgiven for thinking that was deliberate obfuscation.

littlebasher

3,774 posts

171 months

Friday 14th October 2016
quotequote all
Ok, this is something that still bugs me to this day.

1990 I was stopped along with 2 other cars by a local policeman armed with an early speed gun. The cars were in fact traveling faster than me, yet the policeman decided to let them off with a warning and 'deal' with me.

I was 16 and riding a restricted moped, riding UPHILL and with that in mind i was reported for 33mph in a 30 limit. The cars were passing me as i limped up the hill, yet I was the one he decided needed to be taught a lesson. My protests fell on deaf ears, 16 year old lad needed to learn road safety the hard way


Bigends

5,413 posts

128 months

Friday 14th October 2016
quotequote all
Never used to report for anything under 10mph (depending on the manner of driving as well) over the limit, either after a 3/10 mile follow or with the old K15 radar guns. We'd certainly stop and have a word but no paperwork.

darker grapefruit

360 posts

100 months

Friday 14th October 2016
quotequote all
Yes, when the car following me turned out to be plod (it was dark at the time).

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

54 months

Friday 14th October 2016
quotequote all
Bigends said:
Never used to report for anything under 10mph (depending on the manner of driving as well) over the limit, either after a 3/10 mile follow or with the old K15 radar guns. We'd certainly stop and have a word but no paperwork.
The days when common sense prevailed.

Johnnytheboy

24,498 posts

186 months

Friday 14th October 2016
quotequote all
caelite said:
Spangles said:
Johnnytheboy said:
No, but everyone died in car crashes.
Deaths on the road 1990, 5217, speed cameras introduced 1991, deaths on the road 2015, 1732.
Completely irrelevant numbers when you factor in the increase of vehicle safety equipment and driver assists. A more relevant number would be reduction of actions where speed could be considered a factor in areas where cameras are now implemented. Honestly dont have the source to hand but I remember reading numbers a few years ago citing that even in accident blackspots the decrease was minimal.
...and also the rate in reduction in KSIs flattens out remarkably about the time cameras are brought in...

roofer

5,136 posts

211 months

Friday 14th October 2016
quotequote all
Seems to be a lack of the usual protagonists here. Has Mum blocked their internet ?

jm doc

2,788 posts

232 months

Friday 14th October 2016
quotequote all
roofer said:
Seems to be a lack of the usual protagonists here. Has Mum blocked their internet ?
hard week at school for the poor dears, they'll probably be along in the morning


Edited by jm doc on Friday 14th October 23:49

kwk

562 posts

178 months

Saturday 15th October 2016
quotequote all
Bigends said:
Never used to report for anything under 10mph (depending on the manner of driving as well) over the limit, either after a 3/10 mile follow or with the old K15 radar guns. We'd certainly stop and have a word but no paperwork.
When I first went onto traffic, 1980, I was told to ignore anything under 15mph over the limit A rule everyone seemed to stick to. We had probably three times as many patrol cars then though and the roads were better patrolled.

Steve H

5,252 posts

195 months

Saturday 15th October 2016
quotequote all
Spangles said:
Johnnytheboy said:
No, but everyone died in car crashes.
Deaths on the road 1990, 5217, speed cameras introduced 1991, deaths on the road 2015, 1732.
Percentage of cars with stability control systems fitted in 1990, zero.

Percentage of cars with SRS systems fitted in 1990, almost zero.

Percentage of cars with stability control and airbags in 2015, 100%.



I got nicked by an unmarked car, pre-cameras, for doing 98-102, I'd overtaken him on my 350YPVS and it took him a while to catch up in his Cavalier laugh.