£14 Tax deducted from £86.40 earnings via shambolic employer

£14 Tax deducted from £86.40 earnings via shambolic employer

Author
Discussion

Countdown

39,872 posts

196 months

Thursday 20th October 2016
quotequote all
2 sMoKiN bArReLs said:
D'oh!!! getmecoat

2 sMoKiN bArReLs

30,254 posts

235 months

Thursday 20th October 2016
quotequote all
As I said

If you follow this link 1100L Wk1/M1 should have been used (if it's her only current job)

If it's first job of the year 1100L could be used. (which re-reading OP sounds like this)

In any event 0 should not have been used

https://www.gov.uk/new-employee-tax-code/y/you-don...

Edited by 2 sMoKiN bArReLs on Thursday 20th October 20:06

2 sMoKiN bArReLs

30,254 posts

235 months

Thursday 20th October 2016
quotequote all
C'mon Eric....back me up here! hehe

(You can never find an accountant when you want one biggrin)

Ahbefive

11,657 posts

172 months

Thursday 20th October 2016
quotequote all
2 sMoKiN bArReLs said:
Ahbefive said:
Because with no p45 you pretty much always start on emergency tax.
Wrong on every level I'm afraid
No its not. Pretty standard practice.

2 sMoKiN bArReLs

30,254 posts

235 months

Thursday 20th October 2016
quotequote all
Ahbefive said:
2 sMoKiN bArReLs said:
Ahbefive said:
Because with no p45 you pretty much always start on emergency tax.
Wrong on every level I'm afraid
No its not. Pretty standard practice.
No, it's just not!!

Have you not checked out the HMRC link above?

Ahbefive

11,657 posts

172 months

Thursday 20th October 2016
quotequote all
Yes it just is.

Have a google if you have never had any experience of it. It's a very common occurence that has happened to tens of thousands if not hundreds of thousands if not millions of people in the UK.

2 sMoKiN bArReLs

30,254 posts

235 months

Thursday 20th October 2016
quotequote all
Ahbefive said:
Yes it just is.

Have a google if you have never had any experience of it. It's a very common occurence that has happened to tens of thousands if not hundreds of thousands if not millions of people in the UK.
Good grief.

Let's wind back. What the employer has done is fundamentally wrong. They should have gone through the process per the link above.

It ain't "standard practice" to fk it up just because many do.

The OP has come on here looking for advice, and so far mine has been the only stuff that's vaguely correct.

That's it biggrin

Ahbefive

11,657 posts

172 months

Thursday 20th October 2016
quotequote all
2 sMoKiN bArReLs said:
It ain't "standard practice" to fk it up just because many do.
Thats where you are wrong. A quick google or some real life experience of it and you would see that it is massively common.

2 sMoKiN bArReLs

30,254 posts

235 months

Thursday 20th October 2016
quotequote all
Ahbefive said:
2 sMoKiN bArReLs said:
It ain't "standard practice" to fk it up just because many do.
Thats where you are wrong. A quick google or some real life experience of it and you would see that it is massively common.
Jeez louise.

Yes it's common. No, it ain't right. Geddit?

Blimey hehe

Ahbefive

11,657 posts

172 months

Thursday 20th October 2016
quotequote all
When did I say it was right? I said its pretty standard practice, very common and you should get used to it. Geddit?

2 sMoKiN bArReLs

30,254 posts

235 months

Thursday 20th October 2016
quotequote all
Ahbefive said:
Because with no p45 you pretty much always start on emergency tax.
Full blown internet argument!

This is where you technically started to go wrong.

Pretty much always is bollicks (and there's no such thing as emergency tax since the 1970s hehe)

If an employer follows the link above the OP partner should have had 1100L or 1100L wk1/m1 tax code.

More companies get it right than get it wrong, but OP partner clearly works for muppets.

I've just twigged....are you OP boss?

biggrin


Edited by 2 sMoKiN bArReLs on Thursday 20th October 21:30

Ahbefive

11,657 posts

172 months

Thursday 20th October 2016
quotequote all
rofl

KevinCamaroSS

11,630 posts

280 months

Friday 21st October 2016
quotequote all
I'm betting that either:

a) Employee gave no information to new employer so new employer ticked the fourth option - no information;

or)

b) New employer neglected to give the new employee the New Starter Information Sheet

Best bet is B.

anonymous-user

54 months

Friday 21st October 2016
quotequote all
KevinCamaroSS said:
I'm betting that either:

a) Employee gave no information to new employer so new employer ticked the fourth option - no information;

or)

b) New employer neglected to give the new employee the New Starter Information Sheet

Best bet is B.

I've been thinking for a while that either a) or some version of that was the case. To be fair, said he OP doesn't seem too knowledgable and certain other posters appear to have taken what he has posted as being accurate and true.


Foliage

3,861 posts

122 months

Friday 21st October 2016
quotequote all
BlimeyCharlie said:
Thanks for replies, but I'm really not getting how an employer can advertise a job that pays £7.20 an hour, bearing in mind the employee (my partner) has given all information that the employer has asked for, for the employee to only get paid £6.03 an hour
Say what now?

Also she will get the tax back, maybe depending how much she works between now and april.

Maybe she should just resign, I imagine you've come on here coz shes crying about it, but this is normal.


LeighW

4,399 posts

188 months

Friday 21st October 2016
quotequote all
2 sMoKiN bArReLs said:
Ahbefive said:
Because with no p45 you pretty much always start on emergency tax.
Full blown internet argument!

This is where you technically started to go wrong.

Pretty much always is bollicks (and there's no such thing as emergency tax since the 1970s hehe)

If an employer follows the link above the OP partner should have had 1100L or 1100L wk1/m1 tax code.

More companies get it right than get it wrong, but OP partner clearly works for muppets.

I've just twigged....are you OP boss?

biggrin


Edited by 2 sMoKiN bArReLs on Thursday 20th October 21:30
I'm guessing he means 'emergency tax code' which is what a week 1 / month 1 code is often called. Bottom line, if the OP's other half completed the new starter declaration form correctly, and she's had no other employment since 6th April, then the employer should have used the normal 1100L code.

Procedure:
1) New employer is supplied with P45 - employer uses code from P45.
2) Employee completes starter checklist (replacement for old P46):
Statement A - no previous employment - code 1100L
Statement B - had other job, this is now main job - code 1100L Wk1/Mth1
Statement C - have another job - code BR (basic rate 20% tax deducted from all pay)
3) Employee doesn't provide starter checklist info - code 0T (tax decucted from all pay at appropriate rate, including higher rate if pay level dictates)




InitialDave

11,899 posts

119 months

Friday 21st October 2016
quotequote all
I'd imagine the employer either screwed up, or has a habit of defaulting to the use of a 0T and W1/M1 tax code, because it is "safer" to let more money go to the taxman, and get it back later, than to go the other way. That's not really the right mentality, but I can see how some people would behave that way.

zedstar

1,736 posts

176 months

Friday 21st October 2016
quotequote all
An employee declaring it's their first job gets a tax code this year of 1100L, subsequent job without a P45 would be 1100L W1/M1. I've never used 0T for a first job in the tax year.

Fear not though the revised tax code from HMRC wil restore her to where she should be...

s3fella

10,524 posts

187 months

Saturday 22nd October 2016
quotequote all
fk me, it's 14 quid and she will get it back next month!

thatsprettyshady

1,824 posts

165 months

Saturday 22nd October 2016
quotequote all
Okay here's some help: don't be hasty with blaming employer, they just submit details to the big bad government tax computer so are bound to abide to what it comes up with tax-wise.

Ask your better half to ring 0300 200 3300, they will go through the checks regarding previous employment and current job status, they will send details direct to your employer advising them of correct tax code.

Any overpayment will be automatically refunded in subsequent pay runs (this is the upside of the big bad government tax computer.)

FYI calm it with the below minimum wage stuff - by the same logic anyone on min wage who happens to earn over (I think?) 10k p/a and therefore subject to tax deductions will be paid "under minimum wage" at the end of the day. Again that's not the employers fault.

One last thing - you mention deductions from wages, what are these? Are they mentioned on the pay slip? What for?