1st March - 6points for mobile phone use at the wheel

1st March - 6points for mobile phone use at the wheel

Author
Discussion

speedking31

3,556 posts

136 months

Tuesday 28th February 2017
quotequote all
Maybe a reduction to 3 points if you attend a course, best of both worlds.

yellowjack

17,078 posts

166 months

Tuesday 28th February 2017
quotequote all
cb1965 said:
I read and send texts all the time while driving and will continue to do so. Hope that cheers everyone up smile
Maybe this was an attempt at humour that fell totally flat? Maybe it's the truth. Either way, it's a pretty stupid thing to say, given that there's plenty of evidence of fatalities directly caused by some utter retard using a mobile phone whilst driving.

I've demonstrated comprehensively that I can listen to two radio sets, operate one of them, AND take instruction via an intercom from my commander, and still have control of a vehicle sufficient to avoid hazards (including incoming enemy fire) outside. But I won't make calls, take incoming calls unless it's through Bluetooth, and definitely won't read or compose a text message whilst driving because the potential price I, or others might have to pay as a consequence doesn't bear thinking about.


Did the TV footage of that horrific crash on the A34 not teach anybody anything? Personally I think idiots also need to face more penalty points for sticking phones/satnavs/etc onto the windscreen directly in the drivers filed of view, and we should ban the inclusion of WiFi as a feature of new cars, because that's only going to encourage even more of Daddies' Little Princesses to discuss Beyonce Knowles' latest shade of nail polish while ignoring red traffic lights and narrowly missing mowing down pedestrians who are legitimately crossing on a green signal. Head down, reading a small screen whilst driving? You might as well drive around with your head up your own arse.

rolleyes

anonymous-user

54 months

Tuesday 28th February 2017
quotequote all
yellowjack said:
Maybe this was an attempt at humour that fell totally flat? Maybe it's the truth. Either way, it's a pretty stupid thing to say, given that there's plenty of evidence of fatalities directly caused by some utter retard using a mobile phone whilst driving.

I've demonstrated comprehensively that I can listen to two radio sets, operate one of them, AND take instruction via an intercom from my commander, and still have control of a vehicle sufficient to avoid hazards (including incoming enemy fire) outside. But I won't make calls, take incoming calls unless it's through Bluetooth, and definitely won't read or compose a text message whilst driving because the potential price I, or others might have to pay as a consequence doesn't bear thinking about.


Did the TV footage of that horrific crash on the A34 not teach anybody anything? Personally I think idiots also need to face more penalty points for sticking phones/satnavs/etc onto the windscreen directly in the drivers filed of view, and we should ban the inclusion of WiFi as a feature of new cars, because that's only going to encourage even more of Daddies' Little Princesses to discuss Beyonce Knowles' latest shade of nail polish while ignoring red traffic lights and narrowly missing mowing down pedestrians who are legitimately crossing on a green signal. Head down, reading a small screen whilst driving? You might as well drive around with your head up your own arse.

rolleyes
LOL, I use Siri... no hands off the wheel or eyes off the road. Now take this as an object lesson that when about to call someone stupid you should probably try and think a bit more first even if, as I suspect it is in your case, that will be really hard smile


Edited by anonymous-user on Tuesday 28th February 14:55

zarjaz1991

3,480 posts

123 months

Tuesday 28th February 2017
quotequote all

This is excellent news, it gives me even more reason to refuse to speak to people. Leave me alone!

Bunfighter

Original Poster:

37,141 posts

211 months

Tuesday 28th February 2017
quotequote all
speedking31 said:
Maybe a reduction to 3 points if you attend a course, best of both worlds.
Why not leave the phone alone to begin with? I still remember the time when phones were a luxury.


EU_Foreigner

2,833 posts

226 months

Tuesday 28th February 2017
quotequote all
Ah, but now you have to answer the phone if it is connected to your door bell as otherwise you miss the parcel delivery smile

BlackLabel

13,251 posts

123 months

Tuesday 28th February 2017
quotequote all
SS2. said:
codenamecueball said:
The phone in a cradle thing will need a test case before we know for certain.

Mainly because I don't even think the police know what is and isn't okay, just the cut and dry offence of holding a phone is now even more serious.
If the phone is in a cradle then it doesn't need to be handheld and won't contravene the specific mobile phone legislation.

Nothing to prevent you from using a cradled phone and being prosecuted for other offences, though - not in proper control, careless driving, etc.
The cradle must also be at a certain angle.

"Can you use your phone as a sat nav?

Yes – as long as you programme it before you start the car and set off and it's in a holder out of the 45-degree angle of the driver's view. You cant re-programme or touch it while in motion, the same rules apply for any sat nav."

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/lifestyle/motoring/to...

pingu393

7,809 posts

205 months

Tuesday 28th February 2017
quotequote all
Has "The Road Vehicles (Construction and Use) (Amendment) (No. 4) Regulations 2003" been updated. If not, where does this 45 degree stuff come from?

surveyor

17,827 posts

184 months

Tuesday 28th February 2017
quotequote all
pingu393 said:
Has "The Road Vehicles (Construction and Use) (Amendment) (No. 4) Regulations 2003" been updated. If not, where does this 45 degree stuff come from?
I think they may have made half the stuff up.

pingu393

7,809 posts

205 months

Tuesday 28th February 2017
quotequote all
speedking31 said:
Maybe a reduction to 3 points if you attend a course, best of both worlds.
That can't happen under the current system.

What happens is...

You are sent an NIP.
You admit guilt and opt for a course.
You attend the course.
The NIP is cancelled.

There is no mechanism to split the penalty.

SS2.

14,462 posts

238 months

Tuesday 28th February 2017
quotequote all
BlackLabel said:
The cradle must also be at a certain angle.
Must ?

Do you have a better source for that assertion other than the rag (and similar) from which it was lifted ?

speedking31

3,556 posts

136 months

Tuesday 28th February 2017
quotequote all
BlackLabel said:
... out of the 45-degree angle of the driver's view. You cant re-programme or touch it while in motion, the same rules apply for any sat nav."
No way.

0000

13,812 posts

191 months

Wednesday 1st March 2017
quotequote all
speedking31 said:
BlackLabel said:
... out of the 45-degree angle of the driver's view. You cant re-programme or touch it while in motion, the same rules apply for any sat nav."
No way.
I can't make any sense of that.

Humans have a much wider field of view than 45 degrees. Is that the same 45 degrees depending on when they move their seat backwards or forwards, only when they're looking directly ahead? Are the police issued with protractors?

Presumably with the standard navigation and media units these days they also think you're not allowed to change the radio station. Or the temperature.

Y Y Z

180 posts

156 months

Wednesday 1st March 2017
quotequote all
speedking31 said:
Maybe a reduction to 3 points if you attend a course, best of both worlds.
There is no option to attend a course, it's 6 points and £200 and tough titty.

croyde

22,919 posts

230 months

Wednesday 1st March 2017
quotequote all
jhonn said:
Slightly off-topic I know, but does this also cover the use of CB radios/hand held microphones too?

Reason I'm asking is that on programmes like Top Gear/grand Tour you regularly see Jeremy & Co. driving with one hand while holding a conversation with his compadres, with the microphone in the other - often wondered if it was legal.

It shows how attitudes change - nowadays I think that this is not setting a good example!
When I was a van courier in the 80s, I was often stopped for using my 2 way radio whilst driving. Always a warning tho.

Edited by croyde on Wednesday 1st March 11:24

supercommuter

2,169 posts

102 months

Wednesday 1st March 2017
quotequote all
6 points is not enough of a deterrent.

People caught on the phone should be banned for 6 weeks. People will then stop.

Davel

8,982 posts

258 months

Wednesday 1st March 2017
quotequote all
Looking forward to seeing fewer folk on the road now...

pingu393

7,809 posts

205 months

Wednesday 1st March 2017
quotequote all
Davel said:
Looking forward to seeing fewer insured folk on the road now...
Corrected that for you wink

vxr8mate

1,655 posts

189 months

Wednesday 1st March 2017
quotequote all
croyde said:
jhonn said:
Slightly off-topic I know, but does this also cover the use of CB radios/hand held microphones too?

Reason I'm asking is that on programmes like Top Gear/grand Tour you regularly see Jeremy & Co. driving with one hand while holding a conversation with his compadres, with the microphone in the other - often wondered if it was legal.

It shows how attitudes change - nowadays I think that this is not setting a good example!
When I was a van courier in the 80s, I was often stopped for using my 2 way radio whilst driving. Always a warning tho.

Edited by croyde on Wednesday 1st March 11:24
Thought '2 way's' were legal.

croyde

22,919 posts

230 months

Wednesday 1st March 2017
quotequote all
On LBC this morning they had a reporter out with the police targeting people using their phone whilst driving. They even had an unmarked HGV so that they could look down into people's cars.

But this was just one morning in a specific area of London. Can't see them doing that every day. As others have said, there are hardly any police on the road any more, just cameras aimed at speeders.

I repeat myself when I say this but 'if' I am making progress, I'm focused on driving the car and paying attention to every other road user, pedestrian, road conditions and obstacles.

As I'm doing this I see countless cars being driven erratically and dangerously BUT below the posted limit. Only one of us is going to cop a ticket.

I was stuck behind a woman in lane 3 yesterday. She was wandering all over the place oblivious to what was happening around her as she was having an animated discussion with her friend in the passenger seat.

Finally I undertook, yes I know, and continued with my journey. My car is loud and very brightly coloured yet she appeared to take no notice as she continued chatting ignorant of the big queue building up behind her.

We really do share the roads with morons, so giving them toys to play with in their modern cars really is daft.

A touch screen has got to be the worst idea by car manufacturers yet. In my old BMW I know all the switches by feel, so no need to take my eyes off the road yet my 2016 Mustang has a pretty unresponsive touchscreen which involves seconds of jabbing your finger just to adjust the heating. Stupid stupid.

Edited by croyde on Wednesday 1st March 12:47