Scaffolding Lorry/Van

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

yellowjack

17,075 posts

166 months

Monday 20th March 2017
quotequote all
Riley Blue said:
This is S,P & L and the OP asked about legality, not asthetics.
It's a forum. I supplied an unsolicited opinion. It's how forums work. Someone will be along soon enough to start tearing my opinion to pieces, telling me it's plain wrong. Then a baying mob will descend upon me in a feeding frenzy, to the point where I'll get bored and leave the thread, yet the mob will continue like dogs with a bone. It's (sadly) how PistonHeads works these days.

How fking miserable a forum would it be if every question immediately yielded the definitive answer and no-one contributed any further? There'd be one Hell of a lot of two-post threads, and we could start charging the general public for low cost legal advice...

confused

Mandat

3,884 posts

238 months

Monday 20th March 2017
quotequote all
TooMany2cvs said:
It appears to be a one-man band.
http://bulldogscaffoldingltd.co.uk
It looks like a tinpot company, the giveaway being that they can't even get their own phone number correct, on the van or even on their website.

Hackney

6,828 posts

208 months

Monday 20th March 2017
quotequote all
Insert Coin said:
Had to Google that FV 432, that's cool as feck, no complaints if you parked that outside my house laugh

Nearly all my lads take their work vans home at night, there isn't room in the yard for 40+ vans, plus most of them have no other way of getting to work and back if they don't use our vans to commute.
Presumably they all pay the relevant company car BIK tax on those vehicles for their personal use?

Similar issue where my mum lives, has been for years, a bloke brings his company van home every night (usually parked so as to make entry / exit from my folks' house very difficult; near the brow of a hill; facing the wrong way) yet probably pays no tax on it, not like my dad who had an essential company car.

Durzel

12,258 posts

168 months

Monday 20th March 2017
quotequote all
Mandat said:
It looks like a tinpot company, the giveaway being that they can't even get their own phone number correct, on the van or even on their website.
You got all that from a phone number?

The guy has a website which is a damn sight more than I've seen from most tradespeople. He even has an email address under his domain name rather than @hotmail.com or @btinternet or some other unprofessional variant that I've seen on far more lavishly sign-written vehicles.

Puzzled as to why this guy is getting so much stick for parking perfectly legally and considerately (outside of "how dare someone park a commercial vehicle on my road" nimbyism)...

anonymous-user

54 months

Monday 20th March 2017
quotequote all
Hackney said:
Presumably they all pay the relevant company car BIK tax on those vehicles for their personal use?

Similar issue where my mum lives, has been for years, a bloke brings his company van home every night (usually parked so as to make entry / exit from my folks' house very difficult; near the brow of a hill; facing the wrong way) yet probably pays no tax on it, not like my dad who had an essential company car.
Reference BIK, not your concern, and why do you think your dad's car is essential but not their neighbours van? Some proper nimby traits right there. wink


austinsmirk

5,597 posts

123 months

Monday 20th March 2017
quotequote all
A scaffolder is the wrong bloke to pick a fight with.

you'd probably be better hoping for a Citroen HY van to turn up, with a bearded, top bun'd, tattoo'd, hemp clad hipster, with organic artisan coffee/ice cream/crepes/falafel/humus catering, advertised on the side of his truck.

Red Devil

13,060 posts

208 months

Monday 20th March 2017
quotequote all
Durzel said:
Mandat said:
It looks like a tinpot company, the giveaway being that they can't even get their own phone number correct, on the van or even on their website.
You got all that from a phone number?

The guy has a website which is a damn sight more than I've seen from most tradespeople. He even has an email address under his domain name rather than @hotmail.com or @btinternet or some other unprofessional variant that I've seen on far more lavishly sign-written vehicles.

Puzzled as to why this guy is getting so much stick for parking perfectly legally and considerately (outside of "how dare someone park a commercial vehicle on my road" nimbyism)...
I think the relevant point is that the landline phone number on the truck differs from the one on the website. Why would he do that?

Durzel

12,258 posts

168 months

Monday 20th March 2017
quotequote all
Red Devil said:
I think the relevant point is that the landline phone number on the truck differs from the one on the website. Why would he do that?
*shrug*

Maybe his landline changed between getting the truck signwritten, and now? Maybe both lines still work?

JM

3,170 posts

206 months

Monday 20th March 2017
quotequote all
Durzel said:
Mandat said:
It looks like a tinpot company, the giveaway being that they can't even get their own phone number correct, on the van or even on their website.
You got all that from a phone number?

The guy has a website which is a damn sight more than I've seen from most tradespeople. He even has an email address under his domain name rather than @hotmail.com or @btinternet or some other unprofessional variant that I've seen on far more lavishly sign-written vehicles.
The company is dissolved.

Mandat

3,884 posts

238 months

Monday 20th March 2017
quotequote all
Durzel said:
Red Devil said:
I think the relevant point is that the landline phone number on the truck differs from the one on the website. Why would he do that?
*shrug*

Maybe his landline changed between getting the truck signwritten, and now? Maybe both lines still work?
It's not that the landline numbers on the van and the website are different, it's that they are both incorrect anyway.

TooMany2cvs

29,008 posts

126 months

Monday 20th March 2017
quotequote all
Mandat said:
It's not that the landline numbers on the van and the website are different, it's that they are both incorrect anyway.
Is this just an 020x xxx vs 020 xxxx thing?

Mandat

3,884 posts

238 months

Monday 20th March 2017
quotequote all
TooMany2cvs said:
Is this just an 020x xxx vs 020 xxxx thing?
Was I being too subtle? smile

The 020x mistake is a pet hate of mine. We've had the London 020 dialing code for nearly 18 years now, but some people still can't get it right. smash

Durzel

12,258 posts

168 months

Monday 20th March 2017
quotequote all
JM said:
The company is dissolved.
Ok, had

OldGermanHeaps

3,827 posts

178 months

Monday 20th March 2017
quotequote all
Hackney said:
Presumably they all pay the relevant company car BIK tax on those vehicles for their personal use?

Similar issue where my mum lives, has been for years, a bloke brings his company van home every night (usually parked so as to make entry / exit from my folks' house very difficult; near the brow of a hill; facing the wrong way) yet probably pays no tax on it, not like my dad who had an essential company car.
They don't have to on a van if they have no fixed work address if they go job to job in different locations then for bik purposes their jouney to and from home is business mileage. If they have to travel to the same depot every day before work then it would be private mileage and bik would apply but most companies take this into account when planning jobs.
It is an ugly pile of ste and it must be a pain it taking 2 spaces, but do you really want to start problems with a scaffolder? 100% of the scaffolders i know are good guys but i wouldn't want to get on the wrong side of them.

Edited by OldGermanHeaps on Monday 20th March 19:40


Edited by OldGermanHeaps on Monday 20th March 19:42

Hackney

6,828 posts

208 months

Monday 20th March 2017
quotequote all
OldGermanHeaps said:
They don't have to on a van if they have no fixed work address if they go job to job in different locations then for bik purposes their jouney to and from home is business mileage. If they have to travel to the same depot every day before work then it would be private mileage and bik would apply but most companies take this into account when planning jobs.
It is an ugly pile of ste and it must be a pain it taking 2 spaces, but do you really want to start problems with a scaffolder? 100% of the scaffolders i know are good guys but i wouldn't want to get on the wrong side of them.

Edited by OldGermanHeaps on Monday 20th March 19:40


Edited by OldGermanHeaps on Monday 20th March 19:42
They do have a fixed work address.
Insert Coin said:
Nearly all my lads take their work vans home at night, there isn't room in the yard for 40+ vans, plus most of them have no other way of getting to work and back if they don't use our vans to commute.

Hackney

6,828 posts

208 months

Monday 20th March 2017
quotequote all
Insert Coin said:
Hackney said:
Presumably they all pay the relevant company car BIK tax on those vehicles for their personal use?

Similar issue where my mum lives, has been for years, a bloke brings his company van home every night (usually parked so as to make entry / exit from my folks' house very difficult; near the brow of a hill; facing the wrong way) yet probably pays no tax on it, not like my dad who had an essential company car.
Reference BIK, not your concern, and why do you think your dad's car is essential but not their neighbours van? Some proper nimby traits right there. wink
It's my concern if I have to pay tax on something that you / your employees don't.
You gave an example where you let employees take the vans home at night. That's private use. The same thing that company car drivers get hit for. Because the car is seen as a perk, however essential it is for the job.

In my case the job starts as soon as I leave home - no fixed office / depot to go to - if a van driver goes back to a depot before starting work it's private use.

The neighbour I referrred to had 2 cars and a caravan, with enough space off street for two of those vehicles. So he had no need to bring the van home (he had a car to commute in) other than the mileage went on the van rather than his own car.

SVTRick

3,633 posts

195 months

Monday 20th March 2017
quotequote all
yellowjack said:
Good. Perhaps then he'll rethink his decision to park a commercial vehicle outside a residential property, and park the blasted eyesore in the company yard. It's one thing to park a "one-man-band" tradesman's van outside his house. I've got two neighbours who's vans I don't particularly like parked in the street, but they have nowhere else to put them. But I find it hard to believe that a scaffolding firm owns only the tubes, boards, and clamps loaded into a single vehicle. Selfish, IMHO, to park such a large, ugly POS outside houses, especially if parking is already at a premium.

The "bloke's company" has created their own bad PR by sanctioning this, to be honest...
Where do you live? I would love to park a couple of my vans outside for a few weeks just to piss you off.....

Old Tyke

288 posts

86 months

Monday 20th March 2017
quotequote all
yellowjack said:
Riley Blue said:
This is S,P & L and the OP asked about legality, not asthetics.
It's a forum. I supplied an unsolicited opinion. It's how forums work. Someone will be along soon enough to start tearing my opinion to pieces, telling me it's plain wrong. Then a baying mob will descend upon me in a feeding frenzy, to the point where I'll get bored and leave the thread, yet the mob will continue like dogs with a bone. It's (sadly) how PistonHeads works these days.

How fking miserable a forum would it be if every question immediately yielded the definitive answer and no-one contributed any further? There'd be one Hell of a lot of two-post threads, and we could start charging the general public for low cost legal advice...

confused
Has it not occured to you that the kind of responses you get may in some way be connected to you acting like a colossal bell-end in nearly every post you make? Try communicating with people in a proper acceptable fashion and it will be reciprocated.

Hackney

6,828 posts

208 months

Monday 20th March 2017
quotequote all
SVTRick said:
yellowjack said:
Good. Perhaps then he'll rethink his decision to park a commercial vehicle outside a residential property, and park the blasted eyesore in the company yard. It's one thing to park a "one-man-band" tradesman's van outside his house. I've got two neighbours who's vans I don't particularly like parked in the street, but they have nowhere else to put them. But I find it hard to believe that a scaffolding firm owns only the tubes, boards, and clamps loaded into a single vehicle. Selfish, IMHO, to park such a large, ugly POS outside houses, especially if parking is already at a premium.

The "bloke's company" has created their own bad PR by sanctioning this, to be honest...
Where do you live? I would love to park a couple of my vans outside for a few weeks just to piss you off.....
And that's exactly the attitude that pisses people off, so thanks for proving the point.

XCP

16,909 posts

228 months

Monday 20th March 2017
quotequote all
Compared to my van, that is a tidy motor.
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED