Driving overweight van

Author
Discussion

bigothunter

11,413 posts

61 months

Sunday 18th February
quotequote all
Fast Bug said:
bigothunter said:
The simple 1978 Transit Mk2 LWB had a 190 variant. That meant 1900kg payload in a 3500kg GVM. Modern vans have lost their way rolleyes
Modern vans have a heck of a lot more safety items than a 1978 Transit. They also have to comply with emissions regulations that mean more and more complex components. All of which add weight. I'd much rather crash in a new Transit than a 1978 Transit that's for sure...
Which results in vans plated at 3500kg GVM frequently operating overloaded, as explained above. You can't have it both ways.

Fast Bug

11,754 posts

162 months

Sunday 18th February
quotequote all
bigothunter said:
Fast Bug said:
bigothunter said:
The simple 1978 Transit Mk2 LWB had a 190 variant. That meant 1900kg payload in a 3500kg GVM. Modern vans have lost their way rolleyes
Modern vans have a heck of a lot more safety items than a 1978 Transit. They also have to comply with emissions regulations that mean more and more complex components. All of which add weight. I'd much rather crash in a new Transit than a 1978 Transit that's for sure...
Which results in vans plated at 3500kg GVM frequently operating overloaded, as explained above. You can't have it both ways.
Good job I'm not complaining about it. It's down to operators to make sure they're not running overweight. I've lost count of the number of times I've been asked if uorated rear springs are available as the operators don't want a van to look overloaded

KTMsm

26,951 posts

264 months

Sunday 18th February
quotequote all
Fast Bug said:
Good job I'm not complaining about it. It's down to operators to make sure they're not running overweight. I've lost count of the number of times I've been asked if uorated rear springs are available as the operators don't want a van to look overloaded
Airbags and an onboard compressor wink



Cats_pyjamas

1,449 posts

149 months

Sunday 18th February
quotequote all
It is surprising how weight adds up. Really lwb and xlwb 3500kg sprinters aren't really fit for purpose, in the way they can loaded up but you could find yourself massively overweight.

I have a self built small camper/day van. 3200kg lwb high top transit custom. These aren't particularly big, I was pretty weight conscious for the build. Dry weight, (without the water tanks full and gas on board) it weighs in at just under 2700kg. Fully loaded with 2 passengers it just over 3000kg.

Most large vans (when plated to 3500kg) conversions and horse boxes will be overweight when loaded.

RSpiston

125 posts

96 months

Sunday 18th February
quotequote all
Reminded me of a spot last week. A Romanian plated VW Tow Rag passed me on my MTB with a wide trailer in tow. 4 hours later I saw the same outfit, on the same road, but now going in the opposite direction. This time with a Romanian plated Merc Sprinter on the trailer.

I thought at the time that must be well overweight !

Fast Bug

11,754 posts

162 months

Sunday 18th February
quotequote all
KTMsm said:
Fast Bug said:
Good job I'm not complaining about it. It's down to operators to make sure they're not running overweight. I've lost count of the number of times I've been asked if uorated rear springs are available as the operators don't want a van to look overloaded
Airbags and an onboard compressor wink
Yup. Not from me though, a customer can do whatever they want once they've taken delivery, but I'm not getting things like that fitted for them

KTMsm

26,951 posts

264 months

Sunday 18th February
quotequote all
RSpiston said:
Reminded me of a spot last week. A Romanian plated VW Tow Rag passed me on my MTB with a wide trailer in tow. 4 hours later I saw the same outfit, on the same road, but now going in the opposite direction. This time with a Romanian plated Merc Sprinter on the trailer.

I thought at the time that must be well overweight !
VW Touareg will tow 3500kg so as long as the Sprinter was empty it would be legal

Tam_Mullen

2,306 posts

173 months

Monday 19th February
quotequote all
I used to do a lot of RTV/CCVT off-roading. One guy had a 100" 'Defender' fully kitted up with heavy duty offroad protection, external rollcage 3 winches etc etc. He was towing it with a FWD transit and was pulled coming over the Tay Bridge in Dundee, he was something like 2T over the towing capacity of the van he was driving.

Expecting a big fine, instead he was fined £50 and just had to get someone else from the club to come grab the trailer.

MDMA .

8,954 posts

102 months

Monday 19th February
quotequote all
KTMsm said:
RSpiston said:
Reminded me of a spot last week. A Romanian plated VW Tow Rag passed me on my MTB with a wide trailer in tow. 4 hours later I saw the same outfit, on the same road, but now going in the opposite direction. This time with a Romanian plated Merc Sprinter on the trailer.

I thought at the time that must be well overweight !
VW Touareg will tow 3500kg so as long as the Sprinter was empty it would be legal
A good twin axle trailer able to carry a Sprinter will be about 950kg. Empty L2 Sprinter is about 2200kg, so well within the limit.
We have a lot of collection firms running Touaregs now. Good tow vehicle.

RSpiston

125 posts

96 months

Monday 19th February
quotequote all
MDMA . said:
A good twin axle trailer able to carry a Sprinter will be about 950kg. Empty L2 Sprinter is about 2200kg, so well within the limit.
We have a lot of collection firms running Touaregs now. Good tow vehicle.
OK, fairly sure it was a 3 axle trailer from memory. Interesting about the towing capacity of the Touaregs.

CoolHands

18,771 posts

196 months

Monday 19th February
quotequote all
If most / many vans are running overweight yet they don’t cause accidents then the rules should be changed as clearly they’re too restrictive.

blank

3,467 posts

189 months

Monday 19th February
quotequote all
Saw a "recovery truck" today that reminded me of this thread.

Looked very much like a 3.5t chassis (can't tell for sure) and it had a hybrid X5 on the back.

Was probably at least a tonne overweight if it was a 3.5t chassis.

blank

3,467 posts

189 months

Monday 19th February
quotequote all
RSpiston said:
OK, fairly sure it was a 3 axle trailer from memory. Interesting about the towing capacity of the Touaregs.
See also Jeep Grand Cherokee, most Range Rovers and the Touareg sister vehicles (Q7, Cayenne).

They work well as tow vehicles as they're not goods vehicles so you can avoid tachos, operators licences etc. When you hook a trailer up to a goods vehicle and end up over 3.5t train weight all these things come in to play and it gets very complicated with rules about what you can tow and how far.

Modern dual cab pickups are often too heavy to class as "dual purpose" so fall into this as well.

Another rule rarely enforced and broken all the time I guess!

nikaiyo2

4,776 posts

196 months

Monday 19th February
quotequote all
oceanview said:
At work ,our new transit tippers weigh 2800 with just a few tools in the back and a light passenger.

That means we can only legally carry 700kg in the back before we hit the 3500kg limit.

The trouble is, the modern vans are much heavier than from say 20-30 years ago but, the 3500kg limit has stayed the same.
Yeah It’s mad. The drive train on a modern van bares no relation to what was used when the weight categories were introduced.

The days of an LDV Convoy with an engine that could barely pull the skin of custard and brakes that barely function even unloaded are thankfully a thing of the past. Even cheap Fiat vans are brilliant in comparison.

colinrob

Original Poster:

1,198 posts

252 months

Monday 19th February
quotequote all
Personally I think the rules are madness's, I suppose its a but like braking distances, everything is out of date but the rules are there, if you get caught you took the risk, if you didn't you are lucky, sold my van now so will not drive overweight, I made a stupid mistake being overweight, won't do it again.

loskie

5,287 posts

121 months

Monday 19th February
quotequote all
A1 today heading north near Retford. 70 plate Luton type van with 2 Asian guys in.

80 mph in the outside lane. Rear near side wheel/tyre looked well over loaded. Tyre deformed and right up into the wheel arch. They were barely in control. TBH I did contemplate calling the Police it was so bad. They travelled for some miles at this speed,

Cat

3,025 posts

270 months

Monday 19th February
quotequote all
blank said:
See also Jeep Grand Cherokee, most Range Rovers and the Touareg sister vehicles (Q7, Cayenne).

They work well as tow vehicles as they're not goods vehicles so you can avoid tachos, operators licences etc. When you hook a trailer up to a goods vehicle and end up over 3.5t train weight all these things come in to play and it gets very complicated with rules about what you can tow and how far.
This is not right. Whether a tacho is needed is dependent on the use of the vehicle/combination and it's weight. It is nothing to do with whether or not the vehicle is a "goods vehicle".

If the GVW or GTW exceeds 3500kg and it used for commercial purposes then it requires a tacho (unless one of the exemptions or derogations apply). This applies even if the tow vehicle is not a "goods vehicle".

Cat

blank

3,467 posts

189 months

Monday 19th February
quotequote all
Cat said:
blank said:
See also Jeep Grand Cherokee, most Range Rovers and the Touareg sister vehicles (Q7, Cayenne).

They work well as tow vehicles as they're not goods vehicles so you can avoid tachos, operators licences etc. When you hook a trailer up to a goods vehicle and end up over 3.5t train weight all these things come in to play and it gets very complicated with rules about what you can tow and how far.
This is not right. Whether a tacho is needed is dependent on the use of the vehicle/combination and it's weight. It is nothing to do with whether or not the vehicle is a "goods vehicle".

If the GVW or GTW exceeds 3500kg and it used for commercial purposes then it requires a tacho (unless one of the exemptions or derogations apply). This applies even if the tow vehicle is not a "goods vehicle".

Cat
I'm sure you're right, but can you point me to the legislation on that because that's not the conclusion our transport manager came to?

Cat

3,025 posts

270 months

Monday 19th February
quotequote all
blank said:
I'm sure you're right, but can you point me to the legislation on that because that's not the conclusion our transport manager came to?
Your TM has come to the wrong conclusion...

Transport Act 1968 and Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

Cat

Chainsaw Rebuild

2,012 posts

103 months

Tuesday 20th February
quotequote all
Cat said:
blank said:
I'm sure you're right, but can you point me to the legislation on that because that's not the conclusion our transport manager came to?
Your TM has come to the wrong conclusion...

Transport Act 1968 and Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

Cat
TM here l, just to concur with Cat - it applies to any vehicle and your TM is wrong. You are going to need an O licence and the rest of it.