Cameras to detect No Seatbelt/Use of mobile phone offenders?

Cameras to detect No Seatbelt/Use of mobile phone offenders?

Author
Discussion

Einion Yrth

19,575 posts

245 months

Tuesday 7th March 2006
quotequote all
Dwight VanDriver said:


Noon BBC News has reported HMG against this as it would be an invasion of your privacy.....

My irony meter has just given up under the strain

XMG5

Original Poster:

1,082 posts

228 months

Tuesday 7th March 2006
quotequote all
[qoute from newspaper] Department of Transport figures released under the Freedom of Information Act indicated that total fine receipts for speeding and traffic light offences detected by camera in 2003-04 were £113.5m, of which nearly £92m was "reinvested in road safety as payments back to ... the police, local highway authorities and magistrates courts". The Treasury retained the balance of nearly £22m. [unquote]

Since when does money handed back to the POLICE and MAGISTRATES COURTS contribute towards road safety? Less police presance on the roads, more policing by scameras?
Magistrates fining motorists who find themselves before the Bench? Where does that improve road safety???

mrandy

828 posts

219 months

Tuesday 7th March 2006
quotequote all
they already do this in southern ireland with success,1st the smoikng ban then this ,the UK will inevitbly follow no doubt,i always forget to wear my seat belt and get tempted to use my mobile when driving so without wearing my tin hat i think it cant be bad

catso

14,795 posts

268 months

Tuesday 7th March 2006
quotequote all
Twunt from the government said:
"Those responsible for 7/7 got to Luton station by car."


So, if they had comitted a motoring offence on route to a mass murder, they might have received a £60 + NIP 14 days later?

You have no idea how much better I shall sleep tonight with that knowledge!

nel

4,770 posts

242 months

Tuesday 7th March 2006
quotequote all
The market for light coloured T-shirts with a diagonal black line on them will be booming soon then. Also, coloured phone holders disguising the phone as something else should be popular too. Can they prosecute you for driving along with a banana held to your ear?

mrandy

828 posts

219 months

Tuesday 7th March 2006
quotequote all
nel said:
The market for light coloured T-shirts with a diagonal black line on them will be booming soon then. Also, coloured phone holders disguising the phone as something else should be popular too. Can they prosecute you for driving along with a banana held to your ear?
only if its loaded

Raify

6,552 posts

249 months

Tuesday 7th March 2006
quotequote all
catso said:
Twunt from the government said:
"Those responsible for 7/7 got to Luton station by car."


So, if they had comitted a motoring offence on route to a mass murder, they might have received a £60 + NIP 14 days later?

You have no idea how much better I shall sleep tonight with that knowledge!


Not only that, but if they'd had ID cards, the government would have been able to identify them IMMEDIATELY! Tap their name into a database....

"Aha! Got them, they've failed to renew their insurance!"

"Err, Sarge. They're dead, and the crime happened 3 hours ago."

XMG5

Original Poster:

1,082 posts

228 months

Tuesday 7th March 2006
quotequote all
nel said:
Can they prosecute you for driving along with a banana held to your ear?


Now that's just silly....try a pineapple.

>> Edited by XMG5 on Tuesday 7th March 15:36

mojocvh

16,837 posts

263 months

Tuesday 7th March 2006
quotequote all
Tafia said:
Could the dark blue Traffic Master cameras be used for this? We were told they were simply to check on traffic flows and hold-ups but I wondered at the time why it needed cameras. Inductiveloops can count traffic and detect halted traffic.

Hmmmm


Traffic master has the gubbins to read plates it's just that the "operater" does not use this facility (yet)

zumbruk

7,848 posts

261 months

Tuesday 7th March 2006
quotequote all
Raify said:
ashes said:
Interesting that the spokesman for Amenesty (Liberty?) doesn't mind. If all this spying isn't a threat to Civil Liberty what is?

And I like the quote about 7/7 - how would they have picked up the terrorists. They didn't have any labels on them?

Look for the story this has been put out to hide


I just spotted that quote, completely ridiculous.

Twunt from the government said:
"One of the good things about ANPR is that people are often multiple offenders so it would provide useful intelligence," he said. "Those responsible for 7/7 got to Luton station by car."


Their car was taxed, insured and MOTed and they bought both a valid parking ticket and return train tickets. The "point" about the 7/7 bombers is Lies, Lies, Lies. Much as everything else that people want to do on the back of terrorism. Always remember; how can you tell a politician is lying? His mouth is moving.

pg53

37 posts

228 months

Wednesday 8th March 2006
quotequote all
grauniad said:
It is also argued that the cameras bring in essential revenue.


Indeed.

also in the grauniad he said:
that for greater safety and "the greater good of society", most people would be prepared to accept "a slight reduction of our liberty".

That 'slight reduction' trotted out again. Now how many 'slight reductions' have we seen recently?