Letter for Employee
Discussion
turbobloke said:
The truth!
He volunteers at night to drive disabled gay Muslim children around or something like that should do it
HTH.
But - no no no.
He volunteers to drive disabled gay muslim adopted orphan child asylum seekers.
Nononono.
He volunteers to drive disabled gay muslim adopted orphan child asylum seekers to rescue baby seals.
The combination is, I think, a winner.
turbobloke said:
The truth!
He volunteers at night to drive disabled gay Muslim children around or something like that should do it
HTH.
But - no no no.
He volunteers to drive disabled gay muslim adopted orphan child asylum seekers.
to the rescue centre to see the seals he rescued at the weekend.
TheLemming said:
The truth!
He volunteers at night to drive disabled gay Muslim children around or something like that should do it
HTH.
But - no no no.
He volunteers to drive disabled gay muslim adopted orphan child asylum seekers.
Nononono.
He volunteers to drive disabled gay muslim adopted orphan child asylum seekers to rescue baby seals.
The combination is, I think, a winner.
no no no no no............it must included the word "lesbian" to have any effect.....as well as all the other ones
Can't you say that as a member of the xyz faith he's obliged to travel above the speed limit at least once every journey to appease his God? Else he'll burn in hell for all eternity or something?
Surely the magistrate wouldn't want to discriminate against his minority faith in the interests of diversity?
SM
Surely the magistrate wouldn't want to discriminate against his minority faith in the interests of diversity?
SM
padgett - sorted
should have the desired effect.After the bollocking we got from Ted about having fun, I'm surprised this hasn't been locked.
Anyway, even though all of the posts made me laugh we'd better give a real answer otherwise we'll all get banned.
The only way he's not going to get a ban is to point out that OTHER people will suffer if he loses his licence: granny has to go to hospital, etc. You could also mention that his actions were totally out of character.... nice bloke... etc. Basically... sell him.
Another thing that might help is if you told him he drives a (insert vehicle of choice) and has enough problems in his life already.
Anyway, even though all of the posts made me laugh we'd better give a real answer otherwise we'll all get banned.
The only way he's not going to get a ban is to point out that OTHER people will suffer if he loses his licence: granny has to go to hospital, etc. You could also mention that his actions were totally out of character.... nice bloke... etc. Basically... sell him.
Another thing that might help is if you told him he drives a (insert vehicle of choice) and has enough problems in his life already.
blueyes said:
The only way he's not going to get a ban is to point out that OTHER people will suffer if he loses his licence: granny has to go to hospital, etc. You could also mention that his actions were totally out of character.... nice bloke... etc. Basically... sell him.
Another thing that might help is if you told him he drives a (insert vehicle of choice) and has enough problems in his life already.
theres a couple of problems with this -
he's Scottish and rides a Pan European (aka pizza delivery vehicle)
>> Edited by padgett on Tuesday 25th April 11:27
blueyes said:Not sure the bollocking was about fun as opposed to smut...and I think parody, irony, withering criticism where due, all have an exemption.
After the bollocking we got from Ted about having fun, I'm surprised this hasn't been locked.
In other words it's a ted cert to be OK...
blueyes said:
The only way he's not going to get a ban is to point out that OTHER people will suffer if he loses his licence: granny has to go to hospital, etc. You could also mention that his actions were totally out of character.... nice bloke... etc. Basically... sell him.
A Ban for 51 in a 40? I doubt it! 3 points aint it?
Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff