Tesco's ANPR, again!
Discussion
Chrispy Porker said:
They are a private company who live or die on whether people buy their products.
Vote with your wallet.
I would have thought that was fairly easy to grasp.
I could apply this rule with bib but I choose not to Things aren't quite that black or white and tesco are clearly over stepping the mark. Most punters don't know what's happening and are only focused on low prices. Ignorance is bliss and all that.Vote with your wallet.
I would have thought that was fairly easy to grasp.
Boosted.
sheets tabuer said:
Is the letter off tesco, most of the large supermarkets are rented on a park and the car park is nothing to do with tesco.
Mrs is a senior manager so I will ask her
That's the strange thing. The letter has a photocopy of a tesco letterhead with their registered office address on the footer. it's automated and was sent from a Tesco Dundee address. Tesco's bought the land, this is a two storey store with a ground level car park. It's pretty huge and not on a retail park.Mrs is a senior manager so I will ask her
Boosted.
Sorry, slightly confused.
Tesco think they have the right to fine you for staying in their car park?
Time to shop a sainsburys.
Just how does a supermarket have the right to issue fines?
I thought that only a court could fine you under the bill of rights act, once you have been found guilty in court.
Tesco think they have the right to fine you for staying in their car park?
Time to shop a sainsburys.
Just how does a supermarket have the right to issue fines?
I thought that only a court could fine you under the bill of rights act, once you have been found guilty in court.
odyssey2200 said:
Sorry, slightly confused.
Tesco think they have the right to fine you for staying in their car park?
Time to shop a sainsburys.
Just how does a supermarket have the right to issue fines?
I thought that only a court could fine you under the bill of rights act, once you have been found guilty in court.
Ah, but this is one of those fixed penalty's co cleverly not a fine, just an invitation to cough up. They're all at it these days. Bill of rights was ignored years ago by side stepping the mark.Tesco think they have the right to fine you for staying in their car park?
Time to shop a sainsburys.
Just how does a supermarket have the right to issue fines?
I thought that only a court could fine you under the bill of rights act, once you have been found guilty in court.
Boosted.
odyssey2200 said:
So, If when they write to you and invite you to pay up, you write back inviting they to go F themselves, what jurisdiction or powers do they have?
Nope, I'm going to ask them what evidence they have and see what they say. I'll see if they wish to disclose the whole day's video assuming the data is a video recording. That'll cause them some data protection issues. First, I'll do some more visits to the car park to test their system and call their bluff. As for enforcement, they are pretty powerless if they can't identify the driver.Boosted.
Boosted LS1 said:
I expect they'll refer to their parking terms and conditions and then persue through the county court, assuming you read the terms first.
Boosted.
Which brings us back to the discussion (in a related post some weeks ago) on the obvious display of Ts & Cs (the contract terms) ... which they're not doing - StreakyBoosted.
To whom it may concern
[Add their title and address, Miss Jones}
I am in receipt of your letter dated [insert the date Miss Jones] alleging that a vehicle registered to me overstayed an arbitrary duration in a vehicle park attached to one of your stores.
As I am sure you will be aware, it is the driver of the vehicle with whom any contract to park was made, not the Registered Keeper. You will also be aware that the terms of any such contract must be set out in such a manner as to be obvious to anyone with whom you wished to make the contract. These terms must comply with all applicable contract law, such as the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977.
Should you wish to pursue this claim, please supply evidence that the person parking the vehicle you allege to have overstayed the set duration would have had the opportunity to read the contract terms. Such evidence must be, as a minimum:
I expect your reply by return, either providing the evidence requested above or indicating simply your termination of this correspondence.
[Just PP it Miss Jones ... and are we still on for some nookie tonight?]
Streaky
[Add their title and address, Miss Jones}
I am in receipt of your letter dated [insert the date Miss Jones] alleging that a vehicle registered to me overstayed an arbitrary duration in a vehicle park attached to one of your stores.
As I am sure you will be aware, it is the driver of the vehicle with whom any contract to park was made, not the Registered Keeper. You will also be aware that the terms of any such contract must be set out in such a manner as to be obvious to anyone with whom you wished to make the contract. These terms must comply with all applicable contract law, such as the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977.
Should you wish to pursue this claim, please supply evidence that the person parking the vehicle you allege to have overstayed the set duration would have had the opportunity to read the contract terms. Such evidence must be, as a minimum:
- a detailed route and timings of the vehicle's travel into and through the vehicle park;
- a detailed route of the driver's passage out of the vehicle and into the store - this and the evidence listed immediately above are to show that the driver had reasonable opportunity to see and read the contract terms;
- photographs of all relevant signage in situ in locus in quo at the time of the alleged overstaying so as to show that the signs were actually readable;
- an accurately-drawn, scaled, map showing the location of each sign and indicating which you believe the driver would have had the easy opportunity to read (the routes of the vehicle and driver should be superimposed upon the map);
- details of the weather conditions at the time, in particular the visibility (all to be confirmed by the Meteorological Office);
- sufficient details of the driver with whom you claim to have made a contract to enable their unique identification;
- a detailed description of the processes followed to record and analyse the evidence of the alleged overstaying; and
- a notarised statement from a senior manager at the store to the effect that your recording and analytical systems were working normally at the time of the alleged overstaying.
I expect your reply by return, either providing the evidence requested above or indicating simply your termination of this correspondence.
[Just PP it Miss Jones ... and are we still on for some nookie tonight?]
Streaky
With apologies to any feminists or others offended by the last remark - S
Edited to remove repetition - S
Edited by streaky on Saturday 23 June 12:49
Boosted LS1 said:
Chrispy Porker said:
They are a private company who live or die on whether people buy their products.
Vote with your wallet.
I would have thought that was fairly easy to grasp.
I could apply this rule with bib but I choose not to Things aren't quite that black or white and tesco are clearly over stepping the mark. Most punters don't know what's happening and are only focused on low prices. Ignorance is bliss and all that.Vote with your wallet.
I would have thought that was fairly easy to grasp.
Boosted.
It is that black and white. Don't like Tesco, go somewhere else.Sorted.Their loss.
Chrispy Porker said:
Boosted LS1 said:
Chrispy Porker said:
They are a private company who live or die on whether people buy their products.
Vote with your wallet.
I would have thought that was fairly easy to grasp.
I could apply this rule with bib but I choose not to Things aren't quite that black or white and tesco are clearly over stepping the mark. Most punters don't know what's happening and are only focused on low prices. Ignorance is bliss and all that.Vote with your wallet.
I would have thought that was fairly easy to grasp.
Boosted.
It is that black and white. Don't like Tesco, go somewhere else.Sorted.Their loss.
Boosted.
Boosted LS1 said:
Chrispy Porker said:
Boosted LS1 said:
Chrispy Porker said:
They are a private company who live or die on whether people buy their products.
Vote with your wallet.
I would have thought that was fairly easy to grasp.
I could apply this rule with bib but I choose not to Things aren't quite that black or white and tesco are clearly over stepping the mark. Most punters don't know what's happening and are only focused on low prices. Ignorance is bliss and all that.Vote with your wallet.
I would have thought that was fairly easy to grasp.
Boosted.
It is that black and white. Don't like Tesco, go somewhere else.Sorted.Their loss.
Boosted.
This made the local headlines, and they have lost a lot of customers - we used to be 50/50 between Tesco and Waitrose, but now are entirely Waitrose. Interestingly Waitrose employ car park agents and Tesco don't
Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff