AXE ATTACK on Speed Camera Operator and van!
Discussion
Well TY v much for the kind words and support 
I appreciate it. It is a true worthy acknowledgement to Paul's thorough and excellent work, that so many have continued their support.
Driving is a matter of psychology, and it takes much intelligent thought, and research (politically unbiased), to arrive at proper and consistent improvements. Then we can rely on the systems in place, anything less is playing with people's lives.
If the frustration that someone has suffered, in our daily lives, reaches the point where, they have felt that direct action is 'actually' acted upon, then questions have to be asked politically, 'is our policy really right' or, 'was this a one off incident limited by a specific individual'. This should follow up with is the system good but resulting in injustices, to one or more specific society groups?
Was this party that committed this offense from one of those 'group's' or of another.
If this is the case, then why was this 'group' not previously identified, and proper rules applied, from the (intelligent) research, before the system was implemented.
Anything less i.e. commit and roll out a system without thorough research is playing with the psychology of society and specifically, driving & drivers, with potentially disastrous consequences.
See [url=http://www.safespeed.org.uk/effects.html]here[/url], to view what we see as the potential detrimental effects from cameras, on all drivers, ... should we have missed anything, please let me know ...
I appreciate it. It is a true worthy acknowledgement to Paul's thorough and excellent work, that so many have continued their support.
Driving is a matter of psychology, and it takes much intelligent thought, and research (politically unbiased), to arrive at proper and consistent improvements. Then we can rely on the systems in place, anything less is playing with people's lives.
If the frustration that someone has suffered, in our daily lives, reaches the point where, they have felt that direct action is 'actually' acted upon, then questions have to be asked politically, 'is our policy really right' or, 'was this a one off incident limited by a specific individual'. This should follow up with is the system good but resulting in injustices, to one or more specific society groups?
Was this party that committed this offense from one of those 'group's' or of another.
If this is the case, then why was this 'group' not previously identified, and proper rules applied, from the (intelligent) research, before the system was implemented.
Anything less i.e. commit and roll out a system without thorough research is playing with the psychology of society and specifically, driving & drivers, with potentially disastrous consequences.
See [url=http://www.safespeed.org.uk/effects.html]here[/url], to view what we see as the potential detrimental effects from cameras, on all drivers, ... should we have missed anything, please let me know ...
Edited by SafeSpeedv2 on Sunday 29th June 16:20
SafeSpeedv2 said:
Well TY v much for the kind words and support
I appreciate it. It is a true worthy acknowledgement to Paul's thorough and excellent work, that so many have continued their support.
Driving is a matter of psychology, and it takes much intelligent thought, and research (politically unbiased), to arrive at proper and consistent improvements. Then we can rely on the systems in place, anything less is playing with people's lives.
If the frustration that someone has suffered, in our daily lives, reaches the point where, they have felt that direct action is 'actually' acted upon, then questions have to be asked politically, 'is our policy really right' or, 'was this a one off incident limited by a specific individual'. This should follow up with is the system good but resulting in injustices, to one or more specific society groups?
Was this party that committed this offense from one of those 'group's' or of another.
If this is the case, then why was this 'group' not previously identified, and proper rules applied, from the (intelligent) research, before the system was implemented.
Anything less i.e. commit and roll out a system without thorough research is playing with the psychology of society and specifically, driving & drivers, with potentially disastrous consequences.
See [url=http://www.safespeed.org.uk/effects.html]here[/url], to view what we see as the potential detrimental effects from cameras, on all drivers, ... should we have missed anything, please let me know ...
Claire, a couple of questions: I appreciate it. It is a true worthy acknowledgement to Paul's thorough and excellent work, that so many have continued their support.
Driving is a matter of psychology, and it takes much intelligent thought, and research (politically unbiased), to arrive at proper and consistent improvements. Then we can rely on the systems in place, anything less is playing with people's lives.
If the frustration that someone has suffered, in our daily lives, reaches the point where, they have felt that direct action is 'actually' acted upon, then questions have to be asked politically, 'is our policy really right' or, 'was this a one off incident limited by a specific individual'. This should follow up with is the system good but resulting in injustices, to one or more specific society groups?
Was this party that committed this offense from one of those 'group's' or of another.
If this is the case, then why was this 'group' not previously identified, and proper rules applied, from the (intelligent) research, before the system was implemented.
Anything less i.e. commit and roll out a system without thorough research is playing with the psychology of society and specifically, driving & drivers, with potentially disastrous consequences.
See [url=http://www.safespeed.org.uk/effects.html]here[/url], to view what we see as the potential detrimental effects from cameras, on all drivers, ... should we have missed anything, please let me know ...
Edited by SafeSpeedv2 on Sunday 29th June 16:20
1/
Why did smith encourage people to pervert justice? He suggested people use dead people to duck speeding fines, do you support this please?
2/
Why did he lie about his qualifications and pretend he was a road safety engineer when he was, in fact, a computer engineer?
3/
Why did Jonksch demand that smith remove all references to him from his website?
4/
Why did smith deny posting the peversion of justice advice on his website, the admit posting it?
5/
Why did smith demand all donations to his website be made by cheque, payable to him?
6/
What was the result of smith's PCC complaint against The Times? He claimed he won the case, yet The Times have no record of this and deny any complaint was upheld. The PC concur. No camplaint by smith was recorded, and certainly not won.
7/
Why did smith lie about the LAS report cited above? He claimed speed bumps killed 500 people a year. When he was shown that this was utter b
ks he refused to remove the claim from his website. Why?8/
Why did smith misrepresent Linda Mountain's research and pass it off as his own?
9/
Why did smith claim he alone discovered RTTM, when it's been recorded since the fities?
Appreciate your feedback, please be aware national media are monitoring your response.
SafeSpeedv2 said:
Well TY v much for the kind words and support
I appreciate it. It is a true worthy acknowledgement to Paul's thorough and excellent work, that so many have continued their support.
Driving is a matter of psychology, and it takes much intelligent thought, and research (politically unbiased), to arrive at proper and consistent improvements. Then we can rely on the systems in place, anything less is playing with people's lives.
If the frustration that someone has suffered, in our daily lives, reaches the point where, they have felt that direct action is 'actually' acted upon, then questions have to be asked politically, 'is our policy really right' or, 'was this a one off incident limited by a specific individual'. This should follow up with is the system good but resulting in injustices, to one or more specific society groups?
Was this party that committed this offense from one of those 'group's' or of another.
If this is the case, then why was this 'group' not previously identified, and proper rules applied, from the (intelligent) research, before the system was implemented.
Anything less i.e. commit and roll out a system without thorough research is playing with the psychology of society and specifically, driving & drivers, with potentially disastrous consequences.
See [url=http://www.safespeed.org.uk/effects.html]here[/url], to view what we see as the potential detrimental effects from cameras, on all drivers, ... should we have missed anything, please let me know ...
Claire, a couple of questions: I appreciate it. It is a true worthy acknowledgement to Paul's thorough and excellent work, that so many have continued their support.
Driving is a matter of psychology, and it takes much intelligent thought, and research (politically unbiased), to arrive at proper and consistent improvements. Then we can rely on the systems in place, anything less is playing with people's lives.
If the frustration that someone has suffered, in our daily lives, reaches the point where, they have felt that direct action is 'actually' acted upon, then questions have to be asked politically, 'is our policy really right' or, 'was this a one off incident limited by a specific individual'. This should follow up with is the system good but resulting in injustices, to one or more specific society groups?
Was this party that committed this offense from one of those 'group's' or of another.
If this is the case, then why was this 'group' not previously identified, and proper rules applied, from the (intelligent) research, before the system was implemented.
Anything less i.e. commit and roll out a system without thorough research is playing with the psychology of society and specifically, driving & drivers, with potentially disastrous consequences.
See [url=http://www.safespeed.org.uk/effects.html]here[/url], to view what we see as the potential detrimental effects from cameras, on all drivers, ... should we have missed anything, please let me know ...
Edited by SafeSpeedv2 on Sunday 29th June 16:20
1/
Why did smith encourage people to pervert justice? He suggested people use dead people to duck speeding fines, do you support this please?
2/
Why did he lie about his qualifications and pretend he was a road safety engineer when he was, in fact, a computer engineer?
3/
Why did Jonksch demand that smith remove all references to him from his website?
4/
Why did smith deny posting the peversion of justice advice on his website, the admit posting it?
5/
Why did smith demand all donations to his website be made by cheque, payable to him?
6/
What was the result of smith's PCC complaint against The Times? He claimed he won the case, yet The Times have no record of this and deny any complaint was upheld. The PC concur. No camplaint by smith was recorded, and certainly not won.
7/
Why did smith lie about the LAS report cited above? He claimed speed bumps killed 500 people a year. When he was shown that this was utter b
ks he refused to remove the claim from his website. Why?8/
Why did smith misrepresent Linda Mountain's research and pass it off as his own?
9/
Why did smith claim he alone discovered RTTM, when it's been recorded since the fities?
Appreciate your feedback, please be aware national media are monitoring your response.
CherylPetersen said:
I make that twenty four evasions. Twenty four examples in the last few pages of people refusing to engage with the debate or respond to the points and rather simply post ad hominem or pointlss dribbling bum gravy.
CherylPetersen said:
For tyhe third time, tell me what freaking question I'm supposed to have ignored and I'm happy to answer it.
You can hardly accuse me of answeering questions if you keep refusing to say what the Greek buggery question is.
FOR THE FIFTH TIME, WERE YOU BANNED FROM THE CYCLING PLUS WEBSITE?!!You can hardly accuse me of answeering questions if you keep refusing to say what the Greek buggery question is.
CherylPetersen said:
Apache said:
Why should she reply to you? you don't reply to questions asked of you
Which questions have I ignored please?Eleventh time.
Yes, a torrent of demands seems rather inappropriate, given your tenuous position CP, perhaps you;d like to clear up the outstanding issues with your own story before making such requests of others.
What was it the bible said about removing the plank from your own eye before looking for a speck in others'?
What was it the bible said about removing the plank from your own eye before looking for a speck in others'?
I have advised hundreds of motorists, even famous celebrities and journalists alike about how to successfully get off the NIPS, using the power of the web and the law, fair or fowl to play this 'game' to keep both licences and livlihoods intact!
You are one sick individual and clearly in need of help, for the blatant acts of disrespect you have shown Paul, a man who has passed on and cannot defend himself, God rest his soul and in turn, upsetting Claire no doubt, who has a LOT on her plate both personal and work related at the moment and can well do without your childish rants and blasphemy!
I only stated this topic as a news piece to highlight what happens when people get pushed around, sometimes they FLIP!
This threads gone right off topic and I suugest the mods shut it, lock it, whatever and block you and all your other names, and I think I speak for most people on this site when I say I hope you die of a seriously painful, uncurable slow death, like of cancer or aids, so as not to darken any car enthsiasts web sites again!
We don't care if the National media are watching, as you are not brave enough to step up to the plate to expose yourself, due to the fact that you are on the REGISTER 'sex offenders register' that is!
Please, everyone do not respond to the TROLLS, Pistonhead Towers asure me that they are working on a 'friend or foe' tool to make everyone happy!
The TROLLS are here due to the fact that since Claire has had the Safe Speed forums refreshed and put this kit on, they no longer are 'seen' by anyone, so die away and onto here and other sites I'm afraid!
Hate doing posts like this, just comes down to their level, sorry if I've offended anybody!
CG!
You are one sick individual and clearly in need of help, for the blatant acts of disrespect you have shown Paul, a man who has passed on and cannot defend himself, God rest his soul and in turn, upsetting Claire no doubt, who has a LOT on her plate both personal and work related at the moment and can well do without your childish rants and blasphemy!
I only stated this topic as a news piece to highlight what happens when people get pushed around, sometimes they FLIP!
This threads gone right off topic and I suugest the mods shut it, lock it, whatever and block you and all your other names, and I think I speak for most people on this site when I say I hope you die of a seriously painful, uncurable slow death, like of cancer or aids, so as not to darken any car enthsiasts web sites again!
We don't care if the National media are watching, as you are not brave enough to step up to the plate to expose yourself, due to the fact that you are on the REGISTER 'sex offenders register' that is!
Please, everyone do not respond to the TROLLS, Pistonhead Towers asure me that they are working on a 'friend or foe' tool to make everyone happy!
The TROLLS are here due to the fact that since Claire has had the Safe Speed forums refreshed and put this kit on, they no longer are 'seen' by anyone, so die away and onto here and other sites I'm afraid!
Hate doing posts like this, just comes down to their level, sorry if I've offended anybody!
CG!
Apache said:
CherylPetersen said:
I make that twenty four evasions. Twenty four examples in the last few pages of people refusing to engage with the debate or respond to the points and rather simply post ad hominem or pointlss dribbling bum gravy.
CherylPetersen said:
For tyhe third time, tell me what freaking question I'm supposed to have ignored and I'm happy to answer it.
You can hardly accuse me of answeering questions if you keep refusing to say what the Greek buggery question is.
FOR THE FIFTH TIME, WERE YOU BANNED FROM THE CYCLING PLUS WEBSITE?!!You can hardly accuse me of answeering questions if you keep refusing to say what the Greek buggery question is.
Apache said:
Apache said:
CherylPetersen said:
I make that twenty four evasions. Twenty four examples in the last few pages of people refusing to engage with the debate or respond to the points and rather simply post ad hominem or pointlss dribbling bum gravy.
CherylPetersen said:
For tyhe third time, tell me what freaking question I'm supposed to have ignored and I'm happy to answer it.
You can hardly accuse me of answeering questions if you keep refusing to say what the Greek buggery question is.
FOR THE FIFTH TIME, WERE YOU BANNED FROM THE CYCLING PLUS WEBSITE?!!You can hardly accuse me of answeering questions if you keep refusing to say what the Greek buggery question is.
CherylPetersen said:
Apache said:
Why should she reply to you? you don't reply to questions asked of you
Which questions have I ignored please?Eleventh time.
attack a dead man?Just in case you're in any doubt here.... I think you're an utter
who is below contempt. You're a fking knob cheese smelling st for brains who isn't fit to lick the turds from my ringpiece. Got that dhead?Why don't you just f
k off and die in a festering heap of puss you UTTER tt.HRG said:
CherylPetersen said:
Apache said:
Why should she reply to you? you don't reply to questions asked of you
Which questions have I ignored please?Eleventh time.
attack a dead man?Just in case you're in any doubt here.... I think you're an utter
who is below contempt. You're a fking knob cheese smelling st for brains who isn't fit to lick the turds from my ringpiece. Got that dhead?Why don't you just f
k off and die in a festering heap of puss you UTTER tt.
If you want to really get under his skin, DO NOT REPLY TO HIS POSTS, NO MATTER HOW DISTASTEFUL OR INFLAMMATORY THEIR CONTENT.
This pointless turd has hounded SafeSpeed and cajoled cycling forums for far too long. He is effectively banned from more forums than I have had hot dinners and he feeds off of any acknowledgment of his own sad existence.
Perhaps, in the wake of Paul's end of days, it is time for the tables to be turned and a campaign to rid the Internet of this cancerous growth on the rectum of Humanity initiated. Let him be placed on the defensive so that his ghastly purpose - whatever it may be - is destroyed and ALL road users can push in a common direction toward restoring some form of sense to our national transport systems.
As of now, Spindrift is the enema...
This pointless turd has hounded SafeSpeed and cajoled cycling forums for far too long. He is effectively banned from more forums than I have had hot dinners and he feeds off of any acknowledgment of his own sad existence.
Perhaps, in the wake of Paul's end of days, it is time for the tables to be turned and a campaign to rid the Internet of this cancerous growth on the rectum of Humanity initiated. Let him be placed on the defensive so that his ghastly purpose - whatever it may be - is destroyed and ALL road users can push in a common direction toward restoring some form of sense to our national transport systems.
As of now, Spindrift is the enema...
Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff