Ian Huntley sues for £100,000 compensation.

[Langweilig]

NO, NO, NO, NO, NO! This evil murdering bd must be given no money at all!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1299042/Hu...

[anonymous-user]

I'm amazed he is still alive!

Can't any of the crims just finish him off?

[Glassman]

They're trying. Clearly.

[Pcot]

The knife would have been better going in his throat, not across it.........phuking evil bd!

I don't think this case will materialise.

[Syd knee]

I am not sure who is worse, him or the legal team representing him.

[anonymous-user]

Glassman said:

They're trying. Clearly.

Well they are not trying hard enough!

Stupid crims!

[CatfishCKY]

Grrr the justice system of this country infuriates me. He MURDERED two little girls, and therefore in jail where every one hates him, and so he's trying to seek compensation. I hope the judges (should it ever come to that) see sense, and throw this case out. He's a disgusting pig of a man, he should be thankful he hasn't been killed on the inside, yet!

[Glassman]

Shaid GTB said:

Glassman said:

They're trying. Clearly.

Well they are not trying hard enough!

Stupid crims!

If, as an inmate, you have the chance to cut or kill someone like Huntley and you don't, the repercussions from the other inmates are quite severe.

[oldsoak]

CatfishCKY said:

Grrr the justice system of this country infuriates me. He MURDERED two little girls, and therefore in jail where every one hates him, and so he's trying to seek compensation. I hope the judges (should it ever come to that) see sense, and throw this case out. He's a disgusting pig of a man, he should be thankful he hasn't been killed on the inside, yet!

They ought to do the job properly and kill him on the outside as well as the inside........

[CatfishCKY]

Technically, I think he's been killed on the inside anyway. Anyone who murders, can't have much happening on the inside, can they?

[Flanders.]

Langweilig said:

NO, NO, NO, NO, NO! This evil murdering bd must be given no money at all!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1299042/Hu...

I hope the gets killed.

[Rubin215]

Oh no, keep him alive as long as possible.

Life inside, when you are someone like him, is barely worth living.

Despite everything the papers would have us believe he will not be safe, will not be protected and will not be enjoying himself very much at all.

Long may it continue.

[Zod]

Syd knee said:

I am not sure who is worse, him or the legal team representing him.

Of course prisoners should be denied legal representation.

ETA: people like you are the bane of a lawyer's life: the kind of moron who at a party asks "how can lawyers represent criminals they know to be guilty?"

Why do you think we have courts? Should guilt be decided by the Police? By the Sun?

Why do you think we have higher courts to consider appeals?

It is highly unlikely that you will find yourself wrongfully accused of a serious crime, but just try to imagine that you were and the press vilified you, so that most people considered you to be guilty (and so would you if you were not yourself the accused). Should you be denied legal representation?

Care to think again?

(I am certain that Huntley is guilty and would be delighted if he were to meet with a painful end)

Edited by Zod on Saturday 31st July 00:19

[stigmundfreud]

Zod said:

Syd knee said:

I am not sure who is worse, him or the legal team representing him.

Of course prisoners should be denied legal representation.

ETA: people like you are the bane of a lawyer's life: the kind of moron who at a party asks "how can lawyers represent criminals they know to be guilty?"

Why do you think we have courts? Should guilt be decided by the Police? By the Sun?

Why do you think we have higher courts to consider appeals?

It is highly unlikely that you will find yourself wrongfully accused of a serious crime, but just try to imagine that you were and the press vilified you, so that most people considered you to be guilty (and so would you if you were not yourself the accused). Should you be denied legal representation?

Care to think again?

(I am certain that Huntley is guilty and would be delighted if he were to meet with a painful end)

Edited by Zod on Saturday 31st July 00:19

regardless of the legal rights and wrongs it would take someone with the morals lower than a snakes arse to represent him (now he's been found guilty and all that)

[Rubin215]

stigmundfreud said:

Zod said:

Syd knee said:

I am not sure who is worse, him or the legal team representing him.

Of course prisoners should be denied legal representation.

ETA: people like you are the bane of a lawyer's life: the kind of moron who at a party asks "how can lawyers represent criminals they know to be guilty?"

Why do you think we have courts? Should guilt be decided by the Police? By the Sun?

Why do you think we have higher courts to consider appeals?

It is highly unlikely that you will find yourself wrongfully accused of a serious crime, but just try to imagine that you were and the press vilified you, so that most people considered you to be guilty (and so would you if you were not yourself the accused). Should you be denied legal representation?

Care to think again?

(I am certain that Huntley is guilty and would be delighted if he were to meet with a painful end)

Edited by Zod on Saturday 31st July 00:19

regardless of the legal rights and wrongs it would take someone with the morals lower than a snakes arse to represent him (now he's been found guilty and all that)

Considering a career in the legal proffession, Stiggy...?

[Zod]

Of course stiggy. The same would go for you if you were innocent despite the whole country being convinced ypu were a murderous nonce.

Just try to think, please.

[otolith]

It's revolting that he isn't ashamed to try this.

[stigmundfreud]

Zod said:

Of course stiggy. The same would go for you if you were innocent despite the whole country being convinced ypu were a murderous nonce.

Just try to think, please.

Look there are times when the evidence the whole evidence is indisputable and yet those with a vested interest (Legal lot) trott out such time tested statements to help keep them in their bubbles.

Devils Advocate, if ever a film got it spot on.

OF course those inside need legal representation because they may be innocent, but then sometimes its so obvious of the guilt their requests should be laughed out. However, as this is kching tax payer footing the bill time, I am sure some shylock is more than happy to take on the cause.

Despite all that, I still think you have one of the best living rooms on the home cinema thread - please tell me you didnt pay for it by representing Hindley, Sutcliffe and Neilson?

[Zod]

Stiggy, I represent only major corporates, mega-rich individuals, hedge funds and investment banks (many would think me evil for that).


Come on, matey, you can't seriously be trying to use a bks film like that to support your argument?

We cannot have a legal system that says "All are entitled to legal representation,except for those most people think are guilty".

PS I do appreciate that you like the room in which I am currently sitting listening for the second time tonight to the new Arcade Fire album that arrived in the post today.

PPS I'm not that bloody old! I didn't qualify until 1992!

Edited by Zod on Saturday 31st July 01:13

[Octoposse]

The relity is that prisoners have far MORE access to legal professionals than someone on the outside who earns the national average wage.

I remember a piece in the "Guardian" (yes, I'm a reader!) a couple of years ago by a lifer (I think) who said something like . . "all prisoners have grudges. Giving them unlimited access to legal advice is like giving salmonella a warm room full of chicken to play with".

PS On past experience bet he wins!